Functional priorities of individuals with spinal cord injury: a Saudi Arabian perspective

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Spinal cord Pub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI:10.1038/s41393-024-01018-0
Sami Ullah, Ahmad Zaheer Qureshi, Talal Ali AlWehaibi, Farooq Azam Rathore, Waqas Sami, Saeed Bin Ayaz, Nurah Hamad AlKeid, Maryam Saif Alibrahim, Ahmed Mushabbab AlHabter, Wafa Bani Alketheeri, Mohammad Salman Bashir
{"title":"Functional priorities of individuals with spinal cord injury: a Saudi Arabian perspective","authors":"Sami Ullah, Ahmad Zaheer Qureshi, Talal Ali AlWehaibi, Farooq Azam Rathore, Waqas Sami, Saeed Bin Ayaz, Nurah Hamad AlKeid, Maryam Saif Alibrahim, Ahmed Mushabbab AlHabter, Wafa Bani Alketheeri, Mohammad Salman Bashir","doi":"10.1038/s41393-024-01018-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"People with spinal cord injury (SCI) are the deciding force behind the rehabilitation program to improve their quality of life (QoL) based on their personal preferences. Here we aimed to determine the preferences perceived most vital by Saudi SCI population to improve their QoL, and explore if these preferences are affected by gender, education, and duration, level, or extent of injury. Participants ranked seven priorities of bodily functions as Rank I-VII with “I” being “Most important,” and “VII” being “Least important.” Inpatient rehabilitation facility. 120 participants (>18 years of age) of either sex with SCI without polytrauma, acquired brain injury, neurodegenerative disease, and dementia. Ranking scale of seven priorities of bodily functions as Rank I-VII with “I” being “Most important,” and “VII” being “Least important.” Of 101 individuals (mean age: 35.2 ± 14.8 years) finally included, 70.3% were males, 66.3% had onset of SCI since ≥ 3 years, 48.5% had a complete injury, and 75% had paraplegia. Most (26.7%) participants ranked walking as the first priority followed by hand/arm function (20.8%). Sexual function was the least important priority (39.6%). Hand/arm function was significantly more important for individuals with tetraplegia (p < 0.001). Trunk strength and balance was significantly less important for individuals with complete injury (p = 0.037). Participants with the onset of injury < 3 years and a complete injury reported bladder/bowel function as significantly more important (p = 0.011). Walking was significantly more important for people with incomplete injury and for people with injury duration ≥ 3 years (p = 0.022, p = 0.002 respectively). The top priority in our sample of Saudi people with SCI was walking followed by hand/arm function while the least desired function was regaining sexual function. Walking was a prioritized function for people with injury duration ≥ 3 years and people with a complete injury while hand/arm function was highly prioritized by people with tetraplegia.","PeriodicalId":21976,"journal":{"name":"Spinal cord","volume":"62 9","pages":"539-545"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spinal cord","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41393-024-01018-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People with spinal cord injury (SCI) are the deciding force behind the rehabilitation program to improve their quality of life (QoL) based on their personal preferences. Here we aimed to determine the preferences perceived most vital by Saudi SCI population to improve their QoL, and explore if these preferences are affected by gender, education, and duration, level, or extent of injury. Participants ranked seven priorities of bodily functions as Rank I-VII with “I” being “Most important,” and “VII” being “Least important.” Inpatient rehabilitation facility. 120 participants (>18 years of age) of either sex with SCI without polytrauma, acquired brain injury, neurodegenerative disease, and dementia. Ranking scale of seven priorities of bodily functions as Rank I-VII with “I” being “Most important,” and “VII” being “Least important.” Of 101 individuals (mean age: 35.2 ± 14.8 years) finally included, 70.3% were males, 66.3% had onset of SCI since ≥ 3 years, 48.5% had a complete injury, and 75% had paraplegia. Most (26.7%) participants ranked walking as the first priority followed by hand/arm function (20.8%). Sexual function was the least important priority (39.6%). Hand/arm function was significantly more important for individuals with tetraplegia (p < 0.001). Trunk strength and balance was significantly less important for individuals with complete injury (p = 0.037). Participants with the onset of injury < 3 years and a complete injury reported bladder/bowel function as significantly more important (p = 0.011). Walking was significantly more important for people with incomplete injury and for people with injury duration ≥ 3 years (p = 0.022, p = 0.002 respectively). The top priority in our sample of Saudi people with SCI was walking followed by hand/arm function while the least desired function was regaining sexual function. Walking was a prioritized function for people with injury duration ≥ 3 years and people with a complete injury while hand/arm function was highly prioritized by people with tetraplegia.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脊髓损伤者的功能优先事项:沙特阿拉伯的观点。
背景/目标:脊髓损伤(SCI)患者是康复计划的决定力量,他们可以根据自己的个人偏好改善生活质量(QoL)。在此,我们旨在确定沙特 SCI 患者认为对改善其 QoL 最为重要的偏好,并探讨这些偏好是否会受到性别、教育程度、受伤时间、程度或范围的影响:设计:参与者将身体功能的七项优先事项分为 I 至 VII 级,其中 "I "为 "最重要","VII "为 "最不重要":住院康复机构:120 名患有 SCI 且无多发性创伤、后天性脑损伤、神经退行性疾病和痴呆症的男女患者(年龄大于 18 岁):结果:101 名患者(平均年龄:35 岁)中,有 7 名患者的身体机能优先级为 I 至 VII 级,其中 "I "级为 "最重要","VII "级为 "最不重要":在最终纳入的 101 名参与者(平均年龄:35.2 ± 14.8 岁)中,70.3% 为男性,66.3% 自≥ 3 岁起就患有 SCI,48.5% 完全损伤,75% 截瘫。大多数参与者(26.7%)将行走列为首要任务,其次是手/臂功能(20.8%)。性功能是最不重要的优先事项(39.6%)。手/臂功能对四肢瘫痪者的重要性明显更高(p 结论:四肢瘫痪者的首要任务是行走:在我们的沙特 SCI 患者样本中,最优先考虑的功能是行走,其次是手/臂功能,而最不需要的功能是恢复性功能。受伤时间≥ 3 年和完全性损伤的患者优先考虑的功能是行走,而四肢瘫痪患者则高度优先考虑手/臂功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Spinal cord
Spinal cord 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
142
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Spinal Cord is a specialised, international journal that has been publishing spinal cord related manuscripts since 1963. It appears monthly, online and in print, and accepts contributions on spinal cord anatomy, physiology, management of injury and disease, and the quality of life and life circumstances of people with a spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord is multi-disciplinary and publishes contributions across the entire spectrum of research ranging from basic science to applied clinical research. It focuses on high quality original research, systematic reviews and narrative reviews. Spinal Cord''s sister journal Spinal Cord Series and Cases: Clinical Management in Spinal Cord Disorders publishes high quality case reports, small case series, pilot and retrospective studies perspectives, Pulse survey articles, Point-couterpoint articles, correspondences and book reviews. It specialises in material that addresses all aspects of life for persons with spinal cord injuries or disorders. For more information, please see the aims and scope of Spinal Cord Series and Cases.
期刊最新文献
The influencing factors for tracheostomy decannulation after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: a retrospective study. "What should a rehabilitation hospital be like?" Priorities and expectations of people with spinal cord injury in Türkiye. The effect of abdominal functional electrical stimulation on blood pressure in people with high level spinal cord injury. Mortality and causes of death of traumatic spinal cord injury in Finland. Correspondence to "Walking improvement in chronic incomplete spinal cord injury with exoskeleton robotic training (WISE): a randomized controlled trial".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1