Prognostic evaluation in gallbladder carcinoma: Introducing a composite risk model integrating nutritional and immune markers.

0 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Biomolecules & biomedicine Pub Date : 2025-01-14 DOI:10.17305/bb.2024.10673
Si-Qi Yang, Rui-Qi Zou, Yu-Shi Dai, Hai-Jie Hu, Fu-Yu Li
{"title":"Prognostic evaluation in gallbladder carcinoma: Introducing a composite risk model integrating nutritional and immune markers.","authors":"Si-Qi Yang, Rui-Qi Zou, Yu-Shi Dai, Hai-Jie Hu, Fu-Yu Li","doi":"10.17305/bb.2024.10673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The importance of evaluating the nutritional status and immune condition prior to surgery has gained significant attention in predicting the prognosis of cancer patients in recent years. The objective of this study is to establish a risk model for predicting the prognosis of gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) patients. Data from GBC patients who underwent radical resection at West China Hospital of Sichuan University (China) from 2014 to 2021 were retrospectively collected. A novel risk model was created by incorporating the prognostic nutritional index and glucose-to-lymphocyte ratio, and each patient was assigned a risk score. The patients were then divided into low- and high-risk cohorts, and comparisons were made between the two groups in terms of clinicopathological features and prognosis. Propensity score matching was conducted to reduce potential bias. A total of 300 GBC patients receiving radical surgery were identified and included in this study. Patients in the high-risk group were older, had higher levels of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 125 (CA125), and cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), were more likely to experience postoperative complications, and had more aggressive tumor characteristics, such as poor differentiation, lymph node metastasis, and advanced tumor stage. They also had lower overall survival (OS) rates (5-year OS rate: 11.2% vs. 37.4%) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates (5-year DFS rate: 5.1% vs. 18.2%). After propensity score matching, the high-risk population still experienced poorer prognosis (5-year OS rate: 12.7% vs 20.5%; 5-year DFS rate: 3.2% vs 8.2%). The risk model combining prognostic nutritional index and glucose-to-lymphocyte ratio can serve as a standalone predictor for the prognosis and assist in optimizing the treatment approach for GBC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":72398,"journal":{"name":"Biomolecules & biomedicine","volume":" ","pages":"425-435"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11734823/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomolecules & biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17305/bb.2024.10673","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The importance of evaluating the nutritional status and immune condition prior to surgery has gained significant attention in predicting the prognosis of cancer patients in recent years. The objective of this study is to establish a risk model for predicting the prognosis of gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) patients. Data from GBC patients who underwent radical resection at West China Hospital of Sichuan University (China) from 2014 to 2021 were retrospectively collected. A novel risk model was created by incorporating the prognostic nutritional index and glucose-to-lymphocyte ratio, and each patient was assigned a risk score. The patients were then divided into low- and high-risk cohorts, and comparisons were made between the two groups in terms of clinicopathological features and prognosis. Propensity score matching was conducted to reduce potential bias. A total of 300 GBC patients receiving radical surgery were identified and included in this study. Patients in the high-risk group were older, had higher levels of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 125 (CA125), and cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), were more likely to experience postoperative complications, and had more aggressive tumor characteristics, such as poor differentiation, lymph node metastasis, and advanced tumor stage. They also had lower overall survival (OS) rates (5-year OS rate: 11.2% vs. 37.4%) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates (5-year DFS rate: 5.1% vs. 18.2%). After propensity score matching, the high-risk population still experienced poorer prognosis (5-year OS rate: 12.7% vs 20.5%; 5-year DFS rate: 3.2% vs 8.2%). The risk model combining prognostic nutritional index and glucose-to-lymphocyte ratio can serve as a standalone predictor for the prognosis and assist in optimizing the treatment approach for GBC patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胆囊癌的预后评估:引入营养和免疫标记的复合风险模型。
近年来,手术前营养状况和免疫状况评估在预测癌症患者预后方面的重要性受到了广泛关注。本研究旨在建立预测胆囊癌(GBC)患者预后的风险模型。研究人员回顾性收集了2014年至2021年在四川大学华西医院接受根治性切除术的胆囊癌患者的数据。结合预后营养指数和血糖淋巴细胞比值,建立了一个新的风险模型,并为每位患者分配了一个风险评分。然后将患者分为低风险和高风险两组,并对两组患者的临床病理特征和预后进行比较。为减少潜在偏差,进行了倾向评分匹配。本研究共确定并纳入了300名接受根治性手术的GBC患者。高危组中的患者年龄较大,血清癌胚抗原(CEA)、癌抗原125(CA125)和癌抗原19-9(CA19-9)水平较高,更有可能出现术后并发症,肿瘤分化差、淋巴结转移和肿瘤分期较晚等侵袭性更强的肿瘤特征。他们的总生存(OS)率(5 年 OS 率:11.2% 对 37.4%)和无病生存(DFS)率(5 年 DFS 率:5.1% 对 18.2%)也更低。倾向得分匹配后,高风险人群的预后仍然较差(5 年 OS 率:12.7% 对 20.5%;5 年 DFS 率:3.2% 对 8.2%)。结合预后营养指数和血糖淋巴细胞比值的风险模型可作为独立的预后预测指标,有助于优化 GBC 患者的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical profile and risk factors for respiratory failure in children with Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. Association between diabetes mellitus and tinnitus: A meta-analysis. Long-term smoking contributes to aging frailty and inflammatory response. Deep learning approach based on a patch residual for pediatric supracondylar subtle fracture detection. The molecular mechanisms of cuproptosis and its relevance to atherosclerosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1