{"title":"On some $$\\Sigma ^{B}_{0}$$ -formulae generalizing counting principles over $$V^{0}$$","authors":"Eitetsu Ken","doi":"10.1007/s00153-024-00938-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We formalize various counting principles and compare their strengths over <span>\\(V^{0}\\)</span>. In particular, we conjecture the following mutual independence between:</p><ul>\n<li>\n<p>a uniform version of modular counting principles and the pigeonhole principle for injections,</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>a version of the oddtown theorem and modular counting principles of modulus <i>p</i>, where <i>p</i> is any natural number which is not a power of 2,</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>and a version of Fisher’s inequality and modular counting principles.</p>\n</li>\n</ul><p> Then, we give sufficient conditions to prove them. We give a variation of the notion of <i>PHP</i>-tree and <i>k</i>-evaluation to show that any Frege proof of the pigeonhole principle for injections admitting the uniform counting principle as an axiom scheme cannot have <i>o</i>(<i>n</i>)-evaluations. As for the remaining two, we utilize well-known notions of <i>p</i>-tree and <i>k</i>-evaluation and reduce the problems to the existence of certain families of polynomials witnessing violations of the corresponding combinatorial principles with low-degree Nullstellensatz proofs from the violation of the modular counting principle in concern.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-024-00938-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We formalize various counting principles and compare their strengths over \(V^{0}\). In particular, we conjecture the following mutual independence between:
a uniform version of modular counting principles and the pigeonhole principle for injections,
a version of the oddtown theorem and modular counting principles of modulus p, where p is any natural number which is not a power of 2,
and a version of Fisher’s inequality and modular counting principles.
Then, we give sufficient conditions to prove them. We give a variation of the notion of PHP-tree and k-evaluation to show that any Frege proof of the pigeonhole principle for injections admitting the uniform counting principle as an axiom scheme cannot have o(n)-evaluations. As for the remaining two, we utilize well-known notions of p-tree and k-evaluation and reduce the problems to the existence of certain families of polynomials witnessing violations of the corresponding combinatorial principles with low-degree Nullstellensatz proofs from the violation of the modular counting principle in concern.