Non-target effects of pesticide and microbial seed treatments in maize and barley on the resident soil microbiota under conservation agriculture

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 ECOLOGY European Journal of Soil Biology Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1016/j.ejsobi.2024.103653
Pablo F. Jaramillo-López , Jaen Blas Romero , Marcela Sarabia , Simon Fonteyne , Abel Saldivia-Tejeda , Nele Verhulst , Mette Vestergård , John Larsen
{"title":"Non-target effects of pesticide and microbial seed treatments in maize and barley on the resident soil microbiota under conservation agriculture","authors":"Pablo F. Jaramillo-López ,&nbsp;Jaen Blas Romero ,&nbsp;Marcela Sarabia ,&nbsp;Simon Fonteyne ,&nbsp;Abel Saldivia-Tejeda ,&nbsp;Nele Verhulst ,&nbsp;Mette Vestergård ,&nbsp;John Larsen","doi":"10.1016/j.ejsobi.2024.103653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In production of cereals like maize (<em>Zea mays</em> L.) and barley (<em>Hordeum vulgare</em> L.), seeds are often treated with pesticides and/or commercial products of plant beneficial microorganisms (PBM) to reduce possible root damage from insect pests and soil borne root diseases. In a field experiment with maize and barley under conservation agriculture, we examined how such seed treatments affected the resident root and soil microbiota. The seed treatments included a pesticide mixture and different commercial products of common PBM based on the biocontrol agents (BCA) <em>Trichoderma harzianum</em> and <em>Metarhizium anisopliae</em> alone and in combination and a mix of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), which were compared to a negative control without seed treatment. Soil and root samples were taken at two and three sampling times during the crop cycles for barley and maize, respectively, to measure root biomass, root colonization with mycorrhizal fungi and pathogens, soil microbial communities at a general taxonomic level using biomarker fatty acids, and ecological guilds of soil nematodes. Root health was monitored with observations of the presence of insect feeding larvae and root disease symptoms, which in general showed healthy roots during the full crop cycle. Overall, most of the root and soil biota variables measured changed during the crop cycle. However, for both crops, the seed treatments had no effects on the soil and root microbiota measured, except in the case of barley root infection with <em>Polymyxa</em> sp., which was reduced by all treatments. In conclusion, the pesticide and PBM seed treatments evaluated in the present study for maize and barley under conservation agriculture, in general, had limited effects on the resident root and soil microbiota. However, future studies should include complementary high-resolution sequencing methods when examining non-target effects of pesticides and microbial inoculants on the root and soil microbiota.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12057,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Biology","volume":"122 ","pages":"Article 103653"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Soil Biology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1164556324000591","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In production of cereals like maize (Zea mays L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), seeds are often treated with pesticides and/or commercial products of plant beneficial microorganisms (PBM) to reduce possible root damage from insect pests and soil borne root diseases. In a field experiment with maize and barley under conservation agriculture, we examined how such seed treatments affected the resident root and soil microbiota. The seed treatments included a pesticide mixture and different commercial products of common PBM based on the biocontrol agents (BCA) Trichoderma harzianum and Metarhizium anisopliae alone and in combination and a mix of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), which were compared to a negative control without seed treatment. Soil and root samples were taken at two and three sampling times during the crop cycles for barley and maize, respectively, to measure root biomass, root colonization with mycorrhizal fungi and pathogens, soil microbial communities at a general taxonomic level using biomarker fatty acids, and ecological guilds of soil nematodes. Root health was monitored with observations of the presence of insect feeding larvae and root disease symptoms, which in general showed healthy roots during the full crop cycle. Overall, most of the root and soil biota variables measured changed during the crop cycle. However, for both crops, the seed treatments had no effects on the soil and root microbiota measured, except in the case of barley root infection with Polymyxa sp., which was reduced by all treatments. In conclusion, the pesticide and PBM seed treatments evaluated in the present study for maize and barley under conservation agriculture, in general, had limited effects on the resident root and soil microbiota. However, future studies should include complementary high-resolution sequencing methods when examining non-target effects of pesticides and microbial inoculants on the root and soil microbiota.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
保护性耕作下玉米和大麦的杀虫剂和微生物种子处理对常驻土壤微生物群的非目标效应
在玉米和大麦等谷物的生产过程中,种子通常要经过杀虫剂和/或植物有益微生物(PBM)商业产品的处理,以减少虫害和土壤中根部病害可能对根部造成的损害。在保护性农业条件下进行的玉米和大麦田间试验中,我们研究了此类种子处理对根系和土壤微生物群的影响。种子处理包括杀虫剂混合物、基于生物控制剂(BCA)的普通 PBM 的不同商业产品、单独或组合以及植物生长促进根瘤菌(PGPR)混合物。在大麦和玉米的作物周期内,分别在两次和三次取样时间采集土壤和根部样本,以测量根部生物量、根部菌根真菌和病原体定植情况、使用生物标记脂肪酸进行总体分类的土壤微生物群落以及土壤线虫生态区系。通过观察是否有昆虫幼虫啃食和根部疾病症状,对根部健康进行了监测。总体而言,在作物生长周期内,所测量的大多数根系和土壤生物区系变量都发生了变化。不过,对于这两种作物,种子处理对所测得的土壤和根部微生物群没有影响,但大麦根部感染孢子虫的情况除外,所有处理都能减少这种感染。总之,本研究针对保护性耕作下的玉米和大麦评估了杀虫剂和 PBM 种子处理方法,总体上对根系和土壤微生物群的影响有限。不过,在研究农药和微生物接种剂对根系和土壤微生物群的非目标影响时,未来的研究应包括补充性高分辨率测序方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Soil Biology
European Journal of Soil Biology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Soil Biology covers all aspects of soil biology which deal with microbial and faunal ecology and activity in soils, as well as natural ecosystems or biomes connected to ecological interests: biodiversity, biological conservation, adaptation, impact of global changes on soil biodiversity and ecosystem functioning and effects and fate of pollutants as influenced by soil organisms. Different levels in ecosystem structure are taken into account: individuals, populations, communities and ecosystems themselves. At each level, different disciplinary approaches are welcomed: molecular biology, genetics, ecophysiology, ecology, biogeography and landscape ecology.
期刊最新文献
In-depth insights into carbohydrate-active enzyme genes regarding the disparities in soil organic carbon after 12-year rotational cropping system field study Nutrient supply enhances positive priming of soil organic C under straw amendment and accelerates the incorporation of straw-derived C into organic C pool in paddy soils Dynamics of nitrogen mineralization and nitrogen cycling functional genes in response to soil pore size distribution Soil microbial resistance and resilience to drought under organic and conventional farming Plantation conversion of Eucalyptus promotes soil microbial necromass C accumulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1