Clinical practices for defining, detecting, and diagnosing postoperative atrial fibrillation after coronary revascularization surgery – A scoping review
{"title":"Clinical practices for defining, detecting, and diagnosing postoperative atrial fibrillation after coronary revascularization surgery – A scoping review","authors":"Megan Higgs RN, MN , Julee McDonagh RN, PhD , Jenny Sim RN, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.aucc.2024.06.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This scoping review was undertaken to understand the degree of variation in clinical practices associated with postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF), following coronary revascularization surgery by collating and synthesising key concepts from current published literature.</div></div><div><h3>Review methods and data sources</h3><div>This scoping review was conducted following the framework outlined by Askey and O'Malley. Reporting of this scoping review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist.</div><div>Initial searches were completed in September 2020 and updated in January 2023. Comprehensive searches to identify relevant published literature were carried out within CINAHL, MEDLINE, and ProQuest databases. All searches were limited to full-text papers published in English with human adult participants. Deductive content analysis using NVivo software was performed to synthesise the data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 692 studies were identified during the database searches. After the deletion of duplicates and the application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 73 studies were included in the scoping review. The included studies were published between 2001 and 2022 and included a total of 24,833 participants. Forty-six studies included a definition of POAF, with four of these citing a peak-body definition. A total of 24 included studies reported on electrocardiogram diagnostic criteria for POAF, with 13/24 [54%] describing these characteristics within their definition. The time-based diagnostic criteria ranged from a minimum duration of greater than 30 seconds to greater than 1 hour. The most frequently reported minimum-time thresholds were ≥30 seconds, reported in 12 of 51 (24%) studies and ≥5 min, reported in 13 of 51 (25%) studies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There is a lack of consistency in clinical practice for defining, detecting, and diagnosing POAF, following coronary revascularization surgery. Consensus and standardisation of clinical practices are urgently needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51239,"journal":{"name":"Australian Critical Care","volume":"38 1","pages":"Article 101083"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S103673142400119X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
This scoping review was undertaken to understand the degree of variation in clinical practices associated with postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF), following coronary revascularization surgery by collating and synthesising key concepts from current published literature.
Review methods and data sources
This scoping review was conducted following the framework outlined by Askey and O'Malley. Reporting of this scoping review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist.
Initial searches were completed in September 2020 and updated in January 2023. Comprehensive searches to identify relevant published literature were carried out within CINAHL, MEDLINE, and ProQuest databases. All searches were limited to full-text papers published in English with human adult participants. Deductive content analysis using NVivo software was performed to synthesise the data.
Results
A total of 692 studies were identified during the database searches. After the deletion of duplicates and the application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 73 studies were included in the scoping review. The included studies were published between 2001 and 2022 and included a total of 24,833 participants. Forty-six studies included a definition of POAF, with four of these citing a peak-body definition. A total of 24 included studies reported on electrocardiogram diagnostic criteria for POAF, with 13/24 [54%] describing these characteristics within their definition. The time-based diagnostic criteria ranged from a minimum duration of greater than 30 seconds to greater than 1 hour. The most frequently reported minimum-time thresholds were ≥30 seconds, reported in 12 of 51 (24%) studies and ≥5 min, reported in 13 of 51 (25%) studies.
Conclusions
There is a lack of consistency in clinical practice for defining, detecting, and diagnosing POAF, following coronary revascularization surgery. Consensus and standardisation of clinical practices are urgently needed.
期刊介绍：
Australian Critical Care is the official journal of the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses (ACCCN). It is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal, providing clinically relevant research, reviews and articles of interest to the critical care community. Australian Critical Care publishes peer-reviewed scholarly papers that report research findings, research-based reviews, discussion papers and commentaries which are of interest to an international readership of critical care practitioners, educators, administrators and researchers. Interprofessional articles are welcomed.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
