Homogeneity analysis of daily precipitation series in Paraná State, Southern Brazil

IF 2.8 4区 地球科学 Q3 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Theoretical and Applied Climatology Pub Date : 2024-07-24 DOI:10.1007/s00704-024-05119-x
André Rodrigues da Silva, Bruna Forestieri Bolonhez, Hemerson Donizete Pinheiro
{"title":"Homogeneity analysis of daily precipitation series in Paraná State, Southern Brazil","authors":"André Rodrigues da Silva, Bruna Forestieri Bolonhez, Hemerson Donizete Pinheiro","doi":"10.1007/s00704-024-05119-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The analysis of extreme precipitation events plays a crucial role in the management of water resources, infrastructure, public water supply, agriculture, fire control, and public health. For an accurate characterization of precipitation events using historical series, the observed variations must be solely attributable to weather and climate conditions. This study aimed to identify homogeneous gauge stations in Paraná State, southern Brazil, based on four statistical tests (SNHT, Buishand, Pettitt, and Von Neumann) and conduct a homogeneity analysis of daily rainfall data. Missing values were imputed into the time series, and only stations with up to 25% of data gaps were included. Of the 482 stations analyzed in the state, 73.7% (<i>n</i> = 355) demonstrated homogeneity, 11.6% (<i>n</i> = 56) were considered doubtful, and 14.7% (<i>n</i> = 71) were deemed suspect. The highest number of homogeneity breaks was recorded from 1990 to 2005. The number of breaks during this period was estimated at 75 (59.1%) by SNHT, 86 (67.7%) by the Buishand test, and 89 (70.1%) by the Pettitt test. The year with the highest number of homogeneity breaks was 1998, with 81 breaks identified by the Pettitt test. These breaks may be related to El Niño and La Niña phenomena, given that a large sample of rainfall stations was analyzed in the study.</p>","PeriodicalId":22945,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical and Applied Climatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical and Applied Climatology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-024-05119-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The analysis of extreme precipitation events plays a crucial role in the management of water resources, infrastructure, public water supply, agriculture, fire control, and public health. For an accurate characterization of precipitation events using historical series, the observed variations must be solely attributable to weather and climate conditions. This study aimed to identify homogeneous gauge stations in Paraná State, southern Brazil, based on four statistical tests (SNHT, Buishand, Pettitt, and Von Neumann) and conduct a homogeneity analysis of daily rainfall data. Missing values were imputed into the time series, and only stations with up to 25% of data gaps were included. Of the 482 stations analyzed in the state, 73.7% (n = 355) demonstrated homogeneity, 11.6% (n = 56) were considered doubtful, and 14.7% (n = 71) were deemed suspect. The highest number of homogeneity breaks was recorded from 1990 to 2005. The number of breaks during this period was estimated at 75 (59.1%) by SNHT, 86 (67.7%) by the Buishand test, and 89 (70.1%) by the Pettitt test. The year with the highest number of homogeneity breaks was 1998, with 81 breaks identified by the Pettitt test. These breaks may be related to El Niño and La Niña phenomena, given that a large sample of rainfall stations was analyzed in the study.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西南部巴拉那州日降水量序列的同质性分析
对极端降水事件的分析在水资源管理、基础设施、公共供水、农业、消防和公共卫生方面发挥着至关重要的作用。要利用历史序列准确描述降水事件,观测到的变化必须完全归因于天气和气候条件。本研究旨在根据四种统计检验方法(SNHT、Buishand、Pettitt 和 Von Neumann)确定巴西南部巴拉那州的同质性测站,并对日降雨量数据进行同质性分析。对时间序列中的缺失值进行了估算,只有数据缺口不超过 25% 的站点才被包括在内。在该州分析的 482 个站点中,73.7%(n = 355)显示出同质性,11.6%(n = 56)被认为是可疑的,14.7%(n = 71)被认为是可疑的。1990 年至 2005 年期间,同质性破坏的数量最多。在此期间,根据 SNHT 方法估计的同质性破坏数量为 75 个(59.1%),根据 Buishand 检验方法估计的同质性破坏数量为 86 个(67.7%),根据 Pettitt 检验方法估计的同质性破坏数量为 89 个(70.1%)。同质性断裂最多的年份是 1998 年,佩蒂特检验确定了 81 个断裂。鉴于该研究分析了大量雨量站样本,这些断裂可能与厄尔尼诺和拉尼娜现象有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Theoretical and Applied Climatology
Theoretical and Applied Climatology 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
11.80%
发文量
376
审稿时长
4.3 months
期刊介绍: Theoretical and Applied Climatology covers the following topics: - climate modeling, climatic changes and climate forecasting, micro- to mesoclimate, applied meteorology as in agro- and forestmeteorology, biometeorology, building meteorology and atmospheric radiation problems as they relate to the biosphere - effects of anthropogenic and natural aerosols or gaseous trace constituents - hardware and software elements of meteorological measurements, including techniques of remote sensing
期刊最新文献
Sensitivity study of RegCM4.7 model to land surface schemes (BATS and CLM4.5) forced by MPI-ESM1.2-HR in simulating temperature and precipitation over Iran Modified data classification for extreme values in Şen’s innovative trend analysis: A comparative trend study for the Aegean and Eastern Anatolia Regions of Türkiye The influence of human activities on rainfall-runoff relationships at different time scales in the Minjiang River Basin Evaluation of precipitation temporal distribution pattern of post-processed sub-daily ECMWF forecasts Drought variability in Pakistan: Navigating historical patterns in a changing climate with global teleconnections
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1