Rapid review of Allied Health Professionals working in neonatal services

Nathan Bromham, Leona Batten, David Jarrom, Elizabeth Gillen, Juliet Hounsome, Jacob Davies, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Alison Cooper, Adrian Edwards, Ruth Lewis
{"title":"Rapid review of Allied Health Professionals working in neonatal services","authors":"Nathan Bromham, Leona Batten, David Jarrom, Elizabeth Gillen, Juliet Hounsome, Jacob Davies, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Alison Cooper, Adrian Edwards, Ruth Lewis","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.23.24310638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nThis review aimed to quantify the impact of allied health professionals (AHPs) embedded in neonatal services on outcomes by asking the following review questions:\nQ1. What is the effectiveness of neonatal services with embedded allied health professionals compared to neonatal services without embedded allied health professionals?\nQ2. What is the effectiveness of early interventions provided by allied health professionals in neonatal units? Research Implications and Evidence Gaps\nThere was very little directly relevant evidence on AHPs embedded in neonatal services. Most of the evidence related to multidisciplinary team working or early interventions provided by AHPs. Few early intervention trials were from the UK, leading to uncertainty about the availability and applicability of interventions in the UK setting. Further UK-based research is needed to better understand the best way to integrate allied health professionals in neonatal services. Economic considerations There is no published evidence on the cost of AHPs working within neonatal units. There is marked variability in the reporting of cost estimates for neonatal care units in the UK, making the evaluation of cost implications of adopting AHP recommendations difficult. Subsequent economic evaluations could explore the Budget Impact to the NHS of increasing AHP presence in neonatal units to align with recommendations from AHP professional bodies and Royal Colleges.","PeriodicalId":501386,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Policy","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.23.24310638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background This review aimed to quantify the impact of allied health professionals (AHPs) embedded in neonatal services on outcomes by asking the following review questions: Q1. What is the effectiveness of neonatal services with embedded allied health professionals compared to neonatal services without embedded allied health professionals? Q2. What is the effectiveness of early interventions provided by allied health professionals in neonatal units? Research Implications and Evidence Gaps There was very little directly relevant evidence on AHPs embedded in neonatal services. Most of the evidence related to multidisciplinary team working or early interventions provided by AHPs. Few early intervention trials were from the UK, leading to uncertainty about the availability and applicability of interventions in the UK setting. Further UK-based research is needed to better understand the best way to integrate allied health professionals in neonatal services. Economic considerations There is no published evidence on the cost of AHPs working within neonatal units. There is marked variability in the reporting of cost estimates for neonatal care units in the UK, making the evaluation of cost implications of adopting AHP recommendations difficult. Subsequent economic evaluations could explore the Budget Impact to the NHS of increasing AHP presence in neonatal units to align with recommendations from AHP professional bodies and Royal Colleges.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新生儿服务专职医疗人员快速审查
背景本综述旨在通过提出以下综述问题,量化专职医疗人员(AHPs)嵌入新生儿服务对结果的影响:Q1.有专职医疗人员参与的新生儿服务与没有专职医疗人员参与的新生儿服务相比效果如何?新生儿科专职医疗人员提供早期干预的有效性如何?研究意义和证据差距有关新生儿服务中嵌入专职医疗人员的直接相关证据很少。大多数证据都与多学科团队工作或由助理医护人员提供的早期干预有关。来自英国的早期干预试验很少,导致干预措施在英国环境中的可用性和适用性存在不确定性。需要进一步开展基于英国的研究,以更好地了解将专职医疗人员纳入新生儿服务的最佳方式。经济方面的考虑 目前还没有关于新生儿科室中助理医护人员工作成本的公开证据。英国新生儿护理机构的成本估算报告存在明显差异,因此很难对采用AHP建议的成本影响进行评估。随后的经济评估可以探讨在新生儿病房增加 AHP 的存在对 NHS 的预算影响,以便与 AHP 专业机构和皇家学院的建议保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"WE CAN ALL CONTRIBUTE IN OUR OWN WAY" : KNOWLEDGE MOBILIZATION TOOLS TO PROMOTE BEST PRACTICES IN UNIVERSAL ACCESSIBILITY Geospatial Analysis of the Association between Medicaid Ex-pansion, Minimum Wage Policies, and Alzheimer's Disease Dementia Prevalence in the United States The clinical and cost-effectiveness of interventions for preventing continence issues resulting from birth trauma: a rapid review Supporting women, girls and people who menstruate to participate in physical activity - Rapid evidence summary Performance of the Washington Group Questions in Measuring Blindness and Deafness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1