Synergistic impact of various straw-return methods and irrigation regimes on winter wheat physiological growth and yield

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Field Crops Research Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.fcr.2024.109516
{"title":"Synergistic impact of various straw-return methods and irrigation regimes on winter wheat physiological growth and yield","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.fcr.2024.109516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context or problem</h3><p>Straw return to the field conserves soil moisture, but its effect on winter wheat growth varies, considering the return method used. Optimal irrigation can improve the effects of returning straw to the field. However, studies on the effects of the straw- return method and irrigation interactions on the physiological growth and yield of winter wheat are limited.</p></div><div><h3>Objective or research question</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of two common methods of corn straw-return—burying and mulching— combined with different irrigation regimes on the physiological growth of winter wheat in the North China Plain (NCP). The goal was to establish an economically stable straw-return irrigation regime.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Straw-burying (SB) and straw mulching (SM) treatments were applied under three irrigation regimes: no irrigation (I<sub>0</sub>), 60 mm irrigation during the jointing stage (I<sub>60</sub>), and 60 mm irrigation during both the jointing and heading stages (I<sub>60+60</sub>) during the winter wheat growing seasons from 2020 to 2022. Leaf area index (LAI), stem number, photosynthetic characteristics, photosynthesis-active radiation (PAR) capture rate, dry matter accumulation, and winter wheat yield were measured and calculated. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to analyze the correlation between physiological indexes and winter wheat yield.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>SB-I<sub>60</sub> and SB-I<sub>60+60</sub> maintained higher stem numbers and LAI in winter wheat, compared with SM-I<sub>60</sub> and SM-I<sub>60+60</sub>. SB-I<sub>60+60</sub> had the highest photosynthetic and PAR capture rates. Under the same irrigation treatment, the spike numbers and yield of SB increased by 2.47–5.73 % and 4.37–9.51 % compared with those of SM, respectively. Under the same straw-return treatment, irrigation improved the straw-return effect, and the yield and dry matter accumulation of winter wheat increased with increasing irrigation. SB-I<sub>60+60</sub> recorded the highest wheat yield. SEM analysis revealed that yield was positively affected by LAI and photosynthetic rate.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The application of SB-I<sub>60+60</sub> increased grain yield, enhancing food security and optimizing the benefits from straw return.</p></div><div><h3>Implications or significance</h3><p>This study revealed the optimal straw application and irrigation for wheat production, promoting food security in dry regions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12143,"journal":{"name":"Field Crops Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Field Crops Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429024002697","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context or problem

Straw return to the field conserves soil moisture, but its effect on winter wheat growth varies, considering the return method used. Optimal irrigation can improve the effects of returning straw to the field. However, studies on the effects of the straw- return method and irrigation interactions on the physiological growth and yield of winter wheat are limited.

Objective or research question

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of two common methods of corn straw-return—burying and mulching— combined with different irrigation regimes on the physiological growth of winter wheat in the North China Plain (NCP). The goal was to establish an economically stable straw-return irrigation regime.

Methods

Straw-burying (SB) and straw mulching (SM) treatments were applied under three irrigation regimes: no irrigation (I0), 60 mm irrigation during the jointing stage (I60), and 60 mm irrigation during both the jointing and heading stages (I60+60) during the winter wheat growing seasons from 2020 to 2022. Leaf area index (LAI), stem number, photosynthetic characteristics, photosynthesis-active radiation (PAR) capture rate, dry matter accumulation, and winter wheat yield were measured and calculated. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to analyze the correlation between physiological indexes and winter wheat yield.

Results

SB-I60 and SB-I60+60 maintained higher stem numbers and LAI in winter wheat, compared with SM-I60 and SM-I60+60. SB-I60+60 had the highest photosynthetic and PAR capture rates. Under the same irrigation treatment, the spike numbers and yield of SB increased by 2.47–5.73 % and 4.37–9.51 % compared with those of SM, respectively. Under the same straw-return treatment, irrigation improved the straw-return effect, and the yield and dry matter accumulation of winter wheat increased with increasing irrigation. SB-I60+60 recorded the highest wheat yield. SEM analysis revealed that yield was positively affected by LAI and photosynthetic rate.

Conclusions

The application of SB-I60+60 increased grain yield, enhancing food security and optimizing the benefits from straw return.

Implications or significance

This study revealed the optimal straw application and irrigation for wheat production, promoting food security in dry regions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
各种秸秆还田方法和灌溉制度对冬小麦生理生长和产量的协同影响
秸秆还田可以保持土壤水分,但其对冬小麦生长的影响因还田方式而异。优化灌溉可以提高秸秆还田的效果。然而,有关秸秆还田方法和灌溉相互作用对冬小麦生理生长和产量影响的研究还很有限。本研究旨在调查两种常见的玉米秸秆还田方法--掩埋和覆盖--与不同灌溉制度相结合对华北平原(NCP)冬小麦生理生长的影响。目的是建立经济稳定的秸秆还田灌溉制度。在 2020 年至 2022 年的冬小麦生长季节,在三种灌溉制度下应用了秸秆掩埋(SB)和秸秆覆盖(SM)处理:不灌溉(I)、在拔节期灌溉 60 毫米(I)以及在拔节期和打顶期灌溉 60 毫米(I)。测量并计算了叶面积指数(LAI)、茎数、光合特性、光合有效辐射(PAR)捕获率、干物质积累和冬小麦产量。采用结构方程模型(SEM)分析了生理指标与冬小麦产量之间的相关性。与 SM-I 和 SM-I 相比,SB-I 和 SB-I 保持了较高的冬小麦茎数和 LAI。SB-I 的光合作用率和 PAR 捕获率最高。在相同灌溉处理下,SB 的穗粒数和产量分别比 SM 增加了 2.47-5.73 % 和 4.37-9.51 %。在相同的秸秆还田处理下,灌溉改善了秸秆还田效果,冬小麦的产量和干物质积累随灌溉增加而增加。SB-I 的小麦产量最高。SEM 分析显示,产量受 LAI 和光合速率的正向影响。施用 SB-I 增加了粮食产量,提高了粮食安全,优化了秸秆还田的效益。这项研究揭示了小麦生产的最佳秸秆应用和灌溉方式,促进了干旱地区的粮食安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Field Crops Research
Field Crops Research 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
12.10%
发文量
307
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Field Crops Research is an international journal publishing scientific articles on: √ experimental and modelling research at field, farm and landscape levels on temperate and tropical crops and cropping systems, with a focus on crop ecology and physiology, agronomy, and plant genetics and breeding.
期刊最新文献
The split injection of water-soluble fertilizers effectively reduces N2O, CH4 and NH3 emissions while simultaneously improving rice yield and harvest index Estimating wheat partitioning coefficient using remote sensing and its coupling with a crop growth model Effect of sulfur and potassium foliar applications on wheat grain protein quality Legume and maize intercropping enhances subsequent oilseed rape productivity and stability under reduced nitrogen input Biochar addition mitigates asymmetric competition of water and increases yield advantages of maize–alfalfa strip intercropping systems in a semiarid region on the Loess Plateau
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1