Novel Co-treatment of Cooling Blowdown Water and Produced Water: A Regional Approach for Resource Recovery and Treatment Footprint Reduction

Mohammad Hafez Ahmed, Golnoosh Khajouei, Payton Seats, Karen Buzby, Harry Finklea, Nicholas Siefert, Heather Hunter, Lian-Shin Lin
{"title":"Novel Co-treatment of Cooling Blowdown Water and Produced Water: A Regional Approach for Resource Recovery and Treatment Footprint Reduction","authors":"Mohammad Hafez Ahmed, Golnoosh Khajouei, Payton Seats, Karen Buzby, Harry Finklea, Nicholas Siefert, Heather Hunter, Lian-Shin Lin","doi":"10.1021/acsestwater.4c00259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Taking advantage of the complementary chemistries of the cooling blowdown water (BDW) and produced water (PW) from shale gas production, this pilot study evaluated their co-treatment feasibility to generate useful products while reducing treatment footprints. The process includes the mixing of BDW and PW, chemical softening, activated carbon (AC) filtration, and reverse osmosis (RO). The results showed that a simple mixing of BDW and PW (BDW/PW = 5) readily removed 98% of barium and 85% of sulfate and generated a high-density (4.1 g/cm<sup>3</sup>) barite-dominant solid with a yield of 1.92 kg/m<sup>3</sup> mixed water. Softening using sodium carbonate and sodium hydroxide removed &gt;95% scale forming divalent ions, and the AC filtration resulted in ∼90% total organic carbon removal. RO treatment of the AC effluent achieved ∼60% water recovery. Compared to BDW and PW treated separately, the co-treatment process resulted in a ∼70% chemical saving. The RO concentrate had high enough TDS (77 g/L) suitable for thermal evaporation to generate commercial-grade 10-lb brine. An initial technoeconomic analysis of a co-treatment scenario using a thermoelectric powerplant in West Virginia shows cost saving potential and revenue generation. This study demonstrates the potential of the co-treatment method as a useful tool for sustainable regional water management.","PeriodicalId":7078,"journal":{"name":"ACS Es&t Water","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Es&t Water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.4c00259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Taking advantage of the complementary chemistries of the cooling blowdown water (BDW) and produced water (PW) from shale gas production, this pilot study evaluated their co-treatment feasibility to generate useful products while reducing treatment footprints. The process includes the mixing of BDW and PW, chemical softening, activated carbon (AC) filtration, and reverse osmosis (RO). The results showed that a simple mixing of BDW and PW (BDW/PW = 5) readily removed 98% of barium and 85% of sulfate and generated a high-density (4.1 g/cm3) barite-dominant solid with a yield of 1.92 kg/m3 mixed water. Softening using sodium carbonate and sodium hydroxide removed >95% scale forming divalent ions, and the AC filtration resulted in ∼90% total organic carbon removal. RO treatment of the AC effluent achieved ∼60% water recovery. Compared to BDW and PW treated separately, the co-treatment process resulted in a ∼70% chemical saving. The RO concentrate had high enough TDS (77 g/L) suitable for thermal evaporation to generate commercial-grade 10-lb brine. An initial technoeconomic analysis of a co-treatment scenario using a thermoelectric powerplant in West Virginia shows cost saving potential and revenue generation. This study demonstrates the potential of the co-treatment method as a useful tool for sustainable regional water management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冷却排污水与采出水的新型协同处理:资源回收和减少处理足迹的区域方法
利用页岩气生产过程中产生的冷却排污水(BDW)和采出水(PW)的互补化学性质,该试验研究评估了它们进行协同处理的可行性,以生成有用的产品,同时减少处理足迹。该工艺包括混合 BDW 和 PW、化学软化、活性炭 (AC) 过滤和反渗透 (RO)。结果表明,简单地混合 BDW 和 PW(BDW/PW = 5)可轻松去除 98% 的钡和 85% 的硫酸盐,并生成高密度(4.1 g/cm3)重晶石为主的固体,混合水的产量为 1.92 kg/m3。使用碳酸钠和氢氧化钠软化可去除 95% 的成垢二价离子,交流过滤可去除 90% 的总有机碳。AC 出水的反渗透处理实现了 ∼ 60% 的水回收率。与分别处理 BDW 和 PW 相比,联合处理工艺节省了 70% 的化学药剂。反渗透浓缩物的 TDS(77 克/升)足够高,适合热蒸发生成商业级 10 磅盐水。对使用西弗吉尼亚州热电厂的协同处理方案进行的初步技术经济分析表明,该方案具有节约成本和创造收入的潜力。这项研究表明,协同处理方法具有作为可持续区域水资源管理的有用工具的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Evolution Mechanism of the Water Supply System in the Water Receiving Area of a Water Diversion Project Inspired by Dissipative Structure Theory Defect Engineered 2D Graphitic Carbon Nitride for Photochemical, (Bio)Electrochemical, and Microplastic Remediation Advancements Facile Synthesis of ZIF-67-Incorporated Electrospun PVA Nanofibers Composite for Efficient Pb (II) Adsorption from Water: Docking and Experimental Studies Occurrence and Removal Efficiency of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) in Wastewater Treatment Plants: A Systematic Review from Southeast Asia Electrochemical In Situ Production of Magnetite for the Removal of Se from Wastewater
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1