Herders' risk preference and grassland transfer strategy: Evidence from a field experiment in pastoral areas of China

IF 3.6 2区 农林科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Land Degradation & Development Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1002/ldr.5236
Shiqi Guan, Zeng Tang, Menglin Zhao, Yiwen Li
{"title":"Herders' risk preference and grassland transfer strategy: Evidence from a field experiment in pastoral areas of China","authors":"Shiqi Guan,&nbsp;Zeng Tang,&nbsp;Menglin Zhao,&nbsp;Yiwen Li","doi":"10.1002/ldr.5236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Encouraging and guiding herders to participate in grassland transfer promotes the high-quality development of grassland animal husbandry. We conducted a survey among 356 herders from Qinghai and Gansu provinces in China, to explore the impact of herders' risk preference and perceptions on their grassland transfer strategies. We used experimental economics methods to measure the risk preferences of herders. Our results indicate that the majority of herders exhibit risk-averse attitudes. A theoretical model was used to establish hypotheses on the relationship between risk preference and grassland transfer decision-making. The double-hurdle model and moderating effect model were used to test these hypotheses. Our analysis shows that herders' risk preferences have a significant negative effect on their decisions to engage in grassland transfer. Both risk preferences and risk perception have a significant impact on grassland transfer-in decisions, but no significant impact on grassland transfer-out. A heterogeneity analysis revealed that the impact of risk preferences on grassland transfer participation is more pronounced among herders in Qinghai compared to those in Gansu. Moreover, we found that risk perception plays a moderating role on the influence of risk preferences on decisions regarding grassland transfer. These findings are crucial to formulate strategies for the sustainable management of the grassland transfer market.</p>","PeriodicalId":203,"journal":{"name":"Land Degradation & Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Degradation & Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ldr.5236","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Encouraging and guiding herders to participate in grassland transfer promotes the high-quality development of grassland animal husbandry. We conducted a survey among 356 herders from Qinghai and Gansu provinces in China, to explore the impact of herders' risk preference and perceptions on their grassland transfer strategies. We used experimental economics methods to measure the risk preferences of herders. Our results indicate that the majority of herders exhibit risk-averse attitudes. A theoretical model was used to establish hypotheses on the relationship between risk preference and grassland transfer decision-making. The double-hurdle model and moderating effect model were used to test these hypotheses. Our analysis shows that herders' risk preferences have a significant negative effect on their decisions to engage in grassland transfer. Both risk preferences and risk perception have a significant impact on grassland transfer-in decisions, but no significant impact on grassland transfer-out. A heterogeneity analysis revealed that the impact of risk preferences on grassland transfer participation is more pronounced among herders in Qinghai compared to those in Gansu. Moreover, we found that risk perception plays a moderating role on the influence of risk preferences on decisions regarding grassland transfer. These findings are crucial to formulate strategies for the sustainable management of the grassland transfer market.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牧民的风险偏好与草场转移策略:来自中国牧区田间试验的证据
鼓励和引导牧民参与草原流转,促进草原畜牧业高质量发展。我们对中国青海省和甘肃省的 356 户牧民进行了调查,以探讨牧民的风险偏好和认知对其草原流转策略的影响。我们采用实验经济学方法测量了牧民的风险偏好。结果表明,大多数牧民表现出规避风险的态度。我们利用理论模型建立了风险偏好与草原转移决策之间关系的假设。我们使用了双赫尔德模型和调节效应模型来检验这些假设。我们的分析表明,牧民的风险偏好对其草原流转决策有显著的负面影响。风险偏好和风险认知对草原转入决策有显著影响,但对草原转出决策没有显著影响。异质性分析表明,与甘肃牧民相比,青海牧民的风险偏好对参与草原流转的影响更为明显。此外,我们还发现,风险认知对风险偏好对草原流转决策的影响起着调节作用。这些发现对于制定草原流转市场的可持续管理策略至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Land Degradation & Development
Land Degradation & Development 农林科学-环境科学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
5.5 months
期刊介绍: Land Degradation & Development is an international journal which seeks to promote rational study of the recognition, monitoring, control and rehabilitation of degradation in terrestrial environments. The journal focuses on: - what land degradation is; - what causes land degradation; - the impacts of land degradation - the scale of land degradation; - the history, current status or future trends of land degradation; - avoidance, mitigation and control of land degradation; - remedial actions to rehabilitate or restore degraded land; - sustainable land management.
期刊最新文献
Carbon Sequestration and Soil Fertility Management in Sandy and Clayey Soils Revealed by Over Four Decades of Long‐Term Field Experiments in Thailand How Do Changes in Ecosystem Services Multifunctionality Influence Human Wellbeing? Evidence From the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration in China The Water, Food, and Energy Nexus: The Inclusive Roles of Governance and Finance in South Asia The Disturbance of Biocrusts Subsoil Stoichiometry by Grazing Could Not Compensate for Its Damage Effect Soil Phosphorus Transport in Response to Climate Change at Mid-High Latitudes Under Intensive Agriculture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1