Globalization and fiscal policy after financial crises

IF 2.3 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS European Journal of Political Economy Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2024.102590
Paraskevi K. Salamaliki
{"title":"Globalization and fiscal policy after financial crises","authors":"Paraskevi K. Salamaliki","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2024.102590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Has globalization affected the use of fiscal policy as a macroeconomic stabilization tool in response to financial crises? We study this question in an empirical model using different dimensions of globalization – political, social, and economic – and <em>de facto</em> and <em>de jure</em> measures of the different dimensions. By estimating Jordà (2005)-type local projections, we first document that higher political, social and economic globalization matter for the policy response to financial crises, producing more contractionary or austerity policies in terms of the high-employment surplus after distress. High initial debt-to-GDP ratios exacerbate to some extent the effects of globalization, producing additional fiscal austerity after financial distress. Second, we find that countries’ degree of policies and conditions that enable or restrict international flows and activities – hence policies “on paper” – matter most for the effects of globalization on the dynamics of fiscal policy after a financial distress, compared to the actual degree of such flows, that is, policies “in practice”. In total, using of fiscal policy as a macro stabilization tool in an environment of increased globalization appears to be restricted. Accommodation and reinforcement of debt externalities, fiscal spillovers and contagion ensuing from increased globalization may have contributed to policymakers’ concerns about debt sustainability and sovereign risk, thus influencing the fiscal policy response.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51439,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Political Economy","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 102590"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0176268024000922","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Has globalization affected the use of fiscal policy as a macroeconomic stabilization tool in response to financial crises? We study this question in an empirical model using different dimensions of globalization – political, social, and economic – and de facto and de jure measures of the different dimensions. By estimating Jordà (2005)-type local projections, we first document that higher political, social and economic globalization matter for the policy response to financial crises, producing more contractionary or austerity policies in terms of the high-employment surplus after distress. High initial debt-to-GDP ratios exacerbate to some extent the effects of globalization, producing additional fiscal austerity after financial distress. Second, we find that countries’ degree of policies and conditions that enable or restrict international flows and activities – hence policies “on paper” – matter most for the effects of globalization on the dynamics of fiscal policy after a financial distress, compared to the actual degree of such flows, that is, policies “in practice”. In total, using of fiscal policy as a macro stabilization tool in an environment of increased globalization appears to be restricted. Accommodation and reinforcement of debt externalities, fiscal spillovers and contagion ensuing from increased globalization may have contributed to policymakers’ concerns about debt sustainability and sovereign risk, thus influencing the fiscal policy response.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
金融危机后的全球化和财政政策
全球化是否影响了利用财政政策作为宏观经济稳定工具来应对金融危机?我们在一个实证模型中利用全球化的不同维度(政治、社会和经济)以及不同维度的衡量标准来研究这个问题。通过估计 Jordà(2005 年)类型的本地预测,我们首先记录了较高的政治、社会和经济全球化对金融危机的政策反应的影响,在危机后的高就业盈余方面产生了更多的收缩或紧缩政策。初始债务与国内生产总值(GDP)的高比率在一定程度上加剧了全球化的影响,在金融危机后产生了额外的财政紧缩政策。其次,我们发现,与国际流动的实际程度(即 "实践中 "的政策)相比,各国促进或限制国际流动和活动的政策和条件的程度(即 "纸面上 "的政策)对全球化对金融危机后财政政策动态的影响最为重要。总之,在全球化加剧的环境中,财政政策作为宏观稳定工具的使用似乎受到限制。全球化加剧所带来的债务外部性、财政溢出效应和传染效应的缓解和加强,可能加剧了决策者对债务可持续性和主权风险的担忧,从而影响了财政政策的应对。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: The aim of the European Journal of Political Economy is to disseminate original theoretical and empirical research on economic phenomena within a scope that encompasses collective decision making, political behavior, and the role of institutions. Contributions are invited from the international community of researchers. Manuscripts must be published in English. Starting 2008, the European Journal of Political Economy is indexed in the Social Sciences Citation Index published by Thomson Scientific (formerly ISI).
期刊最新文献
Wealth inequality and mega events The evolution of affluent support for redistribution in Germany in the context of rising inequalities Macroeconomic effects from media coverage of the China–U.S. trade war on selected EU countries Political alliances and trade: Europe in a polarized world Beyond the party push: Gender differences in voters’ persuasion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1