Could Chinese cardiovascular chronic conditions patients gain benefits from pharmaceutical services? A multilevel meta-analysis

Zhijie Deng, Fanglu Chen, Shunshun Peng, Yangjin Huang, Jing Chen, Yufeng Ding, Anhua Wei
{"title":"Could Chinese cardiovascular chronic conditions patients gain benefits from pharmaceutical services? A multilevel meta-analysis","authors":"Zhijie Deng, Fanglu Chen, Shunshun Peng, Yangjin Huang, Jing Chen, Yufeng Ding, Anhua Wei","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.25.24310734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nThe value of pharmaceutical services for Chinese patients with cardiovascular chronic conditions was not recognized.\nAim\nTo investigate the comprehensive value of pharmaceutical services in China and find factors influencing patient benefits.\nDesign and setting\nThis was a systematic review with multilevel meta-analysis of 183 randomized control trials focusing on the benefits of pharmaceutical services for patients with cardiovascular chronic conditions in China.\nMethods\nEnglish databases (PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library) and Chinese databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang database) were searched from database inception to March 27, 2023 for studies focusing on the comparation of benefits between pharmaceutical services and usual care.\nResults\nOur analysis of 187 studies involving 23,895 patients demonstrated significant benefits of pharmaceutical services, particularly in reducing readmission (OR: 0.32; 95%CI: 0.2 to 0.52; I2=50.12%), mitigating ADR (OR: 0.28; 95%CI: 0.24 to 0.33; I2=18.07%), and improving patient adherence. However, no benefit was observed in terms of mortality rate and the cost of hospitalization and medication and the risk of bias was generally existed among the included studies.\nConclusions\nThis study highlights the significant benefits of pharmaceutical services for clinical outcomes and adherence among Chinese patients with cardiovascular chronic conditions. However, the benefits in terms of economic outcomes remain unclear. The influence of population-specific factors, such as disease and age, underscores the need for context-specific and disease-tailored studies to provide precise evidence regarding the advantages of pharmaceutical services. And our findings provide some new ideas for the subsequent research and design, standard formulation and policy implementation.","PeriodicalId":501023,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Primary Care Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Primary Care Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.25.24310734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The value of pharmaceutical services for Chinese patients with cardiovascular chronic conditions was not recognized. Aim To investigate the comprehensive value of pharmaceutical services in China and find factors influencing patient benefits. Design and setting This was a systematic review with multilevel meta-analysis of 183 randomized control trials focusing on the benefits of pharmaceutical services for patients with cardiovascular chronic conditions in China. Methods English databases (PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library) and Chinese databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang database) were searched from database inception to March 27, 2023 for studies focusing on the comparation of benefits between pharmaceutical services and usual care. Results Our analysis of 187 studies involving 23,895 patients demonstrated significant benefits of pharmaceutical services, particularly in reducing readmission (OR: 0.32; 95%CI: 0.2 to 0.52; I2=50.12%), mitigating ADR (OR: 0.28; 95%CI: 0.24 to 0.33; I2=18.07%), and improving patient adherence. However, no benefit was observed in terms of mortality rate and the cost of hospitalization and medication and the risk of bias was generally existed among the included studies. Conclusions This study highlights the significant benefits of pharmaceutical services for clinical outcomes and adherence among Chinese patients with cardiovascular chronic conditions. However, the benefits in terms of economic outcomes remain unclear. The influence of population-specific factors, such as disease and age, underscores the need for context-specific and disease-tailored studies to provide precise evidence regarding the advantages of pharmaceutical services. And our findings provide some new ideas for the subsequent research and design, standard formulation and policy implementation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国心血管慢性病患者能否从医药服务中获益?多层次荟萃分析
背景医药服务对中国心血管慢性病患者的价值尚未得到认可。目的研究医药服务在中国的综合价值,并找出影响患者获益的因素。设计与环境这是一项系统性综述,对183项随机对照试验进行了多层次荟萃分析,这些试验关注医药服务对中国心血管慢性病患者的益处。方法检索英文数据库(PubMed、EMBASE、the Cochrane Library)和中文数据库(中国国家知识基础设施、万方数据库),检索时间从数据库建立之初至 2023 年 3 月 27 日,检索重点为医药服务与常规护理之间获益比较的研究。结果我们对涉及 23,895 名患者的 187 项研究进行了分析,结果表明药学服务具有显著的益处,尤其是在减少再入院率(OR:0.32;95%CI:0.2 至 0.52;I2=50.12%)、减轻 ADR(OR:0.28;95%CI:0.24 至 0.33;I2=18.07%)和提高患者依从性方面。结论本研究强调了医药服务对中国心血管慢性病患者临床疗效和依从性的显著益处。然而,经济效益方面的益处仍不明确。疾病和年龄等人口特异性因素的影响突出表明,需要针对具体情况和疾病进行研究,以提供有关医药服务优势的确切证据。我们的研究结果也为后续的研究设计、标准制定和政策实施提供了一些新思路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perceived barriers to research and scholarship among physicians Providing an e-cigarette starter kit for smoking cessation and reduction as adjunct to usual care to smokers with a mental health condition: Findings from the ESCAPE feasibility study Primary Care Physicians' Practices and Barriers in Evaluating and Managing Chronic Kidney Disease in New Providence, The Bahamas Development and evaluation of codelists for identifying marginalised groups in primary care Pharmacist Impact on First-Line Antihypertensives in African American Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1