Effects of app-based relaxation techniques on perceived momentary relaxation: Observational data analysis in people with cancer

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Psychosomatic Research Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2024.111864
{"title":"Effects of app-based relaxation techniques on perceived momentary relaxation: Observational data analysis in people with cancer","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2024.111864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To examine the effects of six relaxation techniques on perceived momentary relaxation and a possible association of relaxation effects with time and practice experience in people with cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used data from participants with cancer in a larger study practicing app-based relaxation techniques over 10 weeks, assessed momentary relaxation before and after every third relaxation practice, and analyzed momentary relaxation changes with a linear mixed-effects model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The sample included 611 before-after observations from 91 participants (70 females (76.9%)) with a mean age of 55.43 years (SD 10.88). We found moderate evidence for variations in momentary relaxation changes across different techniques (<em>P</em> = .026), with short meditation, mindfulness meditation, guided imagery, and progressive muscle relaxation more frequently observed and leading to more relaxation than body scan and walking meditation. Furthermore, we found moderate evidence for increasing momentary relaxation changes over time (<em>P</em> = .046), but no evidence for an association between momentary relaxation and the number of previous observations (proxy for practice experience; <em>P</em> = .47).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We compared six app-based relaxation techniques in a real-life setting of people with cancer. The observed variations in perceived momentary relaxation appear to correspond with the popularity of the techniques used: The most popular relaxation techniques were the most effective and the least popular were the least effective. The effects increased over time, likely caused by dropout of individuals who gained no immediate benefit. Our findings open an interesting avenue for future research to better understand which relaxation techniques work best for whom in which situations.</p></div><div><h3>Trial Registration</h3><p>DRKS00027546; <span><span>https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00027546</span><svg><path></path></svg></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":50074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022399924002769/pdfft?md5=9a2a202a85ee3d09f0ae8651987d9e4f&pid=1-s2.0-S0022399924002769-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022399924002769","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To examine the effects of six relaxation techniques on perceived momentary relaxation and a possible association of relaxation effects with time and practice experience in people with cancer.

Methods

We used data from participants with cancer in a larger study practicing app-based relaxation techniques over 10 weeks, assessed momentary relaxation before and after every third relaxation practice, and analyzed momentary relaxation changes with a linear mixed-effects model.

Results

The sample included 611 before-after observations from 91 participants (70 females (76.9%)) with a mean age of 55.43 years (SD 10.88). We found moderate evidence for variations in momentary relaxation changes across different techniques (P = .026), with short meditation, mindfulness meditation, guided imagery, and progressive muscle relaxation more frequently observed and leading to more relaxation than body scan and walking meditation. Furthermore, we found moderate evidence for increasing momentary relaxation changes over time (P = .046), but no evidence for an association between momentary relaxation and the number of previous observations (proxy for practice experience; P = .47).

Conclusion

We compared six app-based relaxation techniques in a real-life setting of people with cancer. The observed variations in perceived momentary relaxation appear to correspond with the popularity of the techniques used: The most popular relaxation techniques were the most effective and the least popular were the least effective. The effects increased over time, likely caused by dropout of individuals who gained no immediate benefit. Our findings open an interesting avenue for future research to better understand which relaxation techniques work best for whom in which situations.

Trial Registration

DRKS00027546; https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00027546

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于应用程序的放松技巧对瞬间放松感知的影响:癌症患者的观察数据分析。
目的研究六种放松技巧对癌症患者瞬间放松感知的影响,以及放松效果与时间和练习经验之间可能存在的关联:我们使用了一项大型研究中癌症患者在 10 周内练习基于应用程序的放松技巧的数据,在每三次放松练习前后对瞬间放松进行了评估,并使用线性混合效应模型分析了瞬间放松的变化:样本包括 91 名参与者(70 名女性,占 76.9%)的 611 个前后观察结果,平均年龄为 55.43 岁(标准差为 10.88)。我们发现有中等程度的证据表明,不同技巧的瞬间放松变化存在差异(P = .026),与身体扫描和步行冥想相比,短时冥想、正念冥想、引导想象和渐进式肌肉放松的观察频率更高,带来的放松也更多。此外,我们还发现了随着时间推移瞬间放松变化增加的中等程度证据(P = .046),但没有证据表明瞬间放松与之前观察次数(代表练习经验;P = .47)之间存在关联:我们在癌症患者的真实生活环境中比较了六种基于应用程序的放松技巧。观察到的瞬间放松感的变化似乎与所使用技巧的流行程度相符:最受欢迎的放松技巧效果最好,而最不受欢迎的技巧效果最差。随着时间的推移,效果会逐渐增强,这可能是由于没有立即获益的人退出了研究。我们的研究结果为今后的研究开辟了一条有趣的途径,以更好地了解哪些放松技巧在哪些情况下对哪些人最有效:DRKS00027546; https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00027546.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Journal of Psychosomatic Research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.40%
发文量
314
审稿时长
6.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychosomatic Research is a multidisciplinary research journal covering all aspects of the relationships between psychology and medicine. The scope is broad and ranges from basic human biological and psychological research to evaluations of treatment and services. Papers will normally be concerned with illness or patients rather than studies of healthy populations. Studies concerning special populations, such as the elderly and children and adolescents, are welcome. In addition to peer-reviewed original papers, the journal publishes editorials, reviews, and other papers related to the journal''s aims.
期刊最新文献
Poor stress resilience in adolescence predicts higher risk of severe COVID-19 and other respiratory infections: A prospective cohort study of 1.4 million Swedish men Connecting the dots: Network structures of internalizing and functional symptoms in a population-based cohort Acceptance and commitment therapy for people with depressive and anxiety symptoms following acquired brain injury: Results of the BrainACT randomized controlled trial Beyond physical healing: The essential role of integrated care in trauma recovery Validation of the German Purpose in Life Questionnaire (PLQ) in a healthy population and patients with cardiovascular disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1