No-tillage with straw retention influenced maize root growth morphology by changing soil physical properties and aggregate structure in Northeast China: A ten-year field experiment

IF 3.1 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE Geoderma Regional Pub Date : 2024-07-24 DOI:10.1016/j.geodrs.2024.e00840
Yang Wang , Laidi Zou , Chenchen Lou , Xuedong Geng , Shixiu Zhang , Xuewen Chen , Yan Zhang , Dandan Huang , Aizhen Liang
{"title":"No-tillage with straw retention influenced maize root growth morphology by changing soil physical properties and aggregate structure in Northeast China: A ten-year field experiment","authors":"Yang Wang ,&nbsp;Laidi Zou ,&nbsp;Chenchen Lou ,&nbsp;Xuedong Geng ,&nbsp;Shixiu Zhang ,&nbsp;Xuewen Chen ,&nbsp;Yan Zhang ,&nbsp;Dandan Huang ,&nbsp;Aizhen Liang","doi":"10.1016/j.geodrs.2024.e00840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Conservation tillage, particularly the implementation of no-tillage and straw retention (NTS), has been proposed as an effective practice to enhance soil structure and improve soil quality in Northeast China. However, the impact of NTS on maize (<em>Zea mays</em> L.) root growth morphology and the influence of tillage practices on maize root morphology through soil physical properties and structure in Northeast China remain understudied. To address this knowledge gap, a continuous ten-year experiment was conducted to assess the effects of NTS on soil physical properties, aggregate structure, maize root morphology, and their interconnections. Our findings demonstrate that the NTS treatment significantly increased soil water content and soil bulk density at depths of 0–5 cm (1.6%) and 5–10 cm (2.2%), while decreasing soil porosity at depths of 0–5 cm (1.4%) and 5–10 cm (2.0%) compared to conventional tillage (CT). Additionally, NTS resulted in a higher content of soil macro-aggregates (&gt; 0.25 mm) and improved soil aggregate stability compared to CT. Notably, root length, root surface area, root volume, and root biomass in the NTS treatment were 6.04%, 22.15%, 10.04%, and 9.29% higher than those in CT, respectively. However, there was no significant difference in root diameter between the two tillage practices. These results reveal that NTS induces alterations in soil physical properties, aggregate size distribution and aggregate stability, thereby affecting maize root growth morphology.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56001,"journal":{"name":"Geoderma Regional","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article e00840"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoderma Regional","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352009424000877","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conservation tillage, particularly the implementation of no-tillage and straw retention (NTS), has been proposed as an effective practice to enhance soil structure and improve soil quality in Northeast China. However, the impact of NTS on maize (Zea mays L.) root growth morphology and the influence of tillage practices on maize root morphology through soil physical properties and structure in Northeast China remain understudied. To address this knowledge gap, a continuous ten-year experiment was conducted to assess the effects of NTS on soil physical properties, aggregate structure, maize root morphology, and their interconnections. Our findings demonstrate that the NTS treatment significantly increased soil water content and soil bulk density at depths of 0–5 cm (1.6%) and 5–10 cm (2.2%), while decreasing soil porosity at depths of 0–5 cm (1.4%) and 5–10 cm (2.0%) compared to conventional tillage (CT). Additionally, NTS resulted in a higher content of soil macro-aggregates (> 0.25 mm) and improved soil aggregate stability compared to CT. Notably, root length, root surface area, root volume, and root biomass in the NTS treatment were 6.04%, 22.15%, 10.04%, and 9.29% higher than those in CT, respectively. However, there was no significant difference in root diameter between the two tillage practices. These results reveal that NTS induces alterations in soil physical properties, aggregate size distribution and aggregate stability, thereby affecting maize root growth morphology.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
秸秆留茬免耕通过改变东北地区土壤物理性状和团粒结构影响玉米根系生长形态:为期十年的田间试验
保护性耕作,尤其是免耕和秸秆还田(NTS)的实施,被认为是增强东北地区土壤结构和改善土壤质量的有效方法。然而,在中国东北地区,免耕对玉米根系生长形态的影响以及耕作方法通过土壤物理特性和结构对玉米根系形态的影响仍未得到充分研究。为了填补这一知识空白,我们进行了一项连续十年的试验,以评估 NTS 对土壤物理特性、团粒结构、玉米根系形态及其相互联系的影响。我们的研究结果表明,与传统耕作(CT)相比,NTS 处理显著提高了 0-5 厘米(1.6%)和 5-10 厘米(2.2%)深度的土壤含水量和土壤容重,同时降低了 0-5 厘米(1.4%)和 5-10 厘米(2.0%)深度的土壤孔隙度。此外,与传统耕作相比,NTS 还能提高土壤宏观集聚物的含量(> 0.25 毫米),并改善土壤集聚物的稳定性。值得注意的是,NTS 处理的根长、根表面积、根体积和根生物量分别比 CT 处理高出 6.04%、22.15%、10.04% 和 9.29%。但是,两种耕作方式的根直径没有明显差异。这些结果表明,NTS 会引起土壤物理特性、团聚体大小分布和团聚体稳定性的改变,从而影响玉米根系的生长形态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geoderma Regional
Geoderma Regional Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Soil Science
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
7.30%
发文量
122
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Global issues require studies and solutions on national and regional levels. Geoderma Regional focuses on studies that increase understanding and advance our scientific knowledge of soils in all regions of the world. The journal embraces every aspect of soil science and welcomes reviews of regional progress.
期刊最新文献
Soil organic carbon to clay ratio in different pedoclimatic and agronomic conditions in northeastern North America The amendment value of pulp and paper mill sludges in Finnish coarse-textured soil Exploring the physical properties of Australian alpine soils to inform ecosystem restoration Wind erosion escalation in western Slovakia driven by climate and land use and land cover shifts Content and quality of soil organic matter in topsoils under different tundra vegetation in central Spitsbergen (High Arctic)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1