On deep trade agreements, institutions, and global value chains: evidence from Egypt

IF 1.5 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Review of World Economics Pub Date : 2024-07-27 DOI:10.1007/s10290-024-00546-4
Fatma Aly, Chahir Zaki
{"title":"On deep trade agreements, institutions, and global value chains: evidence from Egypt","authors":"Fatma Aly, Chahir Zaki","doi":"10.1007/s10290-024-00546-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper investigates the nexus between deep trade agreements, institutional quality, and global value chains (GVCs) in Egypt. Indeed, the enforcement of deep trade agreements requires good institutions to boost GVCs. Applying a Poisson Pseudo-Maximum Likelihood (PPML) estimator to control for heteroscedasticity and zero trade flows, we use bilateral and sectoral data on Egypt’s exported Foreign Value-Added (FVA) from the Eora dataset and merge it with the Deep Trade Agreement Dataset (World Bank). The findings of the paper support the positive relationship between the depth of trade agreements and GVCs at the aggregate level. In addition, differences in the quality of institutions reduce this positive effect. However, the sectoral analysis revealed a lot of heterogeneity across different sectors. Comparing the coefficients of trade agreements for different periods, one can conclude that GVC linkages in human-capital and technology intensive products have started to respond to deep trade agreements, pointing out the agreement depth matters for exports upgrading. The results remain robust after we control for the endogeneity between GVC and the depth of trade agreements and after we use alternative measures for institutions and for the agreement depth. From a policy perspective, this paper highlights the importance of deepening agreements and improving the quality of institutions to increase the participation of African countries, including Egypt in GVCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47405,"journal":{"name":"Review of World Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of World Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-024-00546-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates the nexus between deep trade agreements, institutional quality, and global value chains (GVCs) in Egypt. Indeed, the enforcement of deep trade agreements requires good institutions to boost GVCs. Applying a Poisson Pseudo-Maximum Likelihood (PPML) estimator to control for heteroscedasticity and zero trade flows, we use bilateral and sectoral data on Egypt’s exported Foreign Value-Added (FVA) from the Eora dataset and merge it with the Deep Trade Agreement Dataset (World Bank). The findings of the paper support the positive relationship between the depth of trade agreements and GVCs at the aggregate level. In addition, differences in the quality of institutions reduce this positive effect. However, the sectoral analysis revealed a lot of heterogeneity across different sectors. Comparing the coefficients of trade agreements for different periods, one can conclude that GVC linkages in human-capital and technology intensive products have started to respond to deep trade agreements, pointing out the agreement depth matters for exports upgrading. The results remain robust after we control for the endogeneity between GVC and the depth of trade agreements and after we use alternative measures for institutions and for the agreement depth. From a policy perspective, this paper highlights the importance of deepening agreements and improving the quality of institutions to increase the participation of African countries, including Egypt in GVCs.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于深度贸易协定、机构和全球价值链:来自埃及的证据
本文研究了埃及的深度贸易协定、制度质量和全球价值链之间的关系。事实上,深度贸易协定的实施需要良好的制度来促进全球价值链的发展。为了控制异方差和零贸易流量,我们采用了泊松伪极大似然估计法(PPML),使用了 Eora 数据集中关于埃及出口外国附加值(FVA)的双边和部门数据,并将其与深度贸易协定数据集(世界银行)合并。本文的研究结果支持贸易协定深度与全球价值链在总体水平上的正相关关系。此外,机构质量的差异也降低了这种正效应。然而,部门分析表明,不同部门之间存在很多异质性。比较不同时期贸易协定的系数,可以得出结论,人力资本和技术密集型产品的全球价值链联系已开始对深度贸易协定做出反应,这表明协定深度对出口升级很重要。在我们控制了全球价值链与贸易协定深度之间的内生性之后,以及在我们使用了机构和协定深度的替代衡量标准之后,结果仍然是稳健的。从政策角度来看,本文强调了深化协定和提高机构质量对于提高包括埃及在内的非洲国家在全球价值链中的参与度的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Review of World Economics is a quarterly journal. Under the name Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, it was founded in 1913 as the world''s first journal with a focus on international economics. The Review has retained this focus, with particular emphasis on research in trade and trade policies, foreign direct investment, global supply chains, migration, international finance, currency systems and exchange rates, monetary and fiscal policies in open economies. The objective of the Review is to publish contributions of the highest quality and retain its status as one of the leading journals in international economics. Officially cited as: Rev World Econ
期刊最新文献
Gravity and trade in video on demand services Patterns of global and regional integration in the East African Community The evolution of manufacturing comparative advantage along global value chains: the amplifying role of logistics performance Trade, productivity, and services input intensity Do investors reward sovereign catastrophe bond issuance? Evidence from a panel of 26 disaster-prone countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1