Digital health competencies and affecting factors among healthcare professionals: additional findings from a systematic review.

IF 1.6 Q2 NURSING Journal of Research in Nursing Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-20 DOI:10.1177/17449871241226899
Jessica Longhini, Giacomo Rossettini, Alvisa Palese
{"title":"Digital health competencies and affecting factors among healthcare professionals: additional findings from a systematic review.","authors":"Jessica Longhini, Giacomo Rossettini, Alvisa Palese","doi":"10.1177/17449871241226899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In recent decades, nurses' and healthcare professionals' digital health competencies have emerged as key factors in enabling the digital healthcare transformation. Therefore, this review aims to describe the level of digital health competencies among nurses and healthcare professionals and the factors affecting them.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed an additional analysis of a database populated in our original systematic review by identifying the data set, evaluating its appropriateness to the research questions, and performing the data analysis. Four areas of digital health competencies among nurses and healthcare professionals emerged: 'self-rated competencies', 'psychological and emotional aspects toward the use of digital technologies', 'knowledge about digital technologies' and 'use of digital technologies'. Item scores and affecting factors have been extracted and classified into poor, moderate and good levels of digital health competencies; factors have been categorised and then summarised.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>'Use of digital technologies' was the area with the highest prevalence of poor-level scores, whereas the 'knowledge about digital technologies' had a good level of competence. Across categories, most of the items' scores reflected a moderate level of competence. The main factors affecting digital health competencies in nursing were being younger, more educated, having positive collegial nurse-physician relationships and participating in hospital business.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Digital health competence might be further improved. Educators, policymakers and nurse managers should develop educational nursing programmes and opportunities by acting on the modifiable factors to develop digital health competencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":47172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Nursing","volume":"29 2","pages":"156-176"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11271674/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17449871241226899","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In recent decades, nurses' and healthcare professionals' digital health competencies have emerged as key factors in enabling the digital healthcare transformation. Therefore, this review aims to describe the level of digital health competencies among nurses and healthcare professionals and the factors affecting them.

Methods: We performed an additional analysis of a database populated in our original systematic review by identifying the data set, evaluating its appropriateness to the research questions, and performing the data analysis. Four areas of digital health competencies among nurses and healthcare professionals emerged: 'self-rated competencies', 'psychological and emotional aspects toward the use of digital technologies', 'knowledge about digital technologies' and 'use of digital technologies'. Item scores and affecting factors have been extracted and classified into poor, moderate and good levels of digital health competencies; factors have been categorised and then summarised.

Results: 'Use of digital technologies' was the area with the highest prevalence of poor-level scores, whereas the 'knowledge about digital technologies' had a good level of competence. Across categories, most of the items' scores reflected a moderate level of competence. The main factors affecting digital health competencies in nursing were being younger, more educated, having positive collegial nurse-physician relationships and participating in hospital business.

Discussion: Digital health competence might be further improved. Educators, policymakers and nurse managers should develop educational nursing programmes and opportunities by acting on the modifiable factors to develop digital health competencies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗保健专业人员的数字健康能力及影响因素:系统性审查的补充结果。
前言近几十年来,护士和医护人员的数字医疗能力已成为实现数字医疗转型的关键因素。因此,本综述旨在描述护士和医护人员的数字医疗能力水平及其影响因素:我们对原始系统综述中的数据库进行了补充分析,确定了数据集,评估了其与研究问题的适当性,并进行了数据分析。护士和医疗保健专业人员的数字健康能力包括四个方面:"自我评价能力"、"使用数字技术的心理和情感方面"、"数字技术知识 "和 "数字技术的使用"。对项目得分和影响因素进行了提取,并将数字健康能力分为差、中、好三个等级;对因素进行了分类,然后进行了总结:结果:"数字技术的使用 "是得分较低的领域,而 "数字技术知识 "的能力水平较高。在所有类别中,大多数项目的得分反映了中等水平的能力。影响护理人员数字健康能力的主要因素是年轻、受教育程度较高、拥有积极的护医同事关系以及参与医院业务:讨论:数字健康能力有待进一步提高。教育者、政策制定者和护士管理者应根据可改变的因素制定护理教育计划和机会,以培养数字健康能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: The Journal of Research in Nursing is a leading peer reviewed journal that blends good research with contemporary debates about policy and practice. The Journal of Research in Nursing contributes knowledge to nursing practice, research and local, national and international health and social care policy. Each issue contains a variety of papers and review commentaries within a specific theme. The editors are advised and supported by a board of key academics, practitioners and policy makers of international standing. The Journal of Research in Nursing will: • Ensure an evidence base to your practice and policy development • Inform your research work at an advanced level • Challenge you to critically reflect on the interface between practice, policy and research
期刊最新文献
Commentary 1: Coping styles moderate the relationships between general and minority stress and depression among sexual and gender minority populations in Thailand: a cross-sectional study. Commentary: The validity and reliability of the Indonesian version of Diabetes Mellitus Self-Efficacy Scale (DMSES-I). Coping styles moderate the relationships between general and minority stress and depression among sexual and gender minority populations in Thailand: a cross-sectional study. The assessment of reliability and validity of the Thai Versions of the Thirst Distress Scale for patients with Heart Failure and the Simplified Nutritional Appetite Questionnaire in heart failure patients. The relevance of nursing to the achievement of person-centred infection prevention and control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1