Evaluating mountain lion diet before and after a removal of feral horses in a semiarid environment

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Ecosphere Pub Date : 2024-07-24 DOI:10.1002/ecs2.4919
Peter C. Iacono, Kathryn A. Schoenecker, Kezia R. Manlove, Pat J. Jackson, David C. Stoner
{"title":"Evaluating mountain lion diet before and after a removal of feral horses in a semiarid environment","authors":"Peter C. Iacono,&nbsp;Kathryn A. Schoenecker,&nbsp;Kezia R. Manlove,&nbsp;Pat J. Jackson,&nbsp;David C. Stoner","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.4919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Non-native species can affect ecosystems by influencing native predator-prey dynamics. Therefore, management interventions designed to remove non-natives may inadvertently lead to increased predation on native species. Feral horses are widely distributed throughout the arid parts of western North America. A growing body of research indicates that horses can be an important prey species to mountain lions in ecosystems where they overlap. In December 2020, the Bureau of Land Management removed 455 horses from the Delamar Mountains, Nevada, USA. We leveraged this management intervention to implement a before–after–control–impact study to test hypotheses about predation on horses and native ungulates. We predicted (1) that horses would comprise an important part of the diet in this mixed-prey community, (2) following removal, the proportion of horses in the diet would decrease and native ungulates would increase, and (3) mountain lion home ranges overlapping the treatment areas would increase in response to decreased prey availability. From 2018 to 2022, we investigated 1360 clusters from 29 GPS-collared lions and identified 1056 prey items. To model the probability of a predation event (a kill), we fit a mixed-effects logistic regression model for ungulate prey as a function of lion sex, treatment area (in/out), and treatment period (pre-/post-removal). We used a log-linear regression model to evaluate changes in home range size. The most common prey were mule deer (55%), feral horses (32%), and coyotes (4%). Twenty-two of 29 lions consumed horses, although the rate of horse consumption was highly variable across individuals. Horses of both sexes and all age classes were predated. In contrast to predictions, our models detected no effect of removals on diet composition (β<sub>interaction</sub> = 0.30 ± 1.1), nor did the removal influence home range size (β<sub>interaction</sub> = 0.02 ± 0.02). Despite a 46% reduction in horse abundance, we found no evidence for prey-switching following the horse removal treatment. Removal magnitude, rapid horse immigration, and/or behavioral specialization of individual mountain lions may help explain these results. Our findings have important implications for mountain lion and feral horse management in arid environments characterized by high prey diversity, but low prey abundance.</p>","PeriodicalId":48930,"journal":{"name":"Ecosphere","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.4919","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.4919","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Non-native species can affect ecosystems by influencing native predator-prey dynamics. Therefore, management interventions designed to remove non-natives may inadvertently lead to increased predation on native species. Feral horses are widely distributed throughout the arid parts of western North America. A growing body of research indicates that horses can be an important prey species to mountain lions in ecosystems where they overlap. In December 2020, the Bureau of Land Management removed 455 horses from the Delamar Mountains, Nevada, USA. We leveraged this management intervention to implement a before–after–control–impact study to test hypotheses about predation on horses and native ungulates. We predicted (1) that horses would comprise an important part of the diet in this mixed-prey community, (2) following removal, the proportion of horses in the diet would decrease and native ungulates would increase, and (3) mountain lion home ranges overlapping the treatment areas would increase in response to decreased prey availability. From 2018 to 2022, we investigated 1360 clusters from 29 GPS-collared lions and identified 1056 prey items. To model the probability of a predation event (a kill), we fit a mixed-effects logistic regression model for ungulate prey as a function of lion sex, treatment area (in/out), and treatment period (pre-/post-removal). We used a log-linear regression model to evaluate changes in home range size. The most common prey were mule deer (55%), feral horses (32%), and coyotes (4%). Twenty-two of 29 lions consumed horses, although the rate of horse consumption was highly variable across individuals. Horses of both sexes and all age classes were predated. In contrast to predictions, our models detected no effect of removals on diet composition (βinteraction = 0.30 ± 1.1), nor did the removal influence home range size (βinteraction = 0.02 ± 0.02). Despite a 46% reduction in horse abundance, we found no evidence for prey-switching following the horse removal treatment. Removal magnitude, rapid horse immigration, and/or behavioral specialization of individual mountain lions may help explain these results. Our findings have important implications for mountain lion and feral horse management in arid environments characterized by high prey diversity, but low prey abundance.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估半干旱环境中野马迁移前后山狮的饮食情况
非本地物种可通过影响本地捕食者与猎物之间的动态关系来影响生态系统。因此,旨在清除非本地物种的管理干预措施可能会无意中导致本地物种捕食量的增加。野马广泛分布于北美西部的干旱地区。越来越多的研究表明,在两者重叠的生态系统中,马可能是山狮的重要捕食物种。2020 年 12 月,美国内华达州德拉马尔山脉的土地管理局移除了 455 匹马。我们利用这一管理干预措施,实施了一项控制影响前后的研究,以检验有关马匹和本地有蹄类动物捕食的假设。我们预测:(1)在这一混合猎物群落中,马匹将成为食物的重要组成部分;(2)移除马匹后,马匹在食物中的比例将下降,而本地有蹄类动物的比例将上升;(3)与处理区域重叠的山狮家园范围将随着猎物可用性的下降而扩大。从 2018 年到 2022 年,我们调查了 29 只 GPS 定位的山狮的 1360 个集群,确定了 1056 种猎物。为了模拟捕食事件(猎杀)发生的概率,我们拟合了一个混合效应逻辑回归模型,将ungulate猎物作为狮子性别、处理区域(内/外)和处理时期(清除前/后)的函数。我们使用对数线性回归模型来评估家园范围大小的变化。最常见的猎物是骡鹿(55%)、野马(32%)和郊狼(4%)。29 头狮子中有 22 头食用马,但不同个体食用马的比例差异很大。被捕食的马有性别之分,也有年龄之分。与预测不同的是,我们的模型没有检测到迁移对食物组成的影响(β交互作用 = 0.30 ± 1.1),也没有检测到迁移对家园范围大小的影响(β交互作用 = 0.02 ± 0.02)。尽管马的数量减少了 46%,但我们没有发现马被移除后猎物发生变化的证据。移除马的程度、马的快速迁移和/或山狮个体的行为特化可能有助于解释这些结果。我们的研究结果对于在猎物多样性高但猎物丰度低的干旱环境中管理山狮和野马具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecosphere
Ecosphere ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
378
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Ecosphere is as broad as the science of ecology itself. The journal welcomes submissions from all sub-disciplines of ecological science, as well as interdisciplinary studies relating to ecology. The journal''s goal is to provide a rapid-publication, online-only, open-access alternative to ESA''s other journals, while maintaining the rigorous standards of peer review for which ESA publications are renowned.
期刊最新文献
The importance of heuweltjie patch isolation, size, and quality for arthropods in the Succulent Karoo, South Africa Cascading effects of mammal host community composition on tick vector occurrence at the urban human–wildlife interface Correcting for measurement errors in a long-term aerial survey with auxiliary photographic data Using multiple scales of movement to highlight risk–reward strategies of coyotes (Canis latrans) in mixed-use landscapes Western spotted skunk spatial ecology in the temperate rainforests of the Pacific Northwest
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1