Impact of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy on gastric cancer survival: Peritoneal metastasis and cytology perspectives.

IF 2.6 Q3 ONCOLOGY World journal of clinical oncology Pub Date : 2024-07-24 DOI:10.5306/wjco.v15.i7.840
Asada Methasate, Thammawat Parakonthun, Thita Intralawan, Chawisa Nampoolsuksan, Jirawat Swangsri
{"title":"Impact of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy on gastric cancer survival: Peritoneal metastasis and cytology perspectives.","authors":"Asada Methasate, Thammawat Parakonthun, Thita Intralawan, Chawisa Nampoolsuksan, Jirawat Swangsri","doi":"10.5306/wjco.v15.i7.840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastric cancer presenting with peritoneal metastasis is notably associated with diminished survival prospects. The use of cytoreductive surgery in conjunction with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been shown to increase survival rates in these patients. Despite these advancements, debates persist regarding the magnitude of survival improvement attributed to this treatment modality. The present investigation examined survival outcomes following HIPEC in individuals diagnosed with gastric cancer and peritoneal metastasis, and it took a comparative analysis of patients exhibiting positive and negative cytological findings.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the impact of HIPEC on survival in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis and positive or negative cytology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between April 2013 and March 2020, 84 patients with advanced gastric cancer treated at our institution were categorized into three cohorts: HIPEC (20 patients with peritoneal metastasis), cytology-positive (23 patients without peritoneal nodules but with positive wash cytology), and cytology-negative (41 patients with advanced gastric cancer, no peritoneal nodules, and negative wash cytology). The HIPEC cohort underwent gastrectomy with HIPEC, while the cytology-positive and cytology-negative groups received gastrectomy alone. The demographic, pathological, and survival data of the groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The HIPEC cohort-predominantly younger females-exhibited relatively extended surgical durations and high blood loss. Nevertheless, the complication rates were consistent across all three groups. Median survival in the HIPEC group was 20.00 ± 4.89 months, with 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year overall survival rates of 73.90%, 28.70%, and 9.60%, respectively. These figures paralleled the survival rates of the cytology-positive group (52.20% at 1 year, 28.50% at 2 years, and 19.00% at 3 years). Notably, 47% of patients experienced peritoneal recurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HIPEC may offer a modest improvement in short-term survival for patients with gastric cancer and peritoneal metastasis, mirroring the outcomes in cytology-positive patients. However, peritoneal recurrence remained high.</p>","PeriodicalId":23802,"journal":{"name":"World journal of clinical oncology","volume":"15 7","pages":"840-847"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11271738/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v15.i7.840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gastric cancer presenting with peritoneal metastasis is notably associated with diminished survival prospects. The use of cytoreductive surgery in conjunction with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been shown to increase survival rates in these patients. Despite these advancements, debates persist regarding the magnitude of survival improvement attributed to this treatment modality. The present investigation examined survival outcomes following HIPEC in individuals diagnosed with gastric cancer and peritoneal metastasis, and it took a comparative analysis of patients exhibiting positive and negative cytological findings.

Aim: To compare the impact of HIPEC on survival in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis and positive or negative cytology.

Methods: Between April 2013 and March 2020, 84 patients with advanced gastric cancer treated at our institution were categorized into three cohorts: HIPEC (20 patients with peritoneal metastasis), cytology-positive (23 patients without peritoneal nodules but with positive wash cytology), and cytology-negative (41 patients with advanced gastric cancer, no peritoneal nodules, and negative wash cytology). The HIPEC cohort underwent gastrectomy with HIPEC, while the cytology-positive and cytology-negative groups received gastrectomy alone. The demographic, pathological, and survival data of the groups were compared.

Results: The HIPEC cohort-predominantly younger females-exhibited relatively extended surgical durations and high blood loss. Nevertheless, the complication rates were consistent across all three groups. Median survival in the HIPEC group was 20.00 ± 4.89 months, with 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year overall survival rates of 73.90%, 28.70%, and 9.60%, respectively. These figures paralleled the survival rates of the cytology-positive group (52.20% at 1 year, 28.50% at 2 years, and 19.00% at 3 years). Notably, 47% of patients experienced peritoneal recurrence.

Conclusion: HIPEC may offer a modest improvement in short-term survival for patients with gastric cancer and peritoneal metastasis, mirroring the outcomes in cytology-positive patients. However, peritoneal recurrence remained high.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔内热化疗对胃癌生存率的影响:从腹膜转移和细胞学角度看问题。
背景:出现腹膜转移的胃癌患者生存率明显下降。事实证明,细胞还原手术与腹腔热化疗(HIPEC)的结合使用可提高这些患者的生存率。尽管取得了这些进展,但关于这种治疗方式改善生存率的程度仍存在争议。本调查研究了被诊断为胃癌和腹膜转移的患者接受 HIPEC 后的生存结果,并对细胞学检查结果为阳性和阴性的患者进行了对比分析。目的:比较 HIPEC 对腹膜转移且细胞学检查结果为阳性或阴性的胃癌患者生存率的影响:方法:2013 年 4 月至 2020 年 3 月期间,在我院接受治疗的 84 例晚期胃癌患者被分为三组:HIPEC组(20例腹膜转移患者)、细胞学阳性组(23例无腹膜结节但洗涤细胞学阳性患者)和细胞学阴性组(41例晚期胃癌患者,无腹膜结节,洗涤细胞学阴性)。HIPEC组患者在接受胃切除术的同时接受HIPEC治疗,而细胞学阳性组和细胞学阴性组患者仅接受胃切除术。对各组的人口统计学、病理学和生存数据进行了比较:结果:HIPEC组主要为年轻女性,手术时间相对较长,失血量较高。不过,三组的并发症发生率一致。HIPEC 组的中位生存期为(20.00 ± 4.89)个月,1 年、2 年和 3 年总生存率分别为 73.90%、28.70% 和 9.60%。这些数字与细胞学阳性组的生存率(1 年 52.20%、2 年 28.50%、3 年 19.00%)相当。值得注意的是,47%的患者出现腹膜复发:结论:HIPEC可适度提高胃癌腹膜转移患者的短期生存率,这与细胞学阳性患者的结果一致。然而,腹膜复发率仍然很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
585
期刊介绍: The WJCO is a high-quality, peer reviewed, open-access journal. The primary task of WJCO is to rapidly publish high-quality original articles, reviews, editorials, and case reports in the field of oncology. In order to promote productive academic communication, the peer review process for the WJCO is transparent; to this end, all published manuscripts are accompanied by the anonymized reviewers’ comments as well as the authors’ responses. The primary aims of the WJCO are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in oncology. Scope: Art of Oncology, Biology of Neoplasia, Breast Cancer, Cancer Prevention and Control, Cancer-Related Complications, Diagnosis in Oncology, Gastrointestinal Cancer, Genetic Testing For Cancer, Gynecologic Cancer, Head and Neck Cancer, Hematologic Malignancy, Lung Cancer, Melanoma, Molecular Oncology, Neurooncology, Palliative and Supportive Care, Pediatric Oncology, Surgical Oncology, Translational Oncology, and Urologic Oncology.
期刊最新文献
DEK::AFF2 fusion-associated middle ear non-keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma: A case report. Advancements and challenges in the treatment of esophageal cancer: A comprehensive review. Chronic pancreatitis as a driving factor for pancreatic cancer: An epidemiological understanding. Orbital and sinus rhabdomyosarcoma with concurrent central retinal artery occlusion: A case report. Paclitaxel for second-line treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A multicenter retrospective Italian study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1