Gaps in the coordination of care for people living with dementia

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of the American Geriatrics Society Pub Date : 2024-07-29 DOI:10.1111/jgs.19105
Lisa M. Kern MD, MPH, Catherine Riffin PhD, Veerawat Phongtankuel MD, MS, Joselyne E. Aucapina, Samprit Banerjee PhD, Joanna B. Ringel MPH, Jonathan N. Tobin PhD, Semhar Fisseha MPH, Helena Meiri RN, MA, Sigall K. Bell MD, Paul N. Casale MD, MPH
{"title":"Gaps in the coordination of care for people living with dementia","authors":"Lisa M. Kern MD, MPH,&nbsp;Catherine Riffin PhD,&nbsp;Veerawat Phongtankuel MD, MS,&nbsp;Joselyne E. Aucapina,&nbsp;Samprit Banerjee PhD,&nbsp;Joanna B. Ringel MPH,&nbsp;Jonathan N. Tobin PhD,&nbsp;Semhar Fisseha MPH,&nbsp;Helena Meiri RN, MA,&nbsp;Sigall K. Bell MD,&nbsp;Paul N. Casale MD, MPH","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>One-third of people living with dementia (PLWD) have highly fragmented care (i.e., care spread across many ambulatory providers without a dominant provider). It is unclear whether PLWD with fragmented care and their caregivers perceive gaps in communication among the providers involved and whether any such gaps are perceived as benign inconveniences or as clinically meaningful, leading to adverse events. We sought to determine the frequency of perceived gaps in communication (coordination) among providers and the frequency of self-reported adverse events attributed to poor coordination.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a cross-sectional study in the context of a Medicare accountable care organization (ACO) in New York in 2022–2023. We included PLWD who were attributed to the ACO, had fragmented care in the past year by claims (reversed Bice-Boxerman Index ≥0.86), and were in a pragmatic clinical trial on care management. We used an existing survey instrument to determine perceptions of care coordination and perceptions of four adverse events (repeat tests, drug–drug interactions, emergency department visits, and hospital admissions). ACO care managers collected data by telephone, using clinical judgment to determine whether each survey respondent was the patient or a caregiver. We used descriptive statistics to summarize results.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 167 eligible PLWD, surveys were completed for 97 (58.1%). Of those, 88 (90.7%) reported having &gt;1 ambulatory visit and &gt;1 ambulatory provider and were thus at risk for gaps in care coordination and included in the analysis. Of those, 23 respondents were patients (26.1%) and 64 were caregivers (72.7%), with one respondent's role missing. Overall, 57% of respondents reported a problem (or “gap”) in the coordination of care and, separately, 18% reported an adverse event that they attributed to poor care coordination.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Gaps in coordination of care for PLWD are reported to be very common and often perceived as hazardous.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"72 10","pages":"3119-3128"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19105","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

One-third of people living with dementia (PLWD) have highly fragmented care (i.e., care spread across many ambulatory providers without a dominant provider). It is unclear whether PLWD with fragmented care and their caregivers perceive gaps in communication among the providers involved and whether any such gaps are perceived as benign inconveniences or as clinically meaningful, leading to adverse events. We sought to determine the frequency of perceived gaps in communication (coordination) among providers and the frequency of self-reported adverse events attributed to poor coordination.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study in the context of a Medicare accountable care organization (ACO) in New York in 2022–2023. We included PLWD who were attributed to the ACO, had fragmented care in the past year by claims (reversed Bice-Boxerman Index ≥0.86), and were in a pragmatic clinical trial on care management. We used an existing survey instrument to determine perceptions of care coordination and perceptions of four adverse events (repeat tests, drug–drug interactions, emergency department visits, and hospital admissions). ACO care managers collected data by telephone, using clinical judgment to determine whether each survey respondent was the patient or a caregiver. We used descriptive statistics to summarize results.

Results

Of 167 eligible PLWD, surveys were completed for 97 (58.1%). Of those, 88 (90.7%) reported having >1 ambulatory visit and >1 ambulatory provider and were thus at risk for gaps in care coordination and included in the analysis. Of those, 23 respondents were patients (26.1%) and 64 were caregivers (72.7%), with one respondent's role missing. Overall, 57% of respondents reported a problem (or “gap”) in the coordination of care and, separately, 18% reported an adverse event that they attributed to poor care coordination.

Conclusion

Gaps in coordination of care for PLWD are reported to be very common and often perceived as hazardous.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在协调对痴呆症患者的护理方面存在差距。
背景:三分之一的痴呆症患者(PLWD)接受的是高度分散的护理(即护理分散在许多流动医疗服务提供者之间,而没有一个主要的医疗服务提供者)。目前尚不清楚接受分散护理的痴呆症患者及其护理人员是否认为相关医疗服务提供者之间存在沟通上的隔阂,也不清楚这些隔阂是被视为良性的不便,还是被视为有临床意义的隔阂,从而导致不良事件的发生。我们试图确定医疗服务提供者之间在沟通(协调)方面存在差距的频率,以及自我报告的因协调不力而导致的不良事件的频率:我们于 2022-2023 年在纽约的一家医疗保险责任护理组织 (ACO) 中开展了一项横断面研究。我们纳入了归属于 ACO 的 PLWD,这些 PLWD 在过去一年中报销的医疗费用分散(反向 Bice-Boxerman 指数≥0.86),并且参加了一项关于护理管理的实用临床试验。我们使用现有的调查工具来确定对护理协调的看法以及对四种不良事件(重复检查、药物相互作用、急诊就诊和入院)的看法。ACO 护理经理通过电话收集数据,利用临床判断来确定每位调查对象是患者还是护理人员。我们使用描述性统计来总结结果:在 167 名符合条件的 PLWD 中,97 人(58.1%)完成了调查。其中,88 人(90.7%)报告说,他们接受过 >1 次门诊就诊和 >1 次门诊医疗服务提供者提供的服务,因此有可能在护理协调方面存在差距,并被纳入分析范围。其中,23 位受访者是患者(26.1%),64 位受访者是护理人员(72.7%),还有一位受访者的角色缺失。总体而言,57% 的受访者报告了护理协调方面的问题(或 "差距"),另有 18% 的受访者报告了不良事件,并将其归咎于护理协调不力:结论:据报告,为 PLWD 提供的护理协调方面的差距非常普遍,而且通常被认为是危险的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
504
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) is the go-to journal for clinical aging research. We provide a diverse, interprofessional community of healthcare professionals with the latest insights on geriatrics education, clinical practice, and public policy—all supporting the high-quality, person-centered care essential to our well-being as we age. Since the publication of our first edition in 1953, JAGS has remained one of the oldest and most impactful journals dedicated exclusively to gerontology and geriatrics.
期刊最新文献
Notices Issue Information Cover Issue Information Author Index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1