Annabel Vetterlein , Thomas Plieger , Merlin Monzel , Svea A. Hogeterp , Lilli Wagner , Thomas Grünhage , Andrea Felten , Peter Trautner , Jana Karneboge , Martin Reuter
{"title":"Neuronal activation patterns during self-referential pain imagination","authors":"Annabel Vetterlein , Thomas Plieger , Merlin Monzel , Svea A. Hogeterp , Lilli Wagner , Thomas Grünhage , Andrea Felten , Peter Trautner , Jana Karneboge , Martin Reuter","doi":"10.1016/j.ynpai.2024.100158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In clinical assessments and pain therapy, patients are asked to imagine themselves in pain. However, the underlying neuronal processes remain poorly understood. Prior research has focused on empathy for pain or reported small sample sizes. Thus, the present study aimed to promote the neurobiological understanding of self-referential pain imagination. We hypothesised to find activation contrasts (pain vs. no pain) across pain-related areas and expected two of the most prominent predictors of chronic pain, pain sensitivity (PS) and locus of control (LoC), to be moderators.</p><p>In an fMRI study, <em>N</em> = 82 participants completed a pain imagination task, in which they were asked to imagine themselves in painful and non-painful situations presented in the form of pictures and texts. After each trial, they were instructed to give painfulness ratings. As a laboratory measure of PS, electrical pain thresholds were assessed. A questionnaire was completed to measure LoC.</p><p>Across presentation modes we found activity contrasts in previously pain-related regions, such as the prefrontal, supplementary motor, primary motor, somatosensory and posterior parietal cortices, and the cerebellum. We found positive associations of PS and external LoC with painfulness ratings, and a negative correlation between PS and internal LoC. Despite our hypotheses, neither PS nor internal LoC were significant predictors of the BOLD-signal contrasts.</p><p>Though future studies are needed to draw further conclusions, our results provide preliminary evidence of a potential neuronal imagination-perception overlap in pain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52177,"journal":{"name":"Neurobiology of Pain","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452073X24000096/pdfft?md5=8a9c2603322477b07469a22e7aeb5eea&pid=1-s2.0-S2452073X24000096-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurobiology of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452073X24000096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In clinical assessments and pain therapy, patients are asked to imagine themselves in pain. However, the underlying neuronal processes remain poorly understood. Prior research has focused on empathy for pain or reported small sample sizes. Thus, the present study aimed to promote the neurobiological understanding of self-referential pain imagination. We hypothesised to find activation contrasts (pain vs. no pain) across pain-related areas and expected two of the most prominent predictors of chronic pain, pain sensitivity (PS) and locus of control (LoC), to be moderators.
In an fMRI study, N = 82 participants completed a pain imagination task, in which they were asked to imagine themselves in painful and non-painful situations presented in the form of pictures and texts. After each trial, they were instructed to give painfulness ratings. As a laboratory measure of PS, electrical pain thresholds were assessed. A questionnaire was completed to measure LoC.
Across presentation modes we found activity contrasts in previously pain-related regions, such as the prefrontal, supplementary motor, primary motor, somatosensory and posterior parietal cortices, and the cerebellum. We found positive associations of PS and external LoC with painfulness ratings, and a negative correlation between PS and internal LoC. Despite our hypotheses, neither PS nor internal LoC were significant predictors of the BOLD-signal contrasts.
Though future studies are needed to draw further conclusions, our results provide preliminary evidence of a potential neuronal imagination-perception overlap in pain.