Diffeomorphism Invariance and General Relativity

Max Heitmann
{"title":"Diffeomorphism Invariance and General Relativity","authors":"Max Heitmann","doi":"arxiv-2407.16702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Diffeomorphism invariance is often considered to be a hallmark of the theory\nof general relativity (GR). But closer analysis reveals that this cannot be\nwhat makes GR distinctive. The concept of diffeomorphism invariance can be\ndefined in two ways: under the first definition (diff-invariance$_1$), both GR\nand all other classical spacetime theories turn out to be diffeomorphism\ninvariant, while under the second (diff-invariance$_2$), neither do. Confusion\nabout the matter can be traced to two sources. First, GR is sometimes\nerroneously thought to embody a \"general principle of relativity,\" which\nasserts the relativity of all states of motion, and from which it would follow\nthat GR must be diff-invariant$_2$. But GR embodies no such principle, and is\neasily seen to violate diff-invariance$_2$. Second, GR is unique among\nspacetime theories in requiring a general-covariant formulation, whereas other\nclassical spacetime theories are typically formulated with respect to a\npreferred class of global coordinate systems in which their dynamical equations\nsimplify. This makes GR's diffeomorphism invariance (in the sense of\ndiff-invariance$_1$) manifest, while in other spacetime theories it lies latent\n-- at least in their familiar formulations. I trace this difference back to the\nfact that the spacetime structure is inhomogeneous within the models of GR, and\nmutable across its models. I offer a formal criterion for when a spacetime\ntheory possesses immutable spacetime structure, and using this criterion I\nprove that a theory possesses a preferred class of coordinate systems\napplicable across its models if and only if it possesses immutable spacetime\nstructure.","PeriodicalId":501190,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - General Physics","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - General Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.16702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diffeomorphism invariance is often considered to be a hallmark of the theory of general relativity (GR). But closer analysis reveals that this cannot be what makes GR distinctive. The concept of diffeomorphism invariance can be defined in two ways: under the first definition (diff-invariance$_1$), both GR and all other classical spacetime theories turn out to be diffeomorphism invariant, while under the second (diff-invariance$_2$), neither do. Confusion about the matter can be traced to two sources. First, GR is sometimes erroneously thought to embody a "general principle of relativity," which asserts the relativity of all states of motion, and from which it would follow that GR must be diff-invariant$_2$. But GR embodies no such principle, and is easily seen to violate diff-invariance$_2$. Second, GR is unique among spacetime theories in requiring a general-covariant formulation, whereas other classical spacetime theories are typically formulated with respect to a preferred class of global coordinate systems in which their dynamical equations simplify. This makes GR's diffeomorphism invariance (in the sense of diff-invariance$_1$) manifest, while in other spacetime theories it lies latent -- at least in their familiar formulations. I trace this difference back to the fact that the spacetime structure is inhomogeneous within the models of GR, and mutable across its models. I offer a formal criterion for when a spacetime theory possesses immutable spacetime structure, and using this criterion I prove that a theory possesses a preferred class of coordinate systems applicable across its models if and only if it possesses immutable spacetime structure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
衍射不变性与广义相对论
衍射不变性通常被认为是广义相对论(GR)的标志。但仔细分析就会发现,这并不是广义相对论与众不同之处。衍射不变性的概念有两种定义:根据第一种定义(衍射不变性$_1$),广义相对论和所有其他经典时空理论都是衍射不变的;而根据第二种定义(衍射不变性$_2$),广义相对论和所有其他经典时空理论都不是衍射不变的。关于这个问题的混乱可以追溯到两个方面。首先,《全球定位系统》有时被误认为体现了 "相对性一般原理",该原理断言所有运动状态都具有相对性,并由此推导出《全球定位系统》必须是差分不变的_2$。但是,GR 并没有体现这样的原则,而且很容易看出它违反了差分不变性$_2$。其次,GR 在时空理论中是独一无二的,因为它需要用广义协变来表述,而其他经典时空理论通常是根据一类首选的全局坐标系来表述的,在这类坐标系中,它们的动力学方程可以简化。这使得 GR 的差分不变性(在差分不变性$_1$ 的意义上)显而易见,而在其他时空理论中,它是潜在的--至少在它们熟悉的表述中是这样。我把这种差异追溯到这样一个事实,即时空结构在 GR 模型中是不均匀的,而在不同模型中是可变的。我为时空理论何时拥有不变的时空结构提供了一个形式化的标准,并利用这个标准证明,当且仅当一个理论拥有不变的时空结构时,它才拥有一类可适用于不同模型的优选坐标系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring quantum probability interpretations through artificial intelligence Can the effect of an external gravitational field be incorporated in the classical kinetic theory of gases? Optimization of Postselection in Quantum Algorithms: A Two-Way Quantum Computing Approach Causality in the maximally extended Reissner--Nordström spacetime with identifications Mass and angular momentum for the Kerr black hole in TEGR and STEGR
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1