Efficacy and Safety of Pioglitazone Add-on in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled with Metformin and Dapagliflozin: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, and Placebo-controlled Study

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Clinical therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.06.023
Yun Kyung Cho MD, PhD , Kyung-Soo Kim MD, PhD , Byung-Wan Lee MD, PhD , Jun Hwa Hong MD, PhD , Jae Myung Yu MD, PhD , Soo Lim MD, PhD , Ye An Kim MD, PhD , Chang Beom Lee MD, PhD , Sang Soo Kim MD, PhD , Soo Heon Kwak MD, PhD , Woo Je Lee MD, PhD
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Pioglitazone Add-on in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled with Metformin and Dapagliflozin: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, and Placebo-controlled Study","authors":"Yun Kyung Cho MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Kyung-Soo Kim MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Byung-Wan Lee MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jun Hwa Hong MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jae Myung Yu MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Soo Lim MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Ye An Kim MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Chang Beom Lee MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Sang Soo Kim MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Soo Heon Kwak MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Woo Je Lee MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.06.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety profile of pioglitazone compared with placebo (PBO) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) inadequately controlled with metformin and dapagliflozin.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, PBO-controlled trial, 366 patients with T2D who did not meet glycemic targets (7.0% ≤ glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA<sub>1c</sub>] ≤ 10.5%), despite treatment with metformin ≥1000 mg and dapagliflozin 10 mg, received either a PBO, 15 mg of pioglitazone daily (PIO15), or 30 mg of pioglitazone daily (PIO30). The primary end point was the mean change in HbA<sub>1c</sub> from baseline at 24 weeks across the groups.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>For the 366 participants (PBO, n = 124; PIO15, n = 118; PIO30, n = 124), the mean age was 55.6 years and mean duration of diabetes was 8.7 years, with a baseline HbA<sub>1c</sub> of 7.9%. After 24 weeks, HbA<sub>1c</sub> reduced significantly in the PIO15 and PIO30 groups from baseline, with intergroup differences of −0.38% and −0.83%, respectively, compared with the PBO group. The proportion of patients with HbA<sub>1c</sub> levels &lt;7% was significantly higher in the PIO15 and PIO30 groups than in the PBO group. The adverse event rates did not significantly differ across the groups, indicating favorable safety profiles for triple combination therapy using metformin, dapagliflozin, and pioglitazone.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>The addition of pioglitazone as a third oral antidiabetic medication is an appropriate option for patients with T2D inadequately controlled with metformin and dapagliflozin based on the resulting significant efficacy in glycemic control and favorable safety profile. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04885712.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10699,"journal":{"name":"Clinical therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014929182400198X/pdfft?md5=2c1571fd29a2772f3a3996351852b070&pid=1-s2.0-S014929182400198X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014929182400198X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety profile of pioglitazone compared with placebo (PBO) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) inadequately controlled with metformin and dapagliflozin.

Methods

In this prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, PBO-controlled trial, 366 patients with T2D who did not meet glycemic targets (7.0% ≤ glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA1c] ≤ 10.5%), despite treatment with metformin ≥1000 mg and dapagliflozin 10 mg, received either a PBO, 15 mg of pioglitazone daily (PIO15), or 30 mg of pioglitazone daily (PIO30). The primary end point was the mean change in HbA1c from baseline at 24 weeks across the groups.

Findings

For the 366 participants (PBO, n = 124; PIO15, n = 118; PIO30, n = 124), the mean age was 55.6 years and mean duration of diabetes was 8.7 years, with a baseline HbA1c of 7.9%. After 24 weeks, HbA1c reduced significantly in the PIO15 and PIO30 groups from baseline, with intergroup differences of −0.38% and −0.83%, respectively, compared with the PBO group. The proportion of patients with HbA1c levels <7% was significantly higher in the PIO15 and PIO30 groups than in the PBO group. The adverse event rates did not significantly differ across the groups, indicating favorable safety profiles for triple combination therapy using metformin, dapagliflozin, and pioglitazone.

Implications

The addition of pioglitazone as a third oral antidiabetic medication is an appropriate option for patients with T2D inadequately controlled with metformin and dapagliflozin based on the resulting significant efficacy in glycemic control and favorable safety profile. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04885712.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
二甲双胍和达帕格列酮控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者加用吡格列酮的疗效和安全性:一项多中心、随机、双盲和安慰剂对照研究。
目的:本研究旨在确定吡格列酮与安慰剂(PBO)相比,对二甲双胍和达帕格列净治疗效果不佳的 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者的疗效和安全性:在这项前瞻性、多中心、随机、双盲、PBO对照试验中,366名接受二甲双胍≥1000毫克和达帕格列净10毫克治疗后仍未达到血糖目标(7.0%≤糖化血红蛋白[HbA1c]≤10.5%)的2型糖尿病患者接受了PBO、每日15毫克吡格列酮(PIO15)或每日30毫克吡格列酮(PIO30)治疗。主要终点是各组 24 周时 HbA1c 与基线相比的平均变化:366名参与者(PBO,124人;PIO15,118人;PIO30,124人)的平均年龄为55.6岁,平均糖尿病病程为8.7年,基线HbA1c为7.9%。24 周后,与 PBO 组相比,PIO15 组和 PIO30 组的 HbA1c 从基线显著降低,组间差异分别为-0.38% 和-0.83%。HbA1c 水平为 Implications 的患者比例:加入吡格列酮作为第三种口服抗糖尿病药物是二甲双胍和达帕利嗪控制不佳的 T2D 患者的合适选择,因为它能显著控制血糖并具有良好的安全性:NCT04885712。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical therapeutics
Clinical therapeutics 医学-药学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
154
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Therapeutics provides peer-reviewed, rapid publication of recent developments in drug and other therapies as well as in diagnostics, pharmacoeconomics, health policy, treatment outcomes, and innovations in drug and biologics research. In addition Clinical Therapeutics features updates on specific topics collated by expert Topic Editors. Clinical Therapeutics is read by a large international audience of scientists and clinicians in a variety of research, academic, and clinical practice settings. Articles are indexed by all major biomedical abstracting databases.
期刊最新文献
The Role of Sex and Gender in Precision Emergency Medicine: A Scoping Review and Proposed Hierarchy. Sex Differences in Testing for Pulmonary Embolism Among Emergency Department Patients Aged 18-49 by Chief Complaint. The Efficacy Research of Prophylactic PEG-rhG-CSF in Preventing Neutropenia in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Docetaxel-Based Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Analysis. Correlation Between Vitamin D, Inflammatory Markers, and T Lymphocytes With the Severity of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and its Effect on the Risk of Acute Exacerbation: A Single Cross-sectional Study. Understanding Variation Among Medical Device Reporting Sources: A Study of the MAUDE Database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1