{"title":"Effects of plasma-activated water and mild heating on Escherichia coli inactivation during wheat tempering and flour quality","authors":"Jared Rivera, Qingyang Wang, Shivaprasad Doddabematti Prakash, Deepti Salvi, Kaliramesh Siliveru","doi":"10.1002/cche.10815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Heat treatment, as a pathogen reduction step, could compromise flour quality. Plasma-activated water (PAW) is a novel pathogen reduction treatment for foods. Combining these treatments could improve pathogen inactivation during wheat tempering and maintain flour quality. This study evaluated the effects of PAW and mild heating on <i>Escherichia coli</i> inactivation during wheat tempering and wheat flour quality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p><i>E. coli</i> was inoculated into wheat grains at 6.0 ± 0.1 log CFU/g. A 5-log reduction was achieved after 6 h of tempering with PAW and heating (55°C), whereas 12 h were needed when using heating and deionized water (DI). Tempering with DI (control) and PAW alone only produced a 1-log reduction after 24 h. The PAW and PAW + heat tempering treatments produced flours with comparable yield, physicochemical, dough rheology, and bread characteristics compared to the control treatment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Mild heating and PAW tempering demonstrated a synergistic effect as it produced greater <i>E. coli</i> reductions at shorter tempering times compared to the individual treatments. The hurdle approach used in this study did not compromise flour quality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Significance and Novelty</h3>\n \n <p>The demonstrated hurdle approach can be a viable pathogen mitigation step in wheat milling which could help improve food safety of wheat-based foods.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9807,"journal":{"name":"Cereal Chemistry","volume":"101 6","pages":"1208-1223"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cereal Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cche.10815","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and Objectives
Heat treatment, as a pathogen reduction step, could compromise flour quality. Plasma-activated water (PAW) is a novel pathogen reduction treatment for foods. Combining these treatments could improve pathogen inactivation during wheat tempering and maintain flour quality. This study evaluated the effects of PAW and mild heating on Escherichia coli inactivation during wheat tempering and wheat flour quality.
Findings
E. coli was inoculated into wheat grains at 6.0 ± 0.1 log CFU/g. A 5-log reduction was achieved after 6 h of tempering with PAW and heating (55°C), whereas 12 h were needed when using heating and deionized water (DI). Tempering with DI (control) and PAW alone only produced a 1-log reduction after 24 h. The PAW and PAW + heat tempering treatments produced flours with comparable yield, physicochemical, dough rheology, and bread characteristics compared to the control treatment.
Conclusion
Mild heating and PAW tempering demonstrated a synergistic effect as it produced greater E. coli reductions at shorter tempering times compared to the individual treatments. The hurdle approach used in this study did not compromise flour quality.
Significance and Novelty
The demonstrated hurdle approach can be a viable pathogen mitigation step in wheat milling which could help improve food safety of wheat-based foods.
期刊介绍:
Cereal Chemistry publishes high-quality papers reporting novel research and significant conceptual advances in genetics, biotechnology, composition, processing, and utilization of cereal grains (barley, maize, millet, oats, rice, rye, sorghum, triticale, and wheat), pulses (beans, lentils, peas, etc.), oilseeds, and specialty crops (amaranth, flax, quinoa, etc.). Papers advancing grain science in relation to health, nutrition, pet and animal food, and safety, along with new methodologies, instrumentation, and analysis relating to these areas are welcome, as are research notes and topical review papers.
The journal generally does not accept papers that focus on nongrain ingredients, technology of a commercial or proprietary nature, or that confirm previous research without extending knowledge. Papers that describe product development should include discussion of underlying theoretical principles.