A rapid review of the effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions for people with anxiety and/or depression living within the community

Jordan Everitt, Toby Ayres, Alesha Wale, Chukwudi Okolie, Amy Fox-McNally, Helen Morgan, Hannah Shaw, Jacob Davies, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Alison Cooper, Adrian Edwards, Ruth Lewis
{"title":"A rapid review of the effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions for people with anxiety and/or depression living within the community","authors":"Jordan Everitt, Toby Ayres, Alesha Wale, Chukwudi Okolie, Amy Fox-McNally, Helen Morgan, Hannah Shaw, Jacob Davies, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Alison Cooper, Adrian Edwards, Ruth Lewis","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.23.24310849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract\nThe Welsh Government aims to reduce smoking prevalence from the current rate of 13% to below 5% of the population by 2030. People with mental health conditions have a higher rate of smoking prevalence and are less likely to access smoking cessation services. Evidence shows that smoking cessation in this population decreases symptoms, improves positive mood and quality of life. This rapid review aimed to identify and synthesise the evidence for the effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions in people with anxiety and/or depression living in the community.\nResults\nThe literature searches were conducted in March 2024, the included study reports were published between 2008 and 2023, nine were published since 2019. Eleven primary studies from 15 reports were included in the rapid review: 10 RCTs, two of which were pilot RCTs, and one quasi-experimental pilot study. Studies were conducted in the USA (n=6), Spain (n=1), France (n=1), Netherlands (n=1), and two studies were conducted across the EU and USA.\nResearch Implications and Evidence Gaps\nNo UK studies were identified therefore it is unclear whether findings are generalisable to the UK. No studies applying interventions at critical touchpoints within smoking cessation or mental health services were identified. Only one study assessed the cost-effectiveness of a smoking cessation intervention. Only one study assessed a smoking cessation intervention in participants with anxiety. Most studies included in this review were judged to be of low quality. Most studies recruited participants from the general population, therefore it is unclear whether participants were engaged with mental health services. Further high-quality UK-based research is needed to better understand the effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions for people with anxiety and depression.","PeriodicalId":501386,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.23.24310849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The Welsh Government aims to reduce smoking prevalence from the current rate of 13% to below 5% of the population by 2030. People with mental health conditions have a higher rate of smoking prevalence and are less likely to access smoking cessation services. Evidence shows that smoking cessation in this population decreases symptoms, improves positive mood and quality of life. This rapid review aimed to identify and synthesise the evidence for the effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions in people with anxiety and/or depression living in the community. Results The literature searches were conducted in March 2024, the included study reports were published between 2008 and 2023, nine were published since 2019. Eleven primary studies from 15 reports were included in the rapid review: 10 RCTs, two of which were pilot RCTs, and one quasi-experimental pilot study. Studies were conducted in the USA (n=6), Spain (n=1), France (n=1), Netherlands (n=1), and two studies were conducted across the EU and USA. Research Implications and Evidence Gaps No UK studies were identified therefore it is unclear whether findings are generalisable to the UK. No studies applying interventions at critical touchpoints within smoking cessation or mental health services were identified. Only one study assessed the cost-effectiveness of a smoking cessation intervention. Only one study assessed a smoking cessation intervention in participants with anxiety. Most studies included in this review were judged to be of low quality. Most studies recruited participants from the general population, therefore it is unclear whether participants were engaged with mental health services. Further high-quality UK-based research is needed to better understand the effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions for people with anxiety and depression.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对社区焦虑症和/或抑郁症患者戒烟干预效果的快速审查
摘要威尔士政府的目标是到 2030 年将吸烟率从目前的 13%降至 5%以下。患有精神疾病的人吸烟率较高,而且不太可能获得戒烟服务。有证据表明,该人群戒烟可减轻症状、改善积极情绪和生活质量。本快速综述旨在确定和综合戒烟干预措施对生活在社区中的焦虑症和/或抑郁症患者的有效性证据。结果文献检索于2024年3月进行,纳入的研究报告发表于2008年至2023年之间,其中9篇发表于2019年之后。15份报告中的11项主要研究被纳入快速综述:10项研究性试验(其中2项为试验性研究性试验)和1项准实验性试验研究。研究分别在美国(n=6)、西班牙(n=1)、法国(n=1)和荷兰(n=1)进行,其中两项研究跨越欧盟和美国。没有发现在戒烟或心理健康服务的关键接触点采取干预措施的研究。只有一项研究评估了戒烟干预的成本效益。只有一项研究评估了针对焦虑参与者的戒烟干预。本综述收录的大多数研究被判定为质量较低。大多数研究从普通人群中招募参与者,因此尚不清楚参与者是否参与了心理健康服务。为了更好地了解戒烟干预对焦虑症和抑郁症患者的有效性,需要进一步开展基于英国的高质量研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"WE CAN ALL CONTRIBUTE IN OUR OWN WAY" : KNOWLEDGE MOBILIZATION TOOLS TO PROMOTE BEST PRACTICES IN UNIVERSAL ACCESSIBILITY Geospatial Analysis of the Association between Medicaid Ex-pansion, Minimum Wage Policies, and Alzheimer's Disease Dementia Prevalence in the United States The clinical and cost-effectiveness of interventions for preventing continence issues resulting from birth trauma: a rapid review Supporting women, girls and people who menstruate to participate in physical activity - Rapid evidence summary Performance of the Washington Group Questions in Measuring Blindness and Deafness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1