Theorising Later-Career as a Basis for Enhancing Inclusion and Extending Working Lives Through Human Resource Development

IF 4.6 3区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Human Resource Development Review Pub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI:10.1177/15344843241269166
Russell P Warhurst, Kate Black
{"title":"Theorising Later-Career as a Basis for Enhancing Inclusion and Extending Working Lives Through Human Resource Development","authors":"Russell P Warhurst, Kate Black","doi":"10.1177/15344843241269166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Population ageing in developed economies has prompted national level policies for extending working lives (EWL). However, these policies have typically failed to reduce age discrimination or premature workforce exit. Therefore, organisational policies for EWL are currently to the fore and human resource development (HRD) ‘activation’ policies are evaluated here. However, these policies are found to be of only limited effectiveness in ensuring social justice, equity, and inclusion in later-career and beyond. A Critical-HRD lens is adopted to show how the established HRD narrative of lifelong learning can inadvertently contribute to workers being disadvantaged in later-career. Social-constructionist identity theorising is developed to better understand later-career and to explain older-workers’ behaviour. The theorisation is then applied to discuss HRD interventions with potential for developing a positive sense-of-self among older-workers and retirees to thereby improve equity, inclusion, and social justice. Implications for HRD researchers and professionals and for HRD policy for EWLs are detailed.","PeriodicalId":51474,"journal":{"name":"Human Resource Development Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Resource Development Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843241269166","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Population ageing in developed economies has prompted national level policies for extending working lives (EWL). However, these policies have typically failed to reduce age discrimination or premature workforce exit. Therefore, organisational policies for EWL are currently to the fore and human resource development (HRD) ‘activation’ policies are evaluated here. However, these policies are found to be of only limited effectiveness in ensuring social justice, equity, and inclusion in later-career and beyond. A Critical-HRD lens is adopted to show how the established HRD narrative of lifelong learning can inadvertently contribute to workers being disadvantaged in later-career. Social-constructionist identity theorising is developed to better understand later-career and to explain older-workers’ behaviour. The theorisation is then applied to discuss HRD interventions with potential for developing a positive sense-of-self among older-workers and retirees to thereby improve equity, inclusion, and social justice. Implications for HRD researchers and professionals and for HRD policy for EWLs are detailed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将晚年职业生涯理论化作为通过人力资源开发增强包容性和延长工作寿命的基础
发达经济体的人口老龄化促使各国制定了延长工作寿命(EWL)的政策。然而,这些政策通常未能减少年龄歧视或过早退出劳动力队伍。因此,延长工作寿命的组织政策目前受到重视,本文对人力资源开发(HRD)"激活 "政策进行了评估。然而,我们发现这些政策在确保职业生涯后期及以后的社会公正、公平和包容方面效果有限。本文采用了批判性人力资源开发视角,以说明既定的终身学习人力资源开发叙事如何在无意中导致工人在职业生涯后期处于不利地位。社会建构主义身份理论的提出,是为了更好地理解晚年职业生涯并解释老年工作者的行为。然后将该理论应用于讨论人力资源开发干预措施,这些措施有可能在老年工人和退休人员中培养积极的自我意识,从而改善公平、包容和社会正义。详细阐述了对人力资源开发研究人员和专业人员以及针对老年妇女和退休人员的人力资源开发政策的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
17.20%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: As described elsewhere, Human Resource Development Review is a theory development journal for scholars of human resource development and related disciplines. Human Resource Development Review publishes articles that make theoretical contributions on theory development, foundations of HRD, theory building methods, and integrative reviews of the relevant literature. Papers whose central focus is empirical findings, including empirical method and design are not considered for publication in Human Resource Development Review. This journal encourages submissions that provide new theoretical insights to advance our understanding of human resource development and related disciplines. Such papers may include syntheses of existing bodies of theory, new substantive theories, exploratory conceptual models, taxonomies and typology developed as foundations for theory, treatises in formal theory construction, papers on the history of theory, critique of theory that includes alternative research propositions, metatheory, and integrative literature reviews with strong theoretical implications. Papers addressing foundations of HRD might address philosophies of HRD, historical foundations, definitions of the field, conceptual organization of the field, and ethical foundations. Human Resource Development Review takes a multi-paradigm view of theory building so submissions from different paradigms are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Theorising Later-Career as a Basis for Enhancing Inclusion and Extending Working Lives Through Human Resource Development Understanding Legitimacy and Social Entrepreneurship - A Structured Literature Review Past, Present, and Future of Learning Agility: A Bibliometric and Content Analysis Appreciative Inquiry: An Integrative Review of Studies in Three Disciplines Disability and Employment in the United States, 1880–1955: Implications for Human Resource Development Practice and Research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1