Evaluation of the Healing Status of Lateral Ankle Ligaments 6 Weeks After an Acute Ankle Sprain

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1053/j.jfas.2024.07.004
Henrique Mansur MD, PhD , João Luiz Quagliotti Durigan PhD , Simone Contessoto MD , Daniel Augusto Maranho MD, PhD , Marcello Henrique Nogueira-Barbosa MD, PhD
{"title":"Evaluation of the Healing Status of Lateral Ankle Ligaments 6 Weeks After an Acute Ankle Sprain","authors":"Henrique Mansur MD, PhD ,&nbsp;João Luiz Quagliotti Durigan PhD ,&nbsp;Simone Contessoto MD ,&nbsp;Daniel Augusto Maranho MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Marcello Henrique Nogueira-Barbosa MD, PhD","doi":"10.1053/j.jfas.2024.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We aimed to investigate whether there is clinical and MRI evidence of healing of lateral ligaments 6 weeks after acute lateral ankle sprain (LAS). We prospectively enrolled 18 participants (age 32.7 ± 7.5 years) who sustained an acute LAS and underwent conservative treatment. An ankle MRI was acquired up to 48 hours and 6 weeks following the LAS. A partial tear of the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) was observed in 10/18 and a complete tear in 8/18 of the patients. The calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) was partially torn in 11/18 and completely torn in 1/18 of the patients. The healing status, intensity, and thickness of the ligaments, Anterior Drawer Test (ADT), and FAOS scale were assessed. A control group (CG) was composed by 17 participants (age 40 ± 13.9 years). Six weeks after the LAS, 89% of the participants presented MRI evidence of ATFL healing. The repaired ATFL was thicker in comparison with the CG (<em>p</em> &lt; .001). The cut-off of 2.5 mm for ATFL thickness in the 6th week maximized sensitivity (62.5%) and specificity (100%). CFL and PTFL presented 94% and 100% of healing signs, respectively. In the 6th week, 11/18 (61%) participants showed mild residual instability and a mean FAOS of 80 ± 11. The MRI revealed signs of the repair process in 89% of ATFL and 94% of CFL tears, 6 weeks after a moderate or severe LAS. The MRI findings were concomitant with enhancements in mechanical ankle stability and function.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","volume":"63 6","pages":"Pages 637-645"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1067251624001509","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We aimed to investigate whether there is clinical and MRI evidence of healing of lateral ligaments 6 weeks after acute lateral ankle sprain (LAS). We prospectively enrolled 18 participants (age 32.7 ± 7.5 years) who sustained an acute LAS and underwent conservative treatment. An ankle MRI was acquired up to 48 hours and 6 weeks following the LAS. A partial tear of the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) was observed in 10/18 and a complete tear in 8/18 of the patients. The calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) was partially torn in 11/18 and completely torn in 1/18 of the patients. The healing status, intensity, and thickness of the ligaments, Anterior Drawer Test (ADT), and FAOS scale were assessed. A control group (CG) was composed by 17 participants (age 40 ± 13.9 years). Six weeks after the LAS, 89% of the participants presented MRI evidence of ATFL healing. The repaired ATFL was thicker in comparison with the CG (p < .001). The cut-off of 2.5 mm for ATFL thickness in the 6th week maximized sensitivity (62.5%) and specificity (100%). CFL and PTFL presented 94% and 100% of healing signs, respectively. In the 6th week, 11/18 (61%) participants showed mild residual instability and a mean FAOS of 80 ± 11. The MRI revealed signs of the repair process in 89% of ATFL and 94% of CFL tears, 6 weeks after a moderate or severe LAS. The MRI findings were concomitant with enhancements in mechanical ankle stability and function.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估急性踝关节扭伤六周后外侧踝关节韧带的愈合状况。
我们的目的是研究急性外侧踝关节扭伤(LAS)6 周后,外侧韧带是否有愈合的临床和 MRI 证据。我们前瞻性地招募了 18 名急性外侧踝关节扭伤并接受保守治疗的患者(年龄为 32.7 ± 7.5 岁)。在 LAS 发生后 48 小时和 6 周内分别进行了踝关节核磁共振成像检查。结果显示,10/18 的患者出现了距骨胫骨前韧带(ATFL)部分撕裂,8/18 的患者出现了完全撕裂。11/18的患者小腿腓骨韧带(CFL)部分撕裂,1/18的患者完全撕裂。对韧带的愈合状态、强度和厚度、前牵引试验(ADT)和 FAOS 量表进行了评估。对照组(CG)由 17 名参与者组成(年龄为 40 ± 13.9 岁)。LAS 六周后,89% 的参与者出现了 ATFL 愈合的 MRI 证据。与对照组相比,修复后的 ATFL 更厚(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
234
审稿时长
29.8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery is the leading source for original, clinically-focused articles on the surgical and medical management of the foot and ankle. Each bi-monthly, peer-reviewed issue addresses relevant topics to the profession, such as: adult reconstruction of the forefoot; adult reconstruction of the hindfoot and ankle; diabetes; medicine/rheumatology; pediatrics; research; sports medicine; trauma; and tumors.
期刊最新文献
Modified Lapidus Procedure with a Nitinol Staple and Two Screw Construct Technique. Assessment of peroneal tendon lesions using 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional isotropic magnetic resonance imaging with surgical correlation. Comparison of Shock Wave Therapy and Low-Dye Tape Method in Patients with Plantar Fasciitis: A Randomized Controlled Study. Ankle fractures reduction under direct visualization. Superiority of anatomical landmarks versus radiological evaluation- A randomised control trial. The 100 Most Impactful Articles in Foot and Ankle Surgery: An Altmetric Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1