Diagnosing the Severity of Knee Osteoarthritis Using Regression Scores From Artificial Intelligence Convolution Neural Networks.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Orthopedics Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-29 DOI:10.3928/01477447-20240718-02
Michael Fei, Sarah Lu, Jun Ho Chung, Sherif Hassan, Joseph Elsissy, Brian A Schneiderman
{"title":"Diagnosing the Severity of Knee Osteoarthritis Using Regression Scores From Artificial Intelligence Convolution Neural Networks.","authors":"Michael Fei, Sarah Lu, Jun Ho Chung, Sherif Hassan, Joseph Elsissy, Brian A Schneiderman","doi":"10.3928/01477447-20240718-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study focused on using deep learning neural networks to classify the severity of osteoarthritis in the knee. A continuous regression score of osteoarthritis severity has yet to be explored using artificial intelligence machine learning, which could offer a more nuanced assessment of osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study used 8260 radiographic images from The Osteoarthritis Initiative to develop and assess four neural network models (VGG16, EfficientNetV2 small, ResNet34, and DenseNet196). Each model generated a regressor score of the osteoarthritis severity based on Kellgren-Lawrence grading scale criteria. Primary performance outcomes assessed were area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, and mean absolute error (MAE) for each model. Secondary outcomes evaluated were precision, recall, and F-1 score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The EfficientNet model architecture yielded the strongest AUC (0.83), accuracy (71%), and MAE (0.42) compared with VGG16 (AUC: 0.74; accuracy: 57%; MAE: 0.54), ResNet34 (AUC: 0.76; accuracy: 60%; MAE: 0.53), and DenseNet196 (AUC: 0.78; accuracy: 62%; MAE: 0.49).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Convolutional neural networks offer an automated and accurate way to quickly assess and diagnose knee radiographs for osteoarthritis. The regression score models evaluated in this study demonstrated superior AUC, accuracy, and MAE compared with standard convolutional neural network models. The EfficientNet model exhibited the best overall performance, including the highest AUC (0.83) noted in the literature. The artificial intelligence-generated regressor exhibits a finer progression of knee osteoarthritis by quantifying severity of various hallmark features. Potential applications for this technology include its use as a screening tool in determining patient suitability for orthopedic referral. [<i>Orthopedics</i>. 2024;47(5):e247-e254.].</p>","PeriodicalId":19631,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedics","volume":" ","pages":"e247-e254"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20240718-02","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study focused on using deep learning neural networks to classify the severity of osteoarthritis in the knee. A continuous regression score of osteoarthritis severity has yet to be explored using artificial intelligence machine learning, which could offer a more nuanced assessment of osteoarthritis.

Materials and methods: This study used 8260 radiographic images from The Osteoarthritis Initiative to develop and assess four neural network models (VGG16, EfficientNetV2 small, ResNet34, and DenseNet196). Each model generated a regressor score of the osteoarthritis severity based on Kellgren-Lawrence grading scale criteria. Primary performance outcomes assessed were area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, and mean absolute error (MAE) for each model. Secondary outcomes evaluated were precision, recall, and F-1 score.

Results: The EfficientNet model architecture yielded the strongest AUC (0.83), accuracy (71%), and MAE (0.42) compared with VGG16 (AUC: 0.74; accuracy: 57%; MAE: 0.54), ResNet34 (AUC: 0.76; accuracy: 60%; MAE: 0.53), and DenseNet196 (AUC: 0.78; accuracy: 62%; MAE: 0.49).

Conclusion: Convolutional neural networks offer an automated and accurate way to quickly assess and diagnose knee radiographs for osteoarthritis. The regression score models evaluated in this study demonstrated superior AUC, accuracy, and MAE compared with standard convolutional neural network models. The EfficientNet model exhibited the best overall performance, including the highest AUC (0.83) noted in the literature. The artificial intelligence-generated regressor exhibits a finer progression of knee osteoarthritis by quantifying severity of various hallmark features. Potential applications for this technology include its use as a screening tool in determining patient suitability for orthopedic referral. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(5):e247-e254.].

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用人工智能卷积神经网络的回归评分诊断膝骨关节炎的严重程度
研究背景本研究的重点是利用深度学习神经网络对膝关节骨关节炎的严重程度进行分类。骨关节炎严重程度的连续回归评分还有待利用人工智能机器学习进行探索,它可以对骨关节炎进行更细致的评估:本研究使用骨关节炎倡议组织的 8260 张放射影像来开发和评估四种神经网络模型(VGG16、EfficientNetV2 small、ResNet34 和 DenseNet196)。每个模型都根据 Kellgren-Lawrence 分级标准生成骨关节炎严重程度的回归分数。评估的主要性能结果是每个模型的曲线下面积(AUC)、准确度和平均绝对误差(MAE)。次要评估结果为精确度、召回率和 F-1 分数:结果:与 VGG16(AUC:0.74;准确率:57%;平均绝对误差:0.54)、ResNet34(AUC:0.76;准确率:60%;平均绝对误差:0.53)和 DenseNet196(AUC:0.78;准确率:62%;平均绝对误差:0.49)相比,EfficientNet 模型架构的 AUC(0.83)、准确率(71%)和平均绝对误差(0.42)最强:卷积神经网络为快速评估和诊断膝关节骨关节炎提供了一种自动化的准确方法。与标准卷积神经网络模型相比,本研究中评估的回归评分模型在AUC、准确性和MAE方面都表现出更高的水平。EfficientNet 模型表现出最佳的整体性能,包括文献中提到的最高 AUC(0.83)。人工智能生成的回归器通过量化各种标志性特征的严重程度,显示出膝关节骨性关节炎更精细的进展。这项技术的潜在应用包括将其用作筛选工具,以确定患者是否适合骨科转诊。[骨科。202x;4x(x):xx-xx]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopedics
Orthopedics 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: For over 40 years, Orthopedics, a bimonthly peer-reviewed journal, has been the preferred choice of orthopedic surgeons for clinically relevant information on all aspects of adult and pediatric orthopedic surgery and treatment. Edited by Robert D''Ambrosia, MD, Chairman of the Department of Orthopedics at the University of Colorado, Denver, and former President of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, as well as an Editorial Board of over 100 international orthopedists, Orthopedics is the source to turn to for guidance in your practice. The journal offers access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content. Highlights also include Blue Ribbon articles published full text in print and online, as well as Tips & Techniques posted with every issue.
期刊最新文献
An Analysis of the Complication Reports of Expandable Lumbar Interbody Cages in the Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database. An Eponymous History of Hemostatic, Tissue, and Reduction Clamps in Orthopedic Surgery. Evaluating the References of Insurance Policies for Computer-Assisted Navigation in Total Knee Arthroplasty Compared With the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guideline. The Relationship Between Surgeon Volume and Major Surgical Complications After Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: An Evaluation of 3177 US Orthopedic Surgeons. Trends in Location of Death for Individuals With Primary Bone Tumors in the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1