Patient-delivered partner therapy for chlamydia: health practitioner views on updated guidance in Victoria, Australia.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Sexual health Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1071/SH24105
Chloe Warda, Helen Bittleston, Jacqueline Coombe, Heather O'Donnell, Jane S Hocking, Jane L Goller
{"title":"Patient-delivered partner therapy for chlamydia: health practitioner views on updated guidance in Victoria, Australia.","authors":"Chloe Warda, Helen Bittleston, Jacqueline Coombe, Heather O'Donnell, Jane S Hocking, Jane L Goller","doi":"10.1071/SH24105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Patient-delivered partner therapy (PDPT) involves providing a prescription or medication to a patient diagnosed with chlamydia to pass to their sexual partner/s. Barriers to PDPT include uncertainty about its integration into clinical practice and permissibility. In Victoria, Australia, the Department of Health provides clinical guidance for PDPT (updated in 2022). We explored health practitioner views on the usefulness of the updated guidance for providing PDPT. Methods We conducted an online survey (12 December 2022 to 2 May 2023) of health practitioners who primarily work in Victoria and can prescribe to treat chlamydia. The survey displayed excerpts from the guidance, and asked closed and free-text questions about its ability to address barriers to PDPT. Quantitative data were descriptively analysed, complemented by conventional content analysis of qualitative data. Results Of a total of 49 respondents (66.7% general practitioners), 74.5% were aware of PDPT, and 66.7% had previously offered PDPT. After viewing excerpts of the guidance, >80% agreed it could support them to identify patients eligible/ineligible for PDPT, and 66.7% indicated they would be comfortable to offer PDPT. The guidance was viewed as helpful to address some barriers, including complicated documentation (87.7%) and medico-legal concerns (66.7%). Qualitative data highlighted medico-legal concerns by a minority of respondents. Some raised concerns that the guidance recommended prescribing azithromycin, despite doxycycline being first-line chlamydia treatment. Conclusions The guidance was largely viewed as supportive for PDPT decision-making. There is scope for further refinements and clarifications, and wider dissemination of the guidance.</p>","PeriodicalId":22165,"journal":{"name":"Sexual health","volume":"21 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/SH24105","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Patient-delivered partner therapy (PDPT) involves providing a prescription or medication to a patient diagnosed with chlamydia to pass to their sexual partner/s. Barriers to PDPT include uncertainty about its integration into clinical practice and permissibility. In Victoria, Australia, the Department of Health provides clinical guidance for PDPT (updated in 2022). We explored health practitioner views on the usefulness of the updated guidance for providing PDPT. Methods We conducted an online survey (12 December 2022 to 2 May 2023) of health practitioners who primarily work in Victoria and can prescribe to treat chlamydia. The survey displayed excerpts from the guidance, and asked closed and free-text questions about its ability to address barriers to PDPT. Quantitative data were descriptively analysed, complemented by conventional content analysis of qualitative data. Results Of a total of 49 respondents (66.7% general practitioners), 74.5% were aware of PDPT, and 66.7% had previously offered PDPT. After viewing excerpts of the guidance, >80% agreed it could support them to identify patients eligible/ineligible for PDPT, and 66.7% indicated they would be comfortable to offer PDPT. The guidance was viewed as helpful to address some barriers, including complicated documentation (87.7%) and medico-legal concerns (66.7%). Qualitative data highlighted medico-legal concerns by a minority of respondents. Some raised concerns that the guidance recommended prescribing azithromycin, despite doxycycline being first-line chlamydia treatment. Conclusions The guidance was largely viewed as supportive for PDPT decision-making. There is scope for further refinements and clarifications, and wider dissemination of the guidance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
衣原体患者伴侣疗法:澳大利亚维多利亚州医疗从业人员对最新指南的看法。
背景 病人传递伴侣疗法(PDPT)是指向确诊为衣原体感染的病人提供处方或药物,让其传递给性伴侣。患者传递性伴侣疗法面临的障碍包括能否融入临床实践以及是否允许。在澳大利亚维多利亚州,卫生部为 PDPT 提供了临床指导(2022 年更新)。我们探讨了医疗从业人员对更新指南在提供 PDPT 方面的实用性的看法。方法 我们对主要在维多利亚州工作、可开处方治疗衣原体的医疗从业人员进行了在线调查(2022 年 12 月 12 日至 2023 年 5 月 2 日)。调查显示了指南的节选内容,并就指南能否解决 PDPT 的障碍提出了封闭式和自由文本问题。对定量数据进行了描述性分析,并对定性数据进行了常规内容分析。结果 在总共 49 名受访者(66.7% 为全科医生)中,74.5% 的人知道 PDPT,66.7% 的人以前提供过 PDPT。在阅读了指南节选后,超过 80% 的受访者认为指南可以帮助他们识别符合/不符合 PDPT 治疗条件的患者,66.7% 的受访者表示他们愿意提供 PDPT 治疗。指南被认为有助于解决一些障碍,包括复杂的文件记录(87.7%)和医疗法律问题(66.7%)。定性数据强调了少数受访者在医疗法律方面的担忧。一些受访者担心,尽管强力霉素是衣原体感染的一线治疗药物,但指南仍建议处方阿奇霉素。结论 该指南在很大程度上被视为支持 PDPT 的决策。该指南仍有进一步完善和澄清的空间,也有更广泛传播的空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sexual health
Sexual health 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Sexual Health publishes original and significant contributions to the fields of sexual health including HIV/AIDS, Sexually transmissible infections, issues of sexuality and relevant areas of reproductive health. This journal is directed towards those working in sexual health as clinicians, public health practitioners, researchers in behavioural, clinical, laboratory, public health or social, sciences. The journal publishes peer reviewed original research, editorials, review articles, topical debates, case reports and critical correspondence. Officially sponsored by: The Australasian Chapter of Sexual Health Medicine of RACP Sexual Health Society of Queensland Sexual Health is the official journal of the International Union against Sexually Transmitted Infections (IUSTI), Asia-Pacific, and the Asia-Oceania Federation of Sexology.
期刊最新文献
A holistic evaluation of sexual health disease investigation: case study of the 2022 Mpox outbreak in Santa Clara County, California. Young people's preferences and motivations for STI partner notification: observational findings from the 2024 Sex, Drugs and Rock 'n' Roll survey. Higher female partner age and longer duration of marriage: key factors for less frequent sexual intercourse in infertile couples. Health provider perspectives on establishing service linkages for treatment and follow-up from an Australian, web-based STI testing service: a qualitative study. Factors influencing experiences of non-consensual sex: results from a mixed data cross-sectional online survey of Australian university students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1