Unpacking perceived risks and AI trust influences pre-service teachers’ AI acceptance: A structural equation modeling-based multi-group analysis

IF 4.8 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Education and Information Technologies Pub Date : 2024-07-27 DOI:10.1007/s10639-024-12905-7
Chengming Zhang, Min Hu, Weidong Wu, Farrukh Kamran, Xining Wang
{"title":"Unpacking perceived risks and AI trust influences pre-service teachers’ AI acceptance: A structural equation modeling-based multi-group analysis","authors":"Chengming Zhang, Min Hu, Weidong Wu, Farrukh Kamran, Xining Wang","doi":"10.1007/s10639-024-12905-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Artificial intelligence (AI) integration in education has grown significantly recently. However, the potential risks of AI have led to educators being wary of implementing AI systems. To discover whether AI systems can be effective in the classroom in the future, it is critical to understand how risk factors (e.g., perceived safety risks, perceived privacy risks, and urban/rural differences) affect pre-service teachers’ AI acceptance. Therefore, the study aimed to (1) explore the influence of perceived risks and AI trust on pre-service teachers’ intentions to use AI-based educational applications, and (2) investigate possible variations in potential determinants of their intentions to use AI based on urban–rural differences. In this study, data from 483 pre-service teachers in China (262 from rural areas) were obtained by survey and analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and structural equation modeling-based multi-group analysis. The study’s findings demonstrated that while AI trust influenced pre-service teachers’ AI acceptance, the effect was less pronounced than perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness. Most notably, findings showed that perceived privacy and safety risks negatively influence AI trust among pre-service teachers from rural areas, which was a trend not observed in pre-service teachers from urban areas. As a result, to integrate AI-based applications into educational settings, pre-service teachers believed that the AI system must be functionally robust, user-friendly, and transparent. In addition, urban–rural differences considerably affect pre-service teachers’ AI acceptance. This study provides further relevant recommendations for educators and policymakers.</p>","PeriodicalId":51494,"journal":{"name":"Education and Information Technologies","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and Information Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12905-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) integration in education has grown significantly recently. However, the potential risks of AI have led to educators being wary of implementing AI systems. To discover whether AI systems can be effective in the classroom in the future, it is critical to understand how risk factors (e.g., perceived safety risks, perceived privacy risks, and urban/rural differences) affect pre-service teachers’ AI acceptance. Therefore, the study aimed to (1) explore the influence of perceived risks and AI trust on pre-service teachers’ intentions to use AI-based educational applications, and (2) investigate possible variations in potential determinants of their intentions to use AI based on urban–rural differences. In this study, data from 483 pre-service teachers in China (262 from rural areas) were obtained by survey and analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and structural equation modeling-based multi-group analysis. The study’s findings demonstrated that while AI trust influenced pre-service teachers’ AI acceptance, the effect was less pronounced than perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness. Most notably, findings showed that perceived privacy and safety risks negatively influence AI trust among pre-service teachers from rural areas, which was a trend not observed in pre-service teachers from urban areas. As a result, to integrate AI-based applications into educational settings, pre-service teachers believed that the AI system must be functionally robust, user-friendly, and transparent. In addition, urban–rural differences considerably affect pre-service teachers’ AI acceptance. This study provides further relevant recommendations for educators and policymakers.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解读认知风险和人工智能信任对职前教师接受人工智能的影响:基于结构方程建模的多组分析
人工智能(AI)与教育的结合近来有了显著发展。然而,人工智能的潜在风险导致教育工作者对实施人工智能系统持谨慎态度。为了探究人工智能系统是否能在未来的课堂中发挥有效作用,了解风险因素(如感知到的安全风险、感知到的隐私风险和城乡差异)对职前教师接受人工智能的影响至关重要。因此,本研究旨在:(1)探讨感知风险和人工智能信任对职前教师使用基于人工智能的教育应用意向的影响;(2)调查基于城乡差异的职前教师使用人工智能意向的潜在决定因素的可能差异。本研究通过调查获得了中国 483 名职前教师(其中 262 名来自农村地区)的数据,并采用确认性因素分析法(CFA)和基于结构方程建模的多组分析法对数据进行了分析。研究结果表明,虽然人工智能的信任度影响了职前教师对人工智能的接受度,但这种影响不如感知易用性和感知有用性明显。最值得注意的是,研究结果表明,感知到的隐私和安全风险对农村地区职前教师的人工智能信任度有负面影响,而这一趋势在城市地区的职前教师中没有观察到。因此,要将基于人工智能的应用融入教育环境,职前教师认为人工智能系统必须功能强大、用户友好且透明。此外,城乡差异也在很大程度上影响了职前教师对人工智能的接受程度。本研究为教育工作者和政策制定者提供了进一步的相关建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Education and Information Technologies
Education and Information Technologies EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.70%
发文量
610
期刊介绍: The Journal of Education and Information Technologies (EAIT) is a platform for the range of debates and issues in the field of Computing Education as well as the many uses of information and communication technology (ICT) across many educational subjects and sectors. It probes the use of computing to improve education and learning in a variety of settings, platforms and environments. The journal aims to provide perspectives at all levels, from the micro level of specific pedagogical approaches in Computing Education and applications or instances of use in classrooms, to macro concerns of national policies and major projects; from pre-school classes to adults in tertiary institutions; from teachers and administrators to researchers and designers; from institutions to online and lifelong learning. The journal is embedded in the research and practice of professionals within the contemporary global context and its breadth and scope encourage debate on fundamental issues at all levels and from different research paradigms and learning theories. The journal does not proselytize on behalf of the technologies (whether they be mobile, desktop, interactive, virtual, games-based or learning management systems) but rather provokes debate on all the complex relationships within and between computing and education, whether they are in informal or formal settings. It probes state of the art technologies in Computing Education and it also considers the design and evaluation of digital educational artefacts.  The journal aims to maintain and expand its international standing by careful selection on merit of the papers submitted, thus providing a credible ongoing forum for debate and scholarly discourse. Special Issues are occasionally published to cover particular issues in depth. EAIT invites readers to submit papers that draw inferences, probe theory and create new knowledge that informs practice, policy and scholarship. Readers are also invited to comment and reflect upon the argument and opinions published. EAIT is the official journal of the Technical Committee on Education of the International Federation for Information Processing (IFIP) in partnership with UNESCO.
期刊最新文献
Development of a virtual reality creative enhancement system utilizing haptic vibration feedback via electroencephalography Is ChatGPT like a nine-year-old child in theory of mind? Evidence from Chinese writing Analysing factors influencing undergraduates’ adoption of intelligent physical education systems using an expanded TAM The importance of aligning instructor age with learning content in designing instructional videos for older adults Evaluating classroom response systems in engineering education: Which metrics better reflect student performance?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1