Spatiotemporal and isotopic niche overlap among Atlantic puffins, razorbills, and common murres during the non-breeding season in the Northwest Atlantic

IF 2.2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Marine Ecology Progress Series Pub Date : 2024-07-04 DOI:10.3354/meps14614
Emily S. Runnells, William A. Montevecchi, Gail K. Davoren
{"title":"Spatiotemporal and isotopic niche overlap among Atlantic puffins, razorbills, and common murres during the non-breeding season in the Northwest Atlantic","authors":"Emily S. Runnells, William A. Montevecchi, Gail K. Davoren","doi":"10.3354/meps14614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT: Little is known about the spatial and dietary overlap of seabird species during the non-breeding season, when scarce and patchy marine food resources could lead to interspecific competition. We aimed to quantify spatiotemporal and isotopic niche overlap among common murres <i>Uria aalge</i>, razorbills <i>Alca torda</i>, and Atlantic puffins <i>Fratercula arctica</i> outside the breeding season by combining data from geolocators and stable isotope ratios (δ<sup>15</sup>N, δ<sup>13</sup>C) of belly, secondary, and head feathers collected in 2017-2020 from birds breeding in coastal northeastern Newfoundland, Canada. Seasonal utilization distributions of each species indicated generally low spatial overlap during most of the non-breeding period, with exceptions immediately post-breeding and with variability in movement paths among puffins. Stable isotope analysis revealed a broader isotopic niche (1.5 to 3×) for puffins than other species, matching their greater spatial variation. There was no isotopic niche overlap among the 3 species, except during flight feather molt of razorbills and murres. Individual puffins located in the same area as razorbills or murres had lower δ<sup>15</sup>N values, suggesting a lower trophic position. The minimal overlap of these 3 alcid species during an understudied phase of their annual cycle suggests that they segregate spatially and partition resources, implying that different spatial planning and ecosystem conservation strategies should be applied to each of these 3 species.","PeriodicalId":18193,"journal":{"name":"Marine Ecology Progress Series","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Ecology Progress Series","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3354/meps14614","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Little is known about the spatial and dietary overlap of seabird species during the non-breeding season, when scarce and patchy marine food resources could lead to interspecific competition. We aimed to quantify spatiotemporal and isotopic niche overlap among common murres Uria aalge, razorbills Alca torda, and Atlantic puffins Fratercula arctica outside the breeding season by combining data from geolocators and stable isotope ratios (δ15N, δ13C) of belly, secondary, and head feathers collected in 2017-2020 from birds breeding in coastal northeastern Newfoundland, Canada. Seasonal utilization distributions of each species indicated generally low spatial overlap during most of the non-breeding period, with exceptions immediately post-breeding and with variability in movement paths among puffins. Stable isotope analysis revealed a broader isotopic niche (1.5 to 3×) for puffins than other species, matching their greater spatial variation. There was no isotopic niche overlap among the 3 species, except during flight feather molt of razorbills and murres. Individual puffins located in the same area as razorbills or murres had lower δ15N values, suggesting a lower trophic position. The minimal overlap of these 3 alcid species during an understudied phase of their annual cycle suggests that they segregate spatially and partition resources, implying that different spatial planning and ecosystem conservation strategies should be applied to each of these 3 species.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西北大西洋非繁殖季节大西洋海鹦、矶鹞和普通海鸊之间的时空和同位素生态位重叠
摘要:人们对海鸟物种在非繁殖季节的空间和食物重叠知之甚少,因为在非繁殖季节,海洋食物资源的稀缺性和斑块性可能会导致种间竞争。我们旨在通过结合地理定位器的数据和2017-2020年从加拿大纽芬兰东北部沿海繁殖的鸟类身上采集的腹部、副羽和头部羽毛的稳定同位素比值(δ15N、δ13C),量化普通红嘴鸥(Uria aalge)、蛏子(Alca torda)和大西洋海雀(Fratercula arctica)在繁殖季节之外的时空和同位素生态位重叠情况。各物种的季节性利用分布表明,在非繁殖期的大部分时间里,空间重叠率普遍较低,但繁殖后不久的情况除外,而且海雀之间的移动路径也存在差异。稳定同位素分析表明,与其他物种相比,海雀的同位素生态位更为宽泛(1.5 至 3 倍),这与其较大的空间变化相匹配。除了在蛏和海鹦的飞行羽毛蜕皮期间,3个物种之间没有同位素生态位重叠。与蛏或海雀位于同一区域的海雀个体的δ15N值较低,表明其营养位置较低。这3种杓鹬在其年周期的一个研究不足的阶段的重叠极少,这表明它们在空间上相互隔离并分割资源,这意味着对这3种杓鹬应分别采用不同的空间规划和生态系统保护策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Marine Ecology Progress Series
Marine Ecology Progress Series 环境科学-海洋学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
8.00%
发文量
238
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The leading journal in its field, MEPS covers all aspects of marine ecology, fundamental and applied. Topics covered include microbiology, botany, zoology, ecosystem research, biological oceanography, ecological aspects of fisheries and aquaculture, pollution, environmental protection, conservation, and resource management.
期刊最新文献
Acartia tonsa grazing on the harmful dinoflagellate Dinophysis acuminata reduces copepod survival and increases extracellular toxin concentrations Phytoplankton community composition as a driver of annual autochthonous organic carbon dynamics in the northern coastal Baltic Sea Thermal priming of Saccharina latissima: a promising strategy to improve seaweed production and restoration in future climates Diet and size at birth affect larval rockfish condition and survival Habitat-mediated direct and indirect interactions in a marine sedimentary system from Atlantic Canada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1