Police-issued barring notices in Western Australia: An analysis of the type, seriousness and trajectory of associated offences

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Drug and alcohol review Pub Date : 2024-07-30 DOI:10.1111/dar.13916
Clare Farmer, Nicholas Taylor, Ryan Baldwin, Peter G. Miller
{"title":"Police-issued barring notices in Western Australia: An analysis of the type, seriousness and trajectory of associated offences","authors":"Clare Farmer,&nbsp;Nicholas Taylor,&nbsp;Ryan Baldwin,&nbsp;Peter G. Miller","doi":"10.1111/dar.13916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Police-issued barring notices are currently used in Western Australia in response to alcohol-related disorderly and anti-social behaviour. This paper examines the type, severity and trajectory of the offending behaviours associated with served barring notices.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>WA Police Force de-identified the data for 3815 individuals who had received one or more police-imposed barring notice/s between 2011 and 2020. The offence category associated with each barring notice was examined to explore the overall breakdown and whether/how offending categories change for recipients of subsequent barring notices.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>For single and multiple barring notice recipients, the most common offence categories were fighting/physical violence and public order offences. Within a subset of the data, non-anti-social offences also spiked. Aggressive behaviours predominate for recipients in metropolitan areas, compared with public order offences in regional locations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion and Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>For recipients of multiple barring notices, behaviours do not become more serious but neither do they moderate to any notable extent. The low number of repeat barring notices (5%) may suggest an overall beneficial effect on recipient behaviours but more analysis is needed to examine the potential confounding effects of factors, such as fly-in/fly-out workers, policing and locational differences.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11318,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol review","volume":"43 7","pages":"1676-1685"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dar.13916","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dar.13916","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Police-issued barring notices are currently used in Western Australia in response to alcohol-related disorderly and anti-social behaviour. This paper examines the type, severity and trajectory of the offending behaviours associated with served barring notices.

Method

WA Police Force de-identified the data for 3815 individuals who had received one or more police-imposed barring notice/s between 2011 and 2020. The offence category associated with each barring notice was examined to explore the overall breakdown and whether/how offending categories change for recipients of subsequent barring notices.

Results

For single and multiple barring notice recipients, the most common offence categories were fighting/physical violence and public order offences. Within a subset of the data, non-anti-social offences also spiked. Aggressive behaviours predominate for recipients in metropolitan areas, compared with public order offences in regional locations.

Discussion and Conclusions

For recipients of multiple barring notices, behaviours do not become more serious but neither do they moderate to any notable extent. The low number of repeat barring notices (5%) may suggest an overall beneficial effect on recipient behaviours but more analysis is needed to examine the potential confounding effects of factors, such as fly-in/fly-out workers, policing and locational differences.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西澳大利亚州警方签发的禁止令:对相关罪行的类型、严重程度和发展轨迹的分析。
导言:西澳大利亚州目前使用警方签发的禁止令来应对与酒精有关的扰乱治安和反社会行为。本文研究了与禁止令相关的犯罪行为的类型、严重程度和轨迹:西澳大利亚州警察局对 2011 年至 2020 年间收到过一份或多份警方禁止令的 3815 人的数据进行了去标识化处理。研究了与每份禁止令相关的犯罪类别,以探讨总体细分情况,以及随后收到禁止令的人的犯罪类别是否/如何发生变化:对于单个和多个禁止令通知接收者而言,最常见的犯罪类别是打架斗殴/人身暴力和公共秩序犯罪。在部分数据中,非反社会犯罪也有所增加。与地区性的公共秩序犯罪相比,大都市地区的禁止令接收者主要以攻击行为为主:对于多次收到禁止令的人来说,其行为并没有变得更加严重,但也没有明显缓和。重复禁止令的数量较少(5%),这可能表明对接收者行为的总体影响是有益的,但还需要进行更多的分析,以研究飞入/飞出工作者、治安和地区差异等因素的潜在混杂效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol review
Drug and alcohol review SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: Drug and Alcohol Review is an international meeting ground for the views, expertise and experience of all those involved in studying alcohol, tobacco and drug problems. Contributors to the Journal examine and report on alcohol and drug use from a wide range of clinical, biomedical, epidemiological, psychological and sociological perspectives. Drug and Alcohol Review particularly encourages the submission of papers which have a harm reduction perspective. However, all philosophies will find a place in the Journal: the principal criterion for publication of papers is their quality.
期刊最新文献
A chance for countries to support Ireland's world-leading cancer warning labels for alcohol containers. Drinking practices: The variation of drinking events across intersections of sex, age and household income. Childhood traumatic experiences and vaping among Australian adolescents: A prospective investigation. Issue Information Australian psychologists' attitudes towards psychedelic-assisted therapy and training following a world-first drug down-scheduling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1