Toward adaptive support of pre-service teachers' assessment competencies: Log data in a digital simulation reveal engagement modes

IF 4.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Learning and Instruction Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101979
Christian Schons , Andreas Obersteiner , Frank Fischer , Kristina Reiss
{"title":"Toward adaptive support of pre-service teachers' assessment competencies: Log data in a digital simulation reveal engagement modes","authors":"Christian Schons ,&nbsp;Andreas Obersteiner ,&nbsp;Frank Fischer ,&nbsp;Kristina Reiss","doi":"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Teachers need assessment competencies. That is, they need to assess students' learning outcomes accurately. Intervention studies that aimed at fostering (pre-service) teachers' assessment competencies during the assessment process show only limited effects on assessment accuracy. Adapting support measures to individual assessment processes has the potential to increase the effects. However, developing adaptive support requires a concise understanding of how assessment processes are related to individual learners’ dispositions (e.g., knowledge, interest) on the one hand and the accuracy of their assessments on the other.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>We aimed to characterize the relationships between pre-service teachers’ dispositions, assessment process, and assessment accuracy to establish a basis for adaptive support during the assessment process.</p></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><p>We analysed 65 mathematics pre-service teachers’ assessment processes in a digital simulation of a task-based assessment situation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Pre-service teachers' assessment processes were measured by recording their log data in a digital simulation. Patterns of process indicators were interpreted as modes of cognitive engagement. Process indicators included participants' selections of mathematical tasks and their interpretations of simulated students’ task solutions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We found pronounced individual differences in pre-service teachers' assessment processes, reflecting a passive, active, or constructive mode of engagement. Engagement modes were related to participants’ individual interest in student assessment. Moreover, engagement modes predicted differences in assessment accuracy above and beyond cognitive dispositions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Log data from a digital simulation help unravel the link between teachers' dispositions and accuracy in assessment situations. The results provide a basis for developing adaptive support for pre-service mathematics teachers’ assessment competencies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48357,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Instruction","volume":"94 ","pages":"Article 101979"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224001063/pdfft?md5=f6a495fa0ff449dbfc7f2e8585ba2dc4&pid=1-s2.0-S0959475224001063-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224001063","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Teachers need assessment competencies. That is, they need to assess students' learning outcomes accurately. Intervention studies that aimed at fostering (pre-service) teachers' assessment competencies during the assessment process show only limited effects on assessment accuracy. Adapting support measures to individual assessment processes has the potential to increase the effects. However, developing adaptive support requires a concise understanding of how assessment processes are related to individual learners’ dispositions (e.g., knowledge, interest) on the one hand and the accuracy of their assessments on the other.

Aims

We aimed to characterize the relationships between pre-service teachers’ dispositions, assessment process, and assessment accuracy to establish a basis for adaptive support during the assessment process.

Sample

We analysed 65 mathematics pre-service teachers’ assessment processes in a digital simulation of a task-based assessment situation.

Methods

Pre-service teachers' assessment processes were measured by recording their log data in a digital simulation. Patterns of process indicators were interpreted as modes of cognitive engagement. Process indicators included participants' selections of mathematical tasks and their interpretations of simulated students’ task solutions.

Results

We found pronounced individual differences in pre-service teachers' assessment processes, reflecting a passive, active, or constructive mode of engagement. Engagement modes were related to participants’ individual interest in student assessment. Moreover, engagement modes predicted differences in assessment accuracy above and beyond cognitive dispositions.

Conclusions

Log data from a digital simulation help unravel the link between teachers' dispositions and accuracy in assessment situations. The results provide a basis for developing adaptive support for pre-service mathematics teachers’ assessment competencies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实现对职前教师评估能力的适应性支持:数字模拟中的日志数据揭示参与模式
教师需要具备评估能力。也就是说,他们需要准确地评估学生的学习成果。旨在培养(职前)教师在评估过程中的评估能力的干预研究表明,对评估准确性的影响有限。根据个人的评估过程调整辅助措施有可能提高效果。然而,要开发适应性支持措施,就必须清楚地了解评估过程与学习者个人倾向(如知识、兴趣)及其评估准确性之间的关系。我们旨在分析职前教师的倾向、评估过程和评估准确性之间的关系,为评估过程中的适应性支持奠定基础。我们分析了 65 名数学职前教师在数字模拟任务型评估情境中的评估过程。职前教师的评估过程是通过记录他们在数字模拟中的日志数据来测量的。过程指标的模式被解释为认知参与的模式。过程指标包括参与者对数学任务的选择以及他们对模拟学生任务解决方案的解释。我们发现,职前教师的评估过程存在明显的个体差异,反映了被动、主动或建设性的参与模式。参与模式与参与者对学生评价的个人兴趣有关。此外,在认知倾向之外,参与模式还能预测评估准确性的差异。来自数字模拟的日志数据有助于揭示教师在评估情境中的处置与准确性之间的联系。这些结果为开发针对职前数学教师评估能力的适应性支持提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: As an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-refereed journal, Learning and Instruction provides a platform for the publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of learning, development, instruction and teaching. The journal welcomes original empirical investigations. The papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. They may refer to any age level, from infants to adults and to a diversity of learning and instructional settings, from laboratory experiments to field studies. The major criteria in the review and the selection process concern the significance of the contribution to the area of learning and instruction, and the rigor of the study.
期刊最新文献
Competitive and non-competitive school climate and students’ well-being Comparison effects on self- and external ratings: Testing the generalizability of the 2I/E model to parents and teachers of academic track school students Testing the CONIC model: The interplay of conscientiousness and interest in predicting academic effort Metacognitive scaffolding for digital reading and mind-wandering in adults with and without ADHD Retrieval supports word learning in children with Down syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1