Assessment of the shock index in septic shock: A systematic review

Juan José Diaztagle Fernández , Juan Pablo Castañeda-González , José Ignacio Trujillo Zambrano , Francy Esmith Duarte Martínez , Miguel Ángel Saavedra Ortiz
{"title":"Assessment of the shock index in septic shock: A systematic review","authors":"Juan José Diaztagle Fernández ,&nbsp;Juan Pablo Castañeda-González ,&nbsp;José Ignacio Trujillo Zambrano ,&nbsp;Francy Esmith Duarte Martínez ,&nbsp;Miguel Ángel Saavedra Ortiz","doi":"10.1016/j.medine.2024.07.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To identify published research on the Shock Index (SI) in patients with septic shock or severe sepsis and to describe its main findings and conclusions.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Systematic review of the literature following the recommendations of the PRISMA protocol (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses).</div></div><div><h3>Settings</h3><div>The following databases were consulted: Pubmed, Embase, Library Cochrane and Lilacs.</div></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><div>Patients older than 14 years with septic shock. Pregnant women and population with COVID-19 were excluded.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Studies reporting measurement of the shock index or its modified variants.</div></div><div><h3>Main variables of interest</h3><div>Absolute frequencies and relative frequencies were assessed with measures of central tendency and dispersion. Effect estimators (OR, RR and HR) were extracted according to the context of each study.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seventeen articles were included, of which 11 investigated the SI as a predictor of mortality. Seven of them found significant differences in the SI when comparing survivors to non-survivors and observed a relationship between the SI evolution and clinical outcomes. Additional research evidenced a relation between the Modified Shock Index and myocardial depression, as well as mortality. Furthermore, they identified a relationship between the Diastolic Shock Index, the dose of administered dobutamine, and mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The results suggest that both the SI and its modified versions, particularly in serial assessments, can be considered for evaluating patient prognosis. The SI can also aid in determining fluid management for patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94139,"journal":{"name":"Medicina intensiva","volume":"48 11","pages":"Pages e10-e19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173572724001942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To identify published research on the Shock Index (SI) in patients with septic shock or severe sepsis and to describe its main findings and conclusions.

Design

Systematic review of the literature following the recommendations of the PRISMA protocol (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses).

Settings

The following databases were consulted: Pubmed, Embase, Library Cochrane and Lilacs.

Patients

Patients older than 14 years with septic shock. Pregnant women and population with COVID-19 were excluded.

Interventions

Studies reporting measurement of the shock index or its modified variants.

Main variables of interest

Absolute frequencies and relative frequencies were assessed with measures of central tendency and dispersion. Effect estimators (OR, RR and HR) were extracted according to the context of each study.

Results

Seventeen articles were included, of which 11 investigated the SI as a predictor of mortality. Seven of them found significant differences in the SI when comparing survivors to non-survivors and observed a relationship between the SI evolution and clinical outcomes. Additional research evidenced a relation between the Modified Shock Index and myocardial depression, as well as mortality. Furthermore, they identified a relationship between the Diastolic Shock Index, the dose of administered dobutamine, and mortality.

Conclusions

The results suggest that both the SI and its modified versions, particularly in serial assessments, can be considered for evaluating patient prognosis. The SI can also aid in determining fluid management for patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脓毒性休克的休克指数评估:系统综述。
目的确定已发表的有关脓毒性休克或严重脓毒症患者休克指数(SI)的研究,并描述其主要发现和结论:设计:按照 PRISMA 协议(系统综述和 Meta 分析首选报告项目)的建议对文献进行系统综述:查阅了以下数据库Pubmed、Embase、Library Cochrane 和 Lilacs:14岁以上脓毒性休克患者。不包括孕妇和患有 COVID-19 的人群:干预措施:报告休克指数或其修正变体测量结果的研究:绝对频率和相对频率通过中心倾向和离散度量进行评估。根据每项研究的背景提取效应估计值(OR、RR 和 HR):结果:共收录了 17 篇文章,其中 11 篇研究了作为死亡率预测因素的 SI。其中 7 篇文章发现,幸存者与非幸存者的 SI 存在明显差异,并观察到 SI 变化与临床结果之间的关系。其他研究证明了修正冲击指数与心肌抑制和死亡率之间的关系。此外,他们还确定了舒张性休克指数、多巴酚丁胺给药剂量与死亡率之间的关系:结果表明,SI 及其修正版,尤其是在连续评估中,可用于评估患者的预后。SI 还有助于确定患者的输液管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correlation and concordance of HACOR and IROX scales in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia who received non-invasive ventilation in two intensive care units. From geometric equations to dynamic strategies: advances in the personalization of mechanical ventilation through mechanical power. High flow in tracheostomized patients on their first attempt to wean from mechanical ventilation: More questions on the table. Shocked and moved. Early mobilisation in cardiogenic shock. Early mobilisation in patients with shock and receiving vasoactive drugs in the intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1