John Colwell, Peter Halley, Russell Varley, Pejman Heidarian, Tony McNally, Ton Peijs, Luigi Vandi
{"title":"Self-reinforced biodegradable thermoplastic composites","authors":"John Colwell, Peter Halley, Russell Varley, Pejman Heidarian, Tony McNally, Ton Peijs, Luigi Vandi","doi":"10.1007/s42114-024-00939-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Improvements in the mechanical performance of biodegradable plastics are required to facilitate replacement of commodity plastics as part of a global push for the use of more sustainable materials. Reinforcing biodegradable plastics with fillers or fibres to create composite materials is an obvious choice for increasing mechanical properties but may affect recyclability and biodegradability. To avoid these issues, self-reinforced polymer composites (SRPCs), where the polymer matrix is reinforced with highly oriented films, fibres, or particles of the same polymer may be used. However, the use of biodegradable thermoplastics in SRPCs is currently limited to a few polymers, mostly focusing on poly(lactic acid) (PLA). Here, we have assessed the potential for a broader range of biodegradable thermoplastics to replace commercially available commodity-plastic-based SRPCs. This assessment was done using literature data for the oriented and isotropic bulk mechanical properties of commercially relevant biodegradable thermoplastics, along with properties for their SRPCs where available. It was found that despite polycaprolactone (PCL), poly(butylene succinate) (PBS), poly(butylene succinate adipate) (PBSA), and poly(butylene adipate terephthalate) (PBAT) not being suitable replacements for current commercially available SRPCs, they nonetheless exhibit increased modulus and strength after orientation. PLA, polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs), and poly(glycolic acid) (PGA) have more potential, with PGA being the most promising, although PLA and PHAs appear to offer potentially more sustainable alternatives to commercially available SRPCs and a wider range of end-of-life disposal options.</p>","PeriodicalId":7220,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Composites and Hybrid Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":23.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Composites and Hybrid Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-024-00939-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Improvements in the mechanical performance of biodegradable plastics are required to facilitate replacement of commodity plastics as part of a global push for the use of more sustainable materials. Reinforcing biodegradable plastics with fillers or fibres to create composite materials is an obvious choice for increasing mechanical properties but may affect recyclability and biodegradability. To avoid these issues, self-reinforced polymer composites (SRPCs), where the polymer matrix is reinforced with highly oriented films, fibres, or particles of the same polymer may be used. However, the use of biodegradable thermoplastics in SRPCs is currently limited to a few polymers, mostly focusing on poly(lactic acid) (PLA). Here, we have assessed the potential for a broader range of biodegradable thermoplastics to replace commercially available commodity-plastic-based SRPCs. This assessment was done using literature data for the oriented and isotropic bulk mechanical properties of commercially relevant biodegradable thermoplastics, along with properties for their SRPCs where available. It was found that despite polycaprolactone (PCL), poly(butylene succinate) (PBS), poly(butylene succinate adipate) (PBSA), and poly(butylene adipate terephthalate) (PBAT) not being suitable replacements for current commercially available SRPCs, they nonetheless exhibit increased modulus and strength after orientation. PLA, polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs), and poly(glycolic acid) (PGA) have more potential, with PGA being the most promising, although PLA and PHAs appear to offer potentially more sustainable alternatives to commercially available SRPCs and a wider range of end-of-life disposal options.
期刊介绍:
Advanced Composites and Hybrid Materials is a leading international journal that promotes interdisciplinary collaboration among materials scientists, engineers, chemists, biologists, and physicists working on composites, including nanocomposites. Our aim is to facilitate rapid scientific communication in this field.
The journal publishes high-quality research on various aspects of composite materials, including materials design, surface and interface science/engineering, manufacturing, structure control, property design, device fabrication, and other applications. We also welcome simulation and modeling studies that are relevant to composites. Additionally, papers focusing on the relationship between fillers and the matrix are of particular interest.
Our scope includes polymer, metal, and ceramic matrices, with a special emphasis on reviews and meta-analyses related to materials selection. We cover a wide range of topics, including transport properties, strategies for controlling interfaces and composition distribution, bottom-up assembly of nanocomposites, highly porous and high-density composites, electronic structure design, materials synergisms, and thermoelectric materials.
Advanced Composites and Hybrid Materials follows a rigorous single-blind peer-review process to ensure the quality and integrity of the published work.