Chengming Zhang, Min Hu, Weidong Wu, Farrukh Kamran, Xining Wang
{"title":"Unpacking perceived risks and AI trust influences pre-service teachers’ AI acceptance: A structural equation modeling-based multi-group analysis","authors":"Chengming Zhang, Min Hu, Weidong Wu, Farrukh Kamran, Xining Wang","doi":"10.1007/s10639-024-12905-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Artificial intelligence (AI) integration in education has grown significantly recently. However, the potential risks of AI have led to educators being wary of implementing AI systems. To discover whether AI systems can be effective in the classroom in the future, it is critical to understand how risk factors (e.g., perceived safety risks, perceived privacy risks, and urban/rural differences) affect pre-service teachers’ AI acceptance. Therefore, the study aimed to (1) explore the influence of perceived risks and AI trust on pre-service teachers’ intentions to use AI-based educational applications, and (2) investigate possible variations in potential determinants of their intentions to use AI based on urban–rural differences. In this study, data from 483 pre-service teachers in China (262 from rural areas) were obtained by survey and analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and structural equation modeling-based multi-group analysis. The study’s findings demonstrated that while AI trust influenced pre-service teachers’ AI acceptance, the effect was less pronounced than perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness. Most notably, findings showed that perceived privacy and safety risks negatively influence AI trust among pre-service teachers from rural areas, which was a trend not observed in pre-service teachers from urban areas. As a result, to integrate AI-based applications into educational settings, pre-service teachers believed that the AI system must be functionally robust, user-friendly, and transparent. In addition, urban–rural differences considerably affect pre-service teachers’ AI acceptance. This study provides further relevant recommendations for educators and policymakers.</p>","PeriodicalId":51494,"journal":{"name":"Education and Information Technologies","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and Information Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12905-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) integration in education has grown significantly recently. However, the potential risks of AI have led to educators being wary of implementing AI systems. To discover whether AI systems can be effective in the classroom in the future, it is critical to understand how risk factors (e.g., perceived safety risks, perceived privacy risks, and urban/rural differences) affect pre-service teachers’ AI acceptance. Therefore, the study aimed to (1) explore the influence of perceived risks and AI trust on pre-service teachers’ intentions to use AI-based educational applications, and (2) investigate possible variations in potential determinants of their intentions to use AI based on urban–rural differences. In this study, data from 483 pre-service teachers in China (262 from rural areas) were obtained by survey and analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and structural equation modeling-based multi-group analysis. The study’s findings demonstrated that while AI trust influenced pre-service teachers’ AI acceptance, the effect was less pronounced than perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness. Most notably, findings showed that perceived privacy and safety risks negatively influence AI trust among pre-service teachers from rural areas, which was a trend not observed in pre-service teachers from urban areas. As a result, to integrate AI-based applications into educational settings, pre-service teachers believed that the AI system must be functionally robust, user-friendly, and transparent. In addition, urban–rural differences considerably affect pre-service teachers’ AI acceptance. This study provides further relevant recommendations for educators and policymakers.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Education and Information Technologies (EAIT) is a platform for the range of debates and issues in the field of Computing Education as well as the many uses of information and communication technology (ICT) across many educational subjects and sectors. It probes the use of computing to improve education and learning in a variety of settings, platforms and environments.
The journal aims to provide perspectives at all levels, from the micro level of specific pedagogical approaches in Computing Education and applications or instances of use in classrooms, to macro concerns of national policies and major projects; from pre-school classes to adults in tertiary institutions; from teachers and administrators to researchers and designers; from institutions to online and lifelong learning. The journal is embedded in the research and practice of professionals within the contemporary global context and its breadth and scope encourage debate on fundamental issues at all levels and from different research paradigms and learning theories. The journal does not proselytize on behalf of the technologies (whether they be mobile, desktop, interactive, virtual, games-based or learning management systems) but rather provokes debate on all the complex relationships within and between computing and education, whether they are in informal or formal settings. It probes state of the art technologies in Computing Education and it also considers the design and evaluation of digital educational artefacts. The journal aims to maintain and expand its international standing by careful selection on merit of the papers submitted, thus providing a credible ongoing forum for debate and scholarly discourse. Special Issues are occasionally published to cover particular issues in depth. EAIT invites readers to submit papers that draw inferences, probe theory and create new knowledge that informs practice, policy and scholarship. Readers are also invited to comment and reflect upon the argument and opinions published. EAIT is the official journal of the Technical Committee on Education of the International Federation for Information Processing (IFIP) in partnership with UNESCO.