Revisiting the relationship between economic freedom and development to account for statistical deception by autocratic regimes

IF 2.3 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS European Journal of Political Economy Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2024.102577
Sean P. Alvarez , Vincent Geloso , Macy Scheck
{"title":"Revisiting the relationship between economic freedom and development to account for statistical deception by autocratic regimes","authors":"Sean P. Alvarez ,&nbsp;Vincent Geloso ,&nbsp;Macy Scheck","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2024.102577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The literature connecting economic freedom indexes to income levels and growth generally points in the direction of a positive association. In this paper, we argue that this finding is a conservative one as the data is biased against finding <em>any</em> effects. The bias emerges as a result of the tendency of dictatorial regimes to overstate their GDP level. Dictatorships also tend to have lower scores of economic freedom. This downwardly biases any estimations of the relation between income and economic freedom. In this paper, we use recent corrections to GDP numbers – based on nighttime light intensity – to estimate the bias. We find that the true effects of economic freedom on income levels are between 1.1 and 1.62 times greater than commonly estimated. For economic growth, the bias is far smaller. Finally, we find suggestive evidence that the relationship between changes in economic freedom and economic growth is being underestimated as a result of the lies of dictators regarding GDP.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51439,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Political Economy","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 102577"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S017626802400079X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The literature connecting economic freedom indexes to income levels and growth generally points in the direction of a positive association. In this paper, we argue that this finding is a conservative one as the data is biased against finding any effects. The bias emerges as a result of the tendency of dictatorial regimes to overstate their GDP level. Dictatorships also tend to have lower scores of economic freedom. This downwardly biases any estimations of the relation between income and economic freedom. In this paper, we use recent corrections to GDP numbers – based on nighttime light intensity – to estimate the bias. We find that the true effects of economic freedom on income levels are between 1.1 and 1.62 times greater than commonly estimated. For economic growth, the bias is far smaller. Finally, we find suggestive evidence that the relationship between changes in economic freedom and economic growth is being underestimated as a result of the lies of dictators regarding GDP.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新审视经济自由与发展之间的关系,以解释专制政权的统计欺骗行为
将经济自由度指数与收入水平和增长联系起来的文献一般都指向正相关的方向。在本文中,我们认为这一结论是保守的,因为数据对发现效应存在偏差。出现这种偏差的原因是独裁政权倾向于夸大其国内生产总值水平。独裁政权的经济自由度也往往较低。这使得对收入与经济自由之间关系的任何估计都存在向下的偏差。在本文中,我们利用最近根据夜间光照强度对 GDP 数据进行的修正来估计这种偏差。我们发现,经济自由对收入水平的真实影响是通常估计值的 1.1 到 1.62 倍。就经济增长而言,偏差要小得多。最后,我们发现有暗示性证据表明,由于独裁者在国内生产总值方面的谎言,经济自由度的变化与经济增长之间的关系被低估了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: The aim of the European Journal of Political Economy is to disseminate original theoretical and empirical research on economic phenomena within a scope that encompasses collective decision making, political behavior, and the role of institutions. Contributions are invited from the international community of researchers. Manuscripts must be published in English. Starting 2008, the European Journal of Political Economy is indexed in the Social Sciences Citation Index published by Thomson Scientific (formerly ISI).
期刊最新文献
Wealth inequality and mega events The evolution of affluent support for redistribution in Germany in the context of rising inequalities Macroeconomic effects from media coverage of the China–U.S. trade war on selected EU countries Political alliances and trade: Europe in a polarized world Beyond the party push: Gender differences in voters’ persuasion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1