Repeat percutaneous rhizotomy for trigeminal neuralgia is not associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108466
{"title":"Repeat percutaneous rhizotomy for trigeminal neuralgia is not associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>Patients undergoing percutaneous rhizotomy for trigeminal neuralgia (TN) may require several procedures to manage their pain. However, it is not fully understood whether repeat procedures influence postoperative complication rates.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing rhizotomy at our institution from 2011 to 2022. Patients were included only if they had no history of prior interventions including microvascular decompression (MVD) or radiosurgery. We collected baseline patient information, pain characteristics, and postoperative complications for each patient. Patients were dichotomized into those undergoing primary rhizotomy versus those undergoing a repeat rhizotomy. Potential drivers of postoperative complications were included in a multivariate logistic regression model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 1904 cases reviewed, 965 met our inclusion criteria. 392 patients underwent primary rhizotomy, and 573 patients underwent repeat rhizotomies. The repeat rhizotomy group was significantly older, p&lt;0.001. Patients in the repeat rhizotomy group expressed higher frequencies of bilateral pain, p=0.01. Patients in the repeat rhizotomy group demonstrated a significantly higher rate of preoperative numbness and postoperative numbness, p&lt;0.001. There were no significant differences in any of the considered complications between the single rhizotomy and repeat rhizotomy groups. On multivariate logistic regression, repeat rhizotomy did not predict an increased risk of any postoperative complications, p=0.14.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Patients undergoing repeat rhizotomy may be at risk of postoperative numbness but are not at increased risk for postoperative complications. These results are of use to patients who are poor surgical candidates, and thus may require multiple rhizotomies to effectively manage their pain over time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10385,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846724003536","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives

Patients undergoing percutaneous rhizotomy for trigeminal neuralgia (TN) may require several procedures to manage their pain. However, it is not fully understood whether repeat procedures influence postoperative complication rates.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing rhizotomy at our institution from 2011 to 2022. Patients were included only if they had no history of prior interventions including microvascular decompression (MVD) or radiosurgery. We collected baseline patient information, pain characteristics, and postoperative complications for each patient. Patients were dichotomized into those undergoing primary rhizotomy versus those undergoing a repeat rhizotomy. Potential drivers of postoperative complications were included in a multivariate logistic regression model.

Results

Of the 1904 cases reviewed, 965 met our inclusion criteria. 392 patients underwent primary rhizotomy, and 573 patients underwent repeat rhizotomies. The repeat rhizotomy group was significantly older, p<0.001. Patients in the repeat rhizotomy group expressed higher frequencies of bilateral pain, p=0.01. Patients in the repeat rhizotomy group demonstrated a significantly higher rate of preoperative numbness and postoperative numbness, p<0.001. There were no significant differences in any of the considered complications between the single rhizotomy and repeat rhizotomy groups. On multivariate logistic regression, repeat rhizotomy did not predict an increased risk of any postoperative complications, p=0.14.

Conclusions

Patients undergoing repeat rhizotomy may be at risk of postoperative numbness but are not at increased risk for postoperative complications. These results are of use to patients who are poor surgical candidates, and thus may require multiple rhizotomies to effectively manage their pain over time.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三叉神经痛重复经皮根切术与术后并发症风险增加无关
因三叉神经痛(TN)而接受经皮根切术的患者可能需要多次手术来控制疼痛。然而,重复手术是否会影响术后并发症的发生率,目前尚不完全清楚。我们回顾性研究了 2011-2022 年期间在我院接受根切术的患者。只有既往未接受过微血管减压术(MVD)或放射外科手术等干预的患者才被纳入。我们收集了每位患者的基线信息、疼痛特征和术后并发症。我们将患者分为初次根管切开术患者和再次根管切开术患者。术后并发症的潜在驱动因素被纳入多变量逻辑回归模型。在所审查的 1904 例病例中,有 965 例符合我们的纳入标准。392名患者接受了初次根茎切除术,573名患者接受了重复根茎切除术。重复根状茎切除术组患者的年龄明显偏大,P<0.001。重复根状茎切除术组患者出现双侧疼痛的频率更高,P=0.01。重复根状茎切除术组患者术前麻木和术后麻木的比例明显更高,P<0.001。单一根状茎切除术组和重复根状茎切除术组的并发症无明显差异。在多变量逻辑回归中,重复根状茎切除术并不能预测术后并发症风险的增加,P=0.14。接受重复根状切开术的患者可能有术后麻木的风险,但术后并发症的风险并没有增加。这些结果对那些不适合手术的患者很有帮助,他们可能需要多次根状切开术才能长期有效地控制疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
358
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery is devoted to publishing papers and reports on the clinical aspects of neurology and neurosurgery. It is an international forum for papers of high scientific standard that are of interest to Neurologists and Neurosurgeons world-wide.
期刊最新文献
Pre-operative collapsed disc is a negative prognostic factor of back-pain outcome in trans-foraminal endoscopic discectomy. A single cohort clinical study Validation of a diagnostic support tool for early recognition of cervical arterial dissection in primary care Tirofiban vs. aspirin in patients with acute ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials Editorial Board Efficacy and safety of intravenous tirofiban versus standard medical treatment in acute ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1