Community collaboration to advance racial/ethnic equity in colorectal Cancer screening: Protocol for a multilevel intervention to improve screening and follow-up in community Health centers
Folasade P. May , Suzanne Brodney , Jessica J. Tuan , Sapna Syngal , Andrew T. Chan , Beth Glenn , Gina Johnson , Yuchiao Chang , David A. Drew , Beverly Moy , Nicolette J. Rodriguez , Erica T. Warner , Adjoa Anyane-Yeboa , Chinedu Ukaegbu , Anjelica Q. Davis , Kimberly Schoolcraft , Susan Regan , Nathan Yoguez , Samantha Kuney , Kelley Le Beaux , Jennifer S. Haas
{"title":"Community collaboration to advance racial/ethnic equity in colorectal Cancer screening: Protocol for a multilevel intervention to improve screening and follow-up in community Health centers","authors":"Folasade P. May , Suzanne Brodney , Jessica J. Tuan , Sapna Syngal , Andrew T. Chan , Beth Glenn , Gina Johnson , Yuchiao Chang , David A. Drew , Beverly Moy , Nicolette J. Rodriguez , Erica T. Warner , Adjoa Anyane-Yeboa , Chinedu Ukaegbu , Anjelica Q. Davis , Kimberly Schoolcraft , Susan Regan , Nathan Yoguez , Samantha Kuney , Kelley Le Beaux , Jennifer S. Haas","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening utilization is low among low-income, uninsured, and minority populations that receive care in community health centers (CHCs). There is a need for evidence-based interventions to increase screening and follow-up care in these settings.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A multilevel, multi-component pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial is being conducted at 8 CHCs in two metropolitan areas (Boston and Los Angeles), with two arms: (1) Mailed FIT outreach with text reminders, and (2) Mailed FIT-DNA with patient support. We also include an additional CHC in Rapid City (South Dakota) that follows a parallel protocol for FIT-DNA but is not randomized due to lack of a comparison group. Eligible individuals in participating clinics are primary care patients ages 45–75, at average-risk for CRC, and overdue for CRC screening. Participants with abnormal screening results are offered navigation for follow-up colonoscopy and CRC risk assessment.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The primary outcome is the completion rate of CRC screening at 90 days. Secondary outcomes include the screening completion rate at 180 days and the rate of colonoscopy completion within 6 months among participants with an abnormal result. Additional goals are to enhance our understanding of facilitators and barriers to CRC risk assessment in CHC settings.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study assesses the effectiveness of two multilevel interventions to increase screening participation and follow-up after abnormal screening in under-resourced clinical settings, informing future efforts to address CRC disparities.</p></div><div><h3>Trial Registration</h3><p><span><span>NCT05714644</span><svg><path></path></svg></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"145 ","pages":"Article 107639"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714424002222/pdfft?md5=36193f3e877a491f1af242e53e7b3adc&pid=1-s2.0-S1551714424002222-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714424002222","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening utilization is low among low-income, uninsured, and minority populations that receive care in community health centers (CHCs). There is a need for evidence-based interventions to increase screening and follow-up care in these settings.
Methods
A multilevel, multi-component pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial is being conducted at 8 CHCs in two metropolitan areas (Boston and Los Angeles), with two arms: (1) Mailed FIT outreach with text reminders, and (2) Mailed FIT-DNA with patient support. We also include an additional CHC in Rapid City (South Dakota) that follows a parallel protocol for FIT-DNA but is not randomized due to lack of a comparison group. Eligible individuals in participating clinics are primary care patients ages 45–75, at average-risk for CRC, and overdue for CRC screening. Participants with abnormal screening results are offered navigation for follow-up colonoscopy and CRC risk assessment.
Results
The primary outcome is the completion rate of CRC screening at 90 days. Secondary outcomes include the screening completion rate at 180 days and the rate of colonoscopy completion within 6 months among participants with an abnormal result. Additional goals are to enhance our understanding of facilitators and barriers to CRC risk assessment in CHC settings.
Conclusions
This study assesses the effectiveness of two multilevel interventions to increase screening participation and follow-up after abnormal screening in under-resourced clinical settings, informing future efforts to address CRC disparities.
期刊介绍:
Contemporary Clinical Trials is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes manuscripts pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from disciplines including medicine, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioural science, pharmaceutical science, and bioethics. Full-length papers and short communications not exceeding 1,500 words, as well as systemic reviews of clinical trials and methodologies will be published. Perspectives/commentaries on current issues and the impact of clinical trials on the practice of medicine and health policy are also welcome.