Risk of colorectal cancer and adenoma after an appendectomy: results from three large prospective cohort studies and meta-analysis

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Cancer Causes & Control Pub Date : 2024-07-27 DOI:10.1007/s10552-024-01901-4
Yiwen Zhang, Jaewon Khil, Xiaoshuang Feng, Tomotaka Ugai, Shuji Ogino, Edward Giovannucci
{"title":"Risk of colorectal cancer and adenoma after an appendectomy: results from three large prospective cohort studies and meta-analysis","authors":"Yiwen Zhang, Jaewon Khil, Xiaoshuang Feng, Tomotaka Ugai, Shuji Ogino, Edward Giovannucci","doi":"10.1007/s10552-024-01901-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>The relationship between appendectomy and subsequent colorectal cancer risk remains unclear, and no study has examined its association with colorectal adenoma.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We used data from three prospective cohorts: Health Professionals Follow-up Study, Nurses’ Health Study (NHS), and NHSII. Appendectomy history was self-reported at baseline. Colorectal cancer risk was analyzed with Cox proportional hazard models among 224,109 participants followed up to 32 years. Colorectal adenoma risk was evaluated among 157,490 participants with at least one lower gastrointestinal endoscopy during follow-up with logistic regression models accounting for repeated observations. We also performed a meta-analysis of cohort studies that examined association between appendectomy and colorectal cancer risk.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>We documented 3,384 colorectal cancers, 13,006 conventional adenomas, and 11,519 serrated polyps during the follow-up period. Compared to participants without appendectomy, those who reported appendectomy history were not at higher risk of colorectal (HR [95% CI], 0.92 [0.84–1.00]), colon (0.92 [0.83–1.01]), or rectal (0.85 [0.70–1.03]) cancer. Similarly, appendectomy history was not associated with higher risk of conventional adenoma (OR [95% CI], 1.00 [0.97–1.02]), serrated polyp (0.97 [0.94–1.00]), or high-risk adenoma (0.96 [0.92–1.01]). The meta-analysis showed appendectomy was associated with a higher risk of colorectal cancer within a short time after the procedure (1.68 [1.01–2.81]), while the long-term risk was slightly inverse (0.94 [0.90–0.97]).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>We found no evidence of an association between appendectomy history and long-term risk of colorectal cancer or its precursors. The observed higher risk of colorectal cancer right after appendectomy in the first few years is likely due to reverse causation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9432,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Causes & Control","volume":"203 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Causes & Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-024-01901-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The relationship between appendectomy and subsequent colorectal cancer risk remains unclear, and no study has examined its association with colorectal adenoma.

Methods

We used data from three prospective cohorts: Health Professionals Follow-up Study, Nurses’ Health Study (NHS), and NHSII. Appendectomy history was self-reported at baseline. Colorectal cancer risk was analyzed with Cox proportional hazard models among 224,109 participants followed up to 32 years. Colorectal adenoma risk was evaluated among 157,490 participants with at least one lower gastrointestinal endoscopy during follow-up with logistic regression models accounting for repeated observations. We also performed a meta-analysis of cohort studies that examined association between appendectomy and colorectal cancer risk.

Results

We documented 3,384 colorectal cancers, 13,006 conventional adenomas, and 11,519 serrated polyps during the follow-up period. Compared to participants without appendectomy, those who reported appendectomy history were not at higher risk of colorectal (HR [95% CI], 0.92 [0.84–1.00]), colon (0.92 [0.83–1.01]), or rectal (0.85 [0.70–1.03]) cancer. Similarly, appendectomy history was not associated with higher risk of conventional adenoma (OR [95% CI], 1.00 [0.97–1.02]), serrated polyp (0.97 [0.94–1.00]), or high-risk adenoma (0.96 [0.92–1.01]). The meta-analysis showed appendectomy was associated with a higher risk of colorectal cancer within a short time after the procedure (1.68 [1.01–2.81]), while the long-term risk was slightly inverse (0.94 [0.90–0.97]).

Conclusion

We found no evidence of an association between appendectomy history and long-term risk of colorectal cancer or its precursors. The observed higher risk of colorectal cancer right after appendectomy in the first few years is likely due to reverse causation.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阑尾切除术后患大肠癌和腺瘤的风险:三项大型前瞻性队列研究和荟萃分析的结果
目的 阑尾切除术与随后的结直肠癌风险之间的关系仍不清楚,也没有研究探讨其与结直肠腺瘤的关系:我们使用了三个前瞻性队列的数据:健康专业人员随访研究(Health Professionals Follow-up Study)、护士健康研究(Nurses' Health Study,NHS)和 NHSII。阑尾切除史是在基线时自我报告的。对 224,109 名随访长达 32 年的参与者采用 Cox 比例危险模型对结直肠癌风险进行了分析。在随访期间至少接受过一次下消化道内镜检查的 157490 名参与者中,使用逻辑回归模型对结直肠腺瘤风险进行了评估,并考虑了重复观察的因素。我们还对研究阑尾切除术与结直肠癌风险关系的队列研究进行了荟萃分析。结果 我们在随访期间记录了3384例结直肠癌、13006例常规腺瘤和11519例锯齿状息肉。与未进行阑尾切除术的参与者相比,报告有阑尾切除术史的参与者罹患结直肠癌(HR [95% CI],0.92 [0.84-1.00])、结肠癌(0.92 [0.83-1.01])或直肠癌(0.85 [0.70-1.03])的风险并不高。同样,阑尾切除术史与常规腺瘤(OR [95%CI],1.00 [0.97-1.02])、锯齿状息肉(0.97 [0.94-1.00])或高危腺瘤(0.96 [0.92-1.01])的较高风险无关。荟萃分析表明,阑尾切除术与术后短时间内较高的结直肠癌风险相关(1.68 [1.01-2.81]),而长期风险略呈反比(0.94 [0.90-0.97])。在阑尾切除术后的最初几年中观察到的较高的结直肠癌风险很可能是由于反向因果关系造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Causes & Control
Cancer Causes & Control 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6.6 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Causes & Control is an international refereed journal that both reports and stimulates new avenues of investigation into the causes, control, and subsequent prevention of cancer. By drawing together related information published currently in a diverse range of biological and medical journals, it has a multidisciplinary and multinational approach. The scope of the journal includes: variation in cancer distribution within and between populations; factors associated with cancer risk; preventive and therapeutic interventions on a population scale; economic, demographic, and health-policy implications of cancer; and related methodological issues. The emphasis is on speed of publication. The journal will normally publish within 30 to 60 days of acceptance of manuscripts. Cancer Causes & Control publishes Original Articles, Reviews, Commentaries, Opinions, Short Communications and Letters to the Editor which will have direct relevance to researchers and practitioners working in epidemiology, medical statistics, cancer biology, health education, medical economics and related fields. The journal also contains significant information for government agencies concerned with cancer research, control and policy.
期刊最新文献
Adult head circumference and the risk of cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Demographic and temporal variations in gallbladder adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine carcinoma: insights from a retrospective analysis of the national cancer database. Determinants of first-line clinical trial enrollment among Black and White gynecologic cancer patients. Adjuvant endocrine therapy and risk of contralateral breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Methylation-based immune deconvolution in prostate cancer patients before and after radical prostatectomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1