A field survey on the dietary use of traditional Chinese medicine in selected regions with the Cantonese, Hakka, and Teochew populations in Guangdong province, China

IF 3.5 2区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Science & Nutrition Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1002/fsn3.4295
Jie‐wen Peng, Shao‐wei Chen, Ping Wang, Rui Huang, Qing Li, Zi‐hui Chen
{"title":"A field survey on the dietary use of traditional Chinese medicine in selected regions with the Cantonese, Hakka, and Teochew populations in Guangdong province, China","authors":"Jie‐wen Peng, Shao‐wei Chen, Ping Wang, Rui Huang, Qing Li, Zi‐hui Chen","doi":"10.1002/fsn3.4295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to assess the dietary consumption patterns of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) among the population in Guangdong province. Employing a cross‐sectional design, the survey was conducted from 2019 to 2021 to examine the inclusion of TCM in the diet of participants in Guangdong province. Information regarding consumption of TCM during the preceding 12 months was collected using a food frequency questionnaire. The participant cohort comprised a total of 3031 participants, consisting of 1081 Cantonese, 967 Hakka, and 983 Teochew individuals. The survey included 42 TCM, with consumption rates ranging from 2.6% to 47.3%. The top five TCM comprised Citri Reticulatae Pericarpium (47.3%), Lonicerae Japonicae Flos (47.0%), Codonopsis Radix (46.4%), Polygonati Odorati Rhizoma (43.1%), and Siraitiae Fructus (41.5%), along with Panacis Quinquefolii Radix (41.5%). These TCM possess recognized therapeutic properties within TCM for clearing heat, drying dampness, and detoxification. Within the top decile of 10 TCM, only Lonicerae Japonicae Flos was ubiquitous across all three sub‐populations. Nonetheless, 11 TCM from the top 20 and 17 TCM from the top 30 overlapped among the three sub‐populations. The study revealed substantial variability in the consumption rates of different TCM. Notably, those with traditional Chinese medicine effects of clearing heat, drying dampness, and detoxification exhibited higher consumption rates. Disparities in the consumption rates of these TCM were noted among the Cantonese, Hakka, and Teochew populations.","PeriodicalId":12418,"journal":{"name":"Food Science & Nutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Science & Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.4295","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the dietary consumption patterns of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) among the population in Guangdong province. Employing a cross‐sectional design, the survey was conducted from 2019 to 2021 to examine the inclusion of TCM in the diet of participants in Guangdong province. Information regarding consumption of TCM during the preceding 12 months was collected using a food frequency questionnaire. The participant cohort comprised a total of 3031 participants, consisting of 1081 Cantonese, 967 Hakka, and 983 Teochew individuals. The survey included 42 TCM, with consumption rates ranging from 2.6% to 47.3%. The top five TCM comprised Citri Reticulatae Pericarpium (47.3%), Lonicerae Japonicae Flos (47.0%), Codonopsis Radix (46.4%), Polygonati Odorati Rhizoma (43.1%), and Siraitiae Fructus (41.5%), along with Panacis Quinquefolii Radix (41.5%). These TCM possess recognized therapeutic properties within TCM for clearing heat, drying dampness, and detoxification. Within the top decile of 10 TCM, only Lonicerae Japonicae Flos was ubiquitous across all three sub‐populations. Nonetheless, 11 TCM from the top 20 and 17 TCM from the top 30 overlapped among the three sub‐populations. The study revealed substantial variability in the consumption rates of different TCM. Notably, those with traditional Chinese medicine effects of clearing heat, drying dampness, and detoxification exhibited higher consumption rates. Disparities in the consumption rates of these TCM were noted among the Cantonese, Hakka, and Teochew populations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国广东省广东人、客家人和潮州人膳食使用传统中药情况的实地调查
本研究旨在评估广东省居民的中药膳食消费模式。调查采用横断面设计,于2019年至2021年期间进行,以了解广东省参与者在膳食中摄入中药的情况。调查采用食物频率问卷的形式,收集了参与者在过去12个月中的中药消费信息。参与调查者共3031人,其中广东人1081人,客家人967人,潮州人983人。调查包括 42 种中药,食用率从 2.6% 到 47.3% 不等。排名前五位的中药包括:陈皮(47.3%)、忍冬藤(47.0%)、党参(46.4%)、何首乌(43.1%)、四逆散(41.5%)以及板蓝根(41.5%)。这些中药具有中医公认的清热、燥湿、解毒的疗效。在前十分位数的 10 种中药中,只有日本忍冬藤在三个亚人群中普遍存在。不过,前 20 位中有 11 种中药,前 30 位中有 17 种中药在三个亚人群中有所重叠。研究显示,不同中药的消费率存在很大差异。值得注意的是,具有清热、燥湿和解毒功效的中药的服用率较高。在广东人、客家人和潮州人中,这些中药的服用率存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Science & Nutrition
Food Science & Nutrition Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
434
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Food Science & Nutrition is the peer-reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of research in all areas of food science and nutrition. The Journal will consider submissions of quality papers describing the results of fundamental and applied research related to all aspects of human food and nutrition, as well as interdisciplinary research that spans these two fields.
期刊最新文献
Cover Image Issue Information Investigation of monosodium glutamate content in flavors, seasonings, and sauces from local markets in Turkey Dietary advanced glycation end‐products (dAGEs) are not associated with the risk of cancer incidence. A systematic review and meta‐analysis of prospective cohort studies Phenolic contents and antioxidant activities of Caucasian bee propolis at different locations, solvents, and temperatures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1