Examining the existence of twin deficits in Bolivia

IF 2.7 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS International Journal of Emerging Markets Pub Date : 2024-07-29 DOI:10.1108/ijoem-01-2023-0043
Fabiola Saavedra-Caballero, Alfredo Villca
{"title":"Examining the existence of twin deficits in Bolivia","authors":"Fabiola Saavedra-Caballero, Alfredo Villca","doi":"10.1108/ijoem-01-2023-0043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>We examine the twin deficits and the direction of its movement for the case of Bolivia, a natural resource-dependent country, using the database of (Kehoe <em>et al</em>., 2019) from 1960 to 2019.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>We combine a structural vector autoregression (SVAR) model with a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) model to understand the transmission mechanisms.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Our results suggest the existence of twin deficits in Bolivia; however, causality in the Mundell-Fleming sense does not hold. While fiscal policy shocks explain current account deficits, current account shocks have a stronger effect over fiscal deficit. In fact, only 23% of the variance of current account forecast errors is explained by fiscal policy shocks; in contrast, 45% of the variance of the fiscal deficit is explained by current account shocks.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The study is for a specific case, which is a limitation; however, other country samples can be included.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>Based on the results of the work, policies can be recommended and designed to cushion the effects of external shocks.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>According to the literature available for the Bolivian case, our work constitutes a significant contribution and, therefore, is original for this specific case.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47381,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emerging Markets","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emerging Markets","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoem-01-2023-0043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

We examine the twin deficits and the direction of its movement for the case of Bolivia, a natural resource-dependent country, using the database of (Kehoe et al., 2019) from 1960 to 2019.

Design/methodology/approach

We combine a structural vector autoregression (SVAR) model with a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) model to understand the transmission mechanisms.

Findings

Our results suggest the existence of twin deficits in Bolivia; however, causality in the Mundell-Fleming sense does not hold. While fiscal policy shocks explain current account deficits, current account shocks have a stronger effect over fiscal deficit. In fact, only 23% of the variance of current account forecast errors is explained by fiscal policy shocks; in contrast, 45% of the variance of the fiscal deficit is explained by current account shocks.

Research limitations/implications

The study is for a specific case, which is a limitation; however, other country samples can be included.

Practical implications

Based on the results of the work, policies can be recommended and designed to cushion the effects of external shocks.

Originality/value

According to the literature available for the Bolivian case, our work constitutes a significant contribution and, therefore, is original for this specific case.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究玻利维亚是否存在双赤字问题
目的我们利用(Kehoe et al.,2019)的数据库研究了玻利维亚(一个自然资源依赖型国家)从 1960 年到 2019 年的双赤字及其变动方向。虽然财政政策冲击可以解释经常账户赤字,但经常账户冲击对财政赤字的影响更大。事实上,财政政策冲击只解释了 23% 的经常账户预测误差方差;相比之下,经常账户冲击解释了 45% 的财政赤字方差。原创性/价值根据有关玻利维亚案例的现有文献,我们的工作是一项重大贡献,因此,对于这一特定案例而言,我们的工作具有原创性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
206
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of aggregate and sectoral time-varying market efficiency in the Russian stock market during the COVID-19 outbreak and the Russia–Ukraine conflict (RUC) Run, not walk: advanced red queen effect and mutual forbearance effect in multimarket contact Revisiting oil-stock nexus in the time of health crisis: a wavelet approach Rhetorical strategies in the climate change disclosures of Bangladeshi banking companies Exploring panic buying as a situational response – the role of fear, media exposure and context-specific paranoia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1