Evaluating the performance of spherical, hemispherical, and tubular solar stills with various configurations - A detailed review

Faiz T Jodah, Wissam H Alawee, Hayder A Dhahad, ZM Omara
{"title":"Evaluating the performance of spherical, hemispherical, and tubular solar stills with various configurations - A detailed review","authors":"Faiz T Jodah, Wissam H Alawee, Hayder A Dhahad, ZM Omara","doi":"10.1177/09576509241266284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Solving global water shortages has become an urgent challenge, hindering sustainable development. Therefore, comparing different solar still designs from application and economic perspectives is necessary. Solar distillation is considered a major innovation in the alternative energy sector for purifying brackish or brine water into clean water. Despite the extensive literature on improved solar stills, determining the most efficient designs for residential and industrial applications remains difficult. This review compares the productivity of spherical, hemispherical, and tubular solar still designs. The aim is to study the factors that influence the efficiency of each type and to analyze recent research and results obtained under different conditions. The results show that innovations in solar distillation design can take many forms to improve efficiency and productivity. For example, adding parabolic mirrors can increase productivity in spherical, hemispherical, and tubular stills by 35 to 70%. Likewise, innovative designs such as rotating spheres and changing bowl shapes significantly increased the productivity of spherical and hemispherical stills. Likewise, retrofitting a still with vacuum generation technology can significantly increase yields by 50 to 70%. In addition, using nanomaterials, especially nanophase change materials (NPCM), has increased the efficiency of the spherical and tubular stills by 116.5%, producing 7.62 kg/m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> per day. Therefore, the NPCM-equipped model was still the most efficient option among the three designs.","PeriodicalId":20705,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09576509241266284","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Solving global water shortages has become an urgent challenge, hindering sustainable development. Therefore, comparing different solar still designs from application and economic perspectives is necessary. Solar distillation is considered a major innovation in the alternative energy sector for purifying brackish or brine water into clean water. Despite the extensive literature on improved solar stills, determining the most efficient designs for residential and industrial applications remains difficult. This review compares the productivity of spherical, hemispherical, and tubular solar still designs. The aim is to study the factors that influence the efficiency of each type and to analyze recent research and results obtained under different conditions. The results show that innovations in solar distillation design can take many forms to improve efficiency and productivity. For example, adding parabolic mirrors can increase productivity in spherical, hemispherical, and tubular stills by 35 to 70%. Likewise, innovative designs such as rotating spheres and changing bowl shapes significantly increased the productivity of spherical and hemispherical stills. Likewise, retrofitting a still with vacuum generation technology can significantly increase yields by 50 to 70%. In addition, using nanomaterials, especially nanophase change materials (NPCM), has increased the efficiency of the spherical and tubular stills by 116.5%, producing 7.62 kg/m2 per day. Therefore, the NPCM-equipped model was still the most efficient option among the three designs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估各种配置的球形、半球形和管状太阳能蒸馏器的性能--详细审查
解决全球水资源短缺问题已成为阻碍可持续发展的一项紧迫挑战。因此,有必要从应用和经济角度对不同的太阳能蒸馏器设计进行比较。太阳能蒸馏被认为是替代能源领域的一项重大创新,可将苦咸水或盐水净化成清洁水。尽管有大量关于改进型太阳能蒸馏器的文献,但为住宅和工业应用确定最有效的设计仍然困难重重。本综述比较了球形、半球形和管状太阳能蒸馏器设计的生产率。目的是研究影响每种类型效率的因素,并分析最近的研究和在不同条件下取得的成果。研究结果表明,太阳能蒸馏设计的创新可以采取多种形式来提高效率和生产率。例如,增加抛物面反射镜可将球形、半球形和管状蒸馏器的生产率提高 35% 至 70%。同样,旋转球体和改变碗形等创新设计也大大提高了球形和半球形蒸馏器的生产率。同样,利用真空发生技术改造蒸馏器可将产量大幅提高 50% 至 70%。此外,使用纳米材料,特别是纳米相变材料(NPCM),使球形和管状蒸馏器的效率提高了 116.5%,日产量达到 7.62 公斤/平方米。因此,在三种设计中,配备 NPCM 的模型仍然是效率最高的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
114
审稿时长
5.4 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Power and Energy, Part A of the Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, is dedicated to publishing peer-reviewed papers of high scientific quality on all aspects of the technology of energy conversion systems.
期刊最新文献
Studies on fuels and engine attributes powered by bio-diesel and bio-oil derived from stone apple seed (Aegle marmelos) for bioenergy Analysis of the aerothermal performance of modern commercial high-pressure turbine rotors using different levels of fidelity Analytical modeling and performance improvement of an electric two-stage centrifugal compressor for fuel cell vehicles Investigations into rubbing wear behavior of honeycomb land against labyrinth fin with periodic-cell model Secondary air induced flow structures and their interplay with the temperature field in fixed bed combustors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1