Effect of Aromatherapy on Perceived Mental Health Parameters for Academic Department Workers Working From Home During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Pilot Study.

Global advances in integrative medicine and health Pub Date : 2024-07-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/27536130241267748
Susanne M Cutshall, Molly J Mallory, Shelley M Noehl, Jennifer N Soderlind, Karen M Fischer, Sanjeev Nanda, Brent A Bauer, Dietlind L Wahner-Roedler
{"title":"Effect of Aromatherapy on Perceived Mental Health Parameters for Academic Department Workers Working From Home During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Susanne M Cutshall, Molly J Mallory, Shelley M Noehl, Jennifer N Soderlind, Karen M Fischer, Sanjeev Nanda, Brent A Bauer, Dietlind L Wahner-Roedler","doi":"10.1177/27536130241267748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Before the COVID-19 pandemic began, medical staff and academic department workers reported increasing levels of stress and burnout because of strain on the health care system. The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated this strain and introduced several novel stressors, which included transitioning to remote work. Safe and scalable strategies are needed to help health care workers cope with these stressors. Aromatherapy may help address this need.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the effect of 2 aromatherapy interventions (essential oil blends termed STILL and FOCUS) on perceived mental/psychological health parameters for academic department workers working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were advised to use STILL for 5 days (Monday through Friday). After a 2-day washout period (Saturday and Sunday), participants were instructed to use FOCUS for 5 days (Monday through Friday). Participants completed a visual analog scale survey evaluating restlessness, fatigue, anxiety, stress, happiness, energy, relaxation, calmness, and well-being before and after each of the 2 intervention periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty academic department remote workers participated in the study. Mental/psychological health surveys were completed by 6 participants before and after using STILL and by 10 before and after using FOCUS. Five participants answered all survey questions before and after both interventions. Although mean (SD) perceived stress scores improved after both the STILL (4.3 [2.3] vs 1.8 [1.7], <i>P</i> = .03) and FOCUS (2.9 [2.3] vs 1.5 [1.4], <i>P</i> = .02) interventions, this improvement was not statistically significant after Bonferroni correction (adjusted α = .006). Most participants (73.3%) reported that participating in the study was worthwhile, and 81.3% indicated that they would recommend aromatherapy to others.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The STILL and FOCUS aromatherapy interventions did not significantly improve mental/psychological health parameters for remote academic department workers, although perceived stress was marginally improved and participants reported a perceived benefit from using aromatherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":73159,"journal":{"name":"Global advances in integrative medicine and health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11273579/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global advances in integrative medicine and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536130241267748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Before the COVID-19 pandemic began, medical staff and academic department workers reported increasing levels of stress and burnout because of strain on the health care system. The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated this strain and introduced several novel stressors, which included transitioning to remote work. Safe and scalable strategies are needed to help health care workers cope with these stressors. Aromatherapy may help address this need.

Objectives: To assess the effect of 2 aromatherapy interventions (essential oil blends termed STILL and FOCUS) on perceived mental/psychological health parameters for academic department workers working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: Participants were advised to use STILL for 5 days (Monday through Friday). After a 2-day washout period (Saturday and Sunday), participants were instructed to use FOCUS for 5 days (Monday through Friday). Participants completed a visual analog scale survey evaluating restlessness, fatigue, anxiety, stress, happiness, energy, relaxation, calmness, and well-being before and after each of the 2 intervention periods.

Results: Twenty academic department remote workers participated in the study. Mental/psychological health surveys were completed by 6 participants before and after using STILL and by 10 before and after using FOCUS. Five participants answered all survey questions before and after both interventions. Although mean (SD) perceived stress scores improved after both the STILL (4.3 [2.3] vs 1.8 [1.7], P = .03) and FOCUS (2.9 [2.3] vs 1.5 [1.4], P = .02) interventions, this improvement was not statistically significant after Bonferroni correction (adjusted α = .006). Most participants (73.3%) reported that participating in the study was worthwhile, and 81.3% indicated that they would recommend aromatherapy to others.

Conclusions: The STILL and FOCUS aromatherapy interventions did not significantly improve mental/psychological health parameters for remote academic department workers, although perceived stress was marginally improved and participants reported a perceived benefit from using aromatherapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
芳香疗法对 COVID-19 大流行期间在家工作的学术部门工作人员心理健康参数的影响:一项试点研究。
背景:在 COVID-19 大流行开始之前,医务人员和学术部门工作人员报告说,由于医疗保健系统的压力,他们的压力和倦怠程度不断增加。COVID-19 大流行加剧了这种压力,并引入了几种新的压力源,其中包括过渡到远程工作。我们需要安全、可扩展的策略来帮助医护人员应对这些压力。芳香疗法可能有助于满足这一需求:目的:评估在 COVID-19 大流行期间,两种芳香疗法干预措施(称为 STILL 和 FOCUS 的精油混合物)对在家工作的学术部门工作人员感知到的精神/心理健康参数的影响:建议参与者使用 STILL 5 天(周一至周五)。经过 2 天的冲洗期(周六和周日)后,建议参与者使用 FOCUS 5 天(周一至周五)。参与者在两个干预期前后各完成一次视觉模拟量表调查,对烦躁、疲劳、焦虑、压力、快乐、精力、放松、平静和幸福感进行评估:20 名学术部门的远程工作人员参与了这项研究。在使用 STILL 前后,6 名参与者完成了精神/心理健康调查;在使用 FOCUS 前后,10 名参与者完成了精神/心理健康调查。5 名参与者在两次干预前后回答了所有调查问题。虽然在 STILL(4.3 [2.3] vs 1.8 [1.7],P = .03)和 FOCUS(2.9 [2.3] vs 1.5 [1.4],P = .02)干预后,平均(标清)感知压力得分均有所提高,但经过 Bonferroni 校正(调整后的α = .006)后,这种提高在统计学上并不显著。大多数参与者(73.3%)表示参加这项研究是值得的,81.3%的参与者表示会向他人推荐芳香疗法:结论:"STILL "和 "FOCUS "芳香疗法干预措施并未明显改善偏远学术部门工作人员的精神/心理健康参数,尽管他们的压力感知略有改善,而且参与者认为使用芳香疗法对他们有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Needs and Preferences for Remote-Delivered Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in Patients After Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Qualitative Study. Using PROMIS Methodology to Create Self-Report Measures of Mindfulness and Related Concepts. Patient Experience and Attitudes Toward Electronic Intake and Patient-Reported Outcomes Within an Outpatient Whole Health Center. A Validation Study of the Mindfulness-Based Interventions Teaching Assessment Criteria for Assessing Mindfulness-Based Intervention Teacher Skill: Inter-Rater Reliability and Predictive Validity. Efficacy and Safety of Bacillus coagulans LBSC in Drug Induced Constipation Associated With Functional Gastrointestinal Disorder: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Interventional, Parallel, Controlled Trial a Clinical Study on Bacillus coagulans LBSC for Drug Induced Constipation Associated With FGIDs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1