Maintaining Delivery of Evidence-Based Interventions to Reduce Under-5 Mortality During COVID-19 in Rwanda: Lessons Learned through Implementation Research.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Annals of Global Health Pub Date : 2024-07-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5334/aogh.4348
Alemayehu Amberbir, Felix Sayinzoga, Kedest Mathewos, Jovial Thomas Ntawukuriryayo, Amelia VanderZanden, Lisa R Hirschhorn, Agnes Binagwaho
{"title":"Maintaining Delivery of Evidence-Based Interventions to Reduce Under-5 Mortality During COVID-19 in Rwanda: Lessons Learned through Implementation Research.","authors":"Alemayehu Amberbir, Felix Sayinzoga, Kedest Mathewos, Jovial Thomas Ntawukuriryayo, Amelia VanderZanden, Lisa R Hirschhorn, Agnes Binagwaho","doi":"10.5334/aogh.4348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in drops in access to and availability of a number of evidence-based interventions (EBIs) known to reduce under-5 mortality (U5M) across a wide range of countries, including Rwanda. We aimed to understand the strategies and contextual factors associated with preventing or mitigating drops nationally and subnationally, and the extent to which previous efforts to reduce U5M supported the maintenance of healthcare delivery. <i>Methods:</i> We used a convergent mixed methods implementation science approach, guided by hybrid implementation research and resiliency frameworks. We triangulated data from three sources: desk review of available documents, existing routine data from the health management information system, and key informant interviews (KIIs). We analyzed quantitative data through scatter plots using interrupted time series analysis to describe changes in EBI access, uptake, and delivery. We used a Poisson regression model to estimate the impact of COVID-19 on health management information system indicators, adjusting for seasonality. We used thematic analysis of coded interviews to identify emerging patterns and themes. <i>Results:</i> We found moderate 4% (IRR = 0.96; 95%CI: 0.93, 1.00) and 5% (IRR = 0.95; 95%CI: 0.92, 0.99) drops in pentavalent and rotavirus 2 doses vaccines administered, respectively. Nationally, there was a 5% drop in facility-based delivery (IRR = 0.95; 95%CI: 0.92, 0.99). Lockdown and movement restrictions and community and health-worker fear of COVID-19 were barriers to service delivery early in the pandemic. Key implementation strategies to prevent or respond to EBI drops included leveraging community-based healthcare delivery, data use for decision-making, mentorship and supervision, and use of digital platform. <i>Conclusions:</i> While Rwanda had drops in some EBIs early in the pandemic, especially during the initial lockdown, this was rapidly identified, and response implemented. The resiliency of the health system was associated with the Rwandan health system's ability to learn and adapt, encouraging a flexible response to fit the situation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48857,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Global Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11276474/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.4348","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in drops in access to and availability of a number of evidence-based interventions (EBIs) known to reduce under-5 mortality (U5M) across a wide range of countries, including Rwanda. We aimed to understand the strategies and contextual factors associated with preventing or mitigating drops nationally and subnationally, and the extent to which previous efforts to reduce U5M supported the maintenance of healthcare delivery. Methods: We used a convergent mixed methods implementation science approach, guided by hybrid implementation research and resiliency frameworks. We triangulated data from three sources: desk review of available documents, existing routine data from the health management information system, and key informant interviews (KIIs). We analyzed quantitative data through scatter plots using interrupted time series analysis to describe changes in EBI access, uptake, and delivery. We used a Poisson regression model to estimate the impact of COVID-19 on health management information system indicators, adjusting for seasonality. We used thematic analysis of coded interviews to identify emerging patterns and themes. Results: We found moderate 4% (IRR = 0.96; 95%CI: 0.93, 1.00) and 5% (IRR = 0.95; 95%CI: 0.92, 0.99) drops in pentavalent and rotavirus 2 doses vaccines administered, respectively. Nationally, there was a 5% drop in facility-based delivery (IRR = 0.95; 95%CI: 0.92, 0.99). Lockdown and movement restrictions and community and health-worker fear of COVID-19 were barriers to service delivery early in the pandemic. Key implementation strategies to prevent or respond to EBI drops included leveraging community-based healthcare delivery, data use for decision-making, mentorship and supervision, and use of digital platform. Conclusions: While Rwanda had drops in some EBIs early in the pandemic, especially during the initial lockdown, this was rapidly identified, and response implemented. The resiliency of the health system was associated with the Rwandan health system's ability to learn and adapt, encouraging a flexible response to fit the situation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在卢旺达 COVID-19 期间继续提供循证干预措施以降低 5 岁以下儿童死亡率:通过实施研究吸取的经验教训。
背景:COVID-19 大流行导致包括卢旺达在内的许多国家在获取和提供已知可降低 5 岁以下儿童死亡率(U5M)的循证干预措施(EBIs)方面出现下降。我们的目的是了解在国家和次国家范围内防止或减轻下降的相关策略和背景因素,以及以前为降低 5 岁以下儿童死亡率所做的努力在多大程度上支持了医疗保健服务的维持。方法:在混合实施研究和复原力框架的指导下,我们采用了一种聚合混合方法实施科学方法。我们对三个来源的数据进行了三角测量:对现有文件的案头审查、卫生管理信息系统中的现有常规数据以及关键信息提供者访谈(KIIs)。我们利用间断时间序列分析法,通过散点图对定量数据进行了分析,以描述 EBI 获取、吸收和交付方面的变化。我们使用泊松回归模型来估计 COVID-19 对卫生管理信息系统指标的影响,并对季节性因素进行了调整。我们对编码访谈进行了主题分析,以确定新出现的模式和主题。结果我们发现五联疫苗和轮状病毒 2 剂疫苗接种量分别适度下降了 4% (IRR = 0.96; 95%CI: 0.93, 1.00) 和 5% (IRR = 0.95; 95%CI: 0.92, 0.99)。在全国范围内,设施接种率下降了 5%(IRR = 0.95;95%CI:0.92, 0.99)。封锁和行动限制以及社区和医疗工作者对 COVID-19 的恐惧是大流行早期提供服务的障碍。预防或应对 EBI 下降的关键实施策略包括利用社区医疗保健服务、决策数据使用、指导和监督以及数字平台的使用。结论:虽然卢旺达在大流行初期,特别是在最初的封锁期间,出现了一些 EBI 下降的情况,但这种情况被迅速识别出来,并实施了应对措施。卫生系统的复原力与卢旺达卫生系统的学习和适应能力有关,鼓励根据情况采取灵活的应对措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Global Health
Annals of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: ANNALS OF GLOBAL HEALTH is a peer-reviewed, open access journal focused on global health. The journal’s mission is to advance and disseminate knowledge of global health. Its goals are improve the health and well-being of all people, advance health equity and promote wise stewardship of the earth’s environment. The journal is published by the Boston College Global Public Health Program. It was founded in 1934 by the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai as the Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine. It is a partner journal of the Consortium of Universities for Global Health.
期刊最新文献
Is there an Association between Dietary Micronutrients Intake and Bone Fractures among Malaysian Reproductive-Age Women? The PURE Malaysia Study. Global Community Health Screening and Educational Intervention for Early Detection of Cardiometabolic Renal Disease. An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses Evaluating Associations between Human Health and Exposure to Major Classes of Plastic-Associated Chemicals. Impact of Institutionalisation of Births on Health Policies and Birth Registration in India. Malnutrition among Children under Age Five in Panama: Results of the ENSPA 2019.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1