A Mixed Methods Approach to Understand Mother-Father Relationship and Perceived Stress Among Black Pregnant Women.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-29 DOI:10.1097/JPN.0000000000000838
Jenna M Wheeler, Jacqueline LaManna, Lindsey Esparza, Dalia Khalil, Jean W Davis, Rui Xie, Dawn P Misra, Carmen Giurgescu, Karen Kavanaugh
{"title":"A Mixed Methods Approach to Understand Mother-Father Relationship and Perceived Stress Among Black Pregnant Women.","authors":"Jenna M Wheeler, Jacqueline LaManna, Lindsey Esparza, Dalia Khalil, Jean W Davis, Rui Xie, Dawn P Misra, Carmen Giurgescu, Karen Kavanaugh","doi":"10.1097/JPN.0000000000000838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Black women in the United States report moderate to high levels of perceived stress during pregnancy. Though lower levels of involvement and support from father of the baby (FOB) and higher levels of conflict have been associated with higher levels of maternal perceived stress, it is not clear how Black pregnant women experience the mother-father relationship and its influence on perceived stress.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine and describe the mother-father relationship and its role in experiences of perceived stress from the perspective of Black pregnant women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a convergent, mixed methods approach with ideal-type analysis, we conducted a secondary analysis of data among 60 Black pregnant women enrolled in the Biosocial Impact on Black Births study. Women completed online self-report questionnaires and participated in a semi-structured interview by telephone.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants who reported more conflict with FOB also reported higher levels of perceived stress (ρ(47) = .431, P= .002). Themes (importance, communication, support, conflict, satisfaction, and stress) emerged from the data. Five distinct mother-father relationship typologies were identified following an ideal-type analysis of the combined dataset: Cared For; Managing Expectations; Just Friends, For the Kids; It's Complicated; and Can't be Bothered.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings are an innovative exemplar of ideal-type analysis and provide a deeper understanding of the nuance and dynamics within the mother-father relationship and how it influences perceived stress among Black pregnant women.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Clinicians must recognize the significance of the mother-father relationship and, when appropriate, encourage paternal involvement or intervene if there is conflict during pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":54773,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPN.0000000000000838","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Black women in the United States report moderate to high levels of perceived stress during pregnancy. Though lower levels of involvement and support from father of the baby (FOB) and higher levels of conflict have been associated with higher levels of maternal perceived stress, it is not clear how Black pregnant women experience the mother-father relationship and its influence on perceived stress.

Purpose: To examine and describe the mother-father relationship and its role in experiences of perceived stress from the perspective of Black pregnant women.

Methods: Using a convergent, mixed methods approach with ideal-type analysis, we conducted a secondary analysis of data among 60 Black pregnant women enrolled in the Biosocial Impact on Black Births study. Women completed online self-report questionnaires and participated in a semi-structured interview by telephone.

Results: Participants who reported more conflict with FOB also reported higher levels of perceived stress (ρ(47) = .431, P= .002). Themes (importance, communication, support, conflict, satisfaction, and stress) emerged from the data. Five distinct mother-father relationship typologies were identified following an ideal-type analysis of the combined dataset: Cared For; Managing Expectations; Just Friends, For the Kids; It's Complicated; and Can't be Bothered.

Conclusions: These findings are an innovative exemplar of ideal-type analysis and provide a deeper understanding of the nuance and dynamics within the mother-father relationship and how it influences perceived stress among Black pregnant women.

Implications: Clinicians must recognize the significance of the mother-father relationship and, when appropriate, encourage paternal involvement or intervene if there is conflict during pregnancy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用混合方法了解母亲与父亲的关系以及黑人孕妇感知到的压力。
背景:美国黑人妇女报告称,她们在怀孕期间感受到了中度到高度的压力。虽然婴儿父亲(FOB)较低程度的参与和支持以及较高程度的冲突与孕产妇较高程度的感知压力有关,但目前尚不清楚黑人孕妇如何体验母亲与父亲的关系及其对感知压力的影响。目的:从黑人孕妇的角度研究和描述母亲与父亲的关系及其在感知压力体验中的作用:采用理想型分析的聚合混合方法,我们对参加黑人生育生物社会影响研究的 60 名黑人孕妇的数据进行了二次分析。妇女们填写了在线自我报告问卷,并参加了半结构化电话访谈:结果:报告与 FOB 冲突较多的参与者也报告了较高的感知压力水平(ρ(47) = .431,P= .002)。数据中出现了一些主题(重要性、沟通、支持、冲突、满意度和压力)。在对综合数据集进行理想类型分析后,确定了五种不同的母亲-父亲关系类型:关心;管理期望;只是朋友,为了孩子;很复杂;不能烦:这些发现是理想类型分析的一个创新范例,让我们更深入地了解了母亲与父亲关系中的细微差别和动态变化,以及这种关系如何影响黑人孕妇的压力感知:临床医生必须认识到母父关系的重要性,并在适当的时候鼓励父亲参与其中,或在孕期出现冲突时进行干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
147
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perinatal and Neonatal Nursing (JPNN) strives to advance the practice of evidence-based perinatal and neonatal nursing through peer-reviewed articles in a topic-oriented format. Each issue features scholarly manuscripts, continuing education options, and columns on expert opinions, legal and risk management, and education resources. The perinatal focus of JPNN centers around labor and delivery and intrapartum services specifically and overall perinatal services broadly. The neonatal focus emphasizes neonatal intensive care and includes the spectrum of neonatal and infant care outcomes. Featured articles for JPNN include evidence-based reviews, innovative clinical programs and projects, clinical updates and education and research-related articles appropriate for registered and advanced practice nurses. The primary objective of The Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing is to provide practicing nurses with useful information on perinatal and neonatal nursing. Each issue is PEER REVIEWED and will feature one topic, to be covered in depth. JPNN is a refereed journal. All manuscripts submitted for publication are peer reviewed by a minimum of three members of the editorial board. Manuscripts are evaluated on the basis of accuracy and relevance of content, fit with the journal purpose and upcoming issue topics, and writing style. Both clinical and research manuscripts applicable to perinatal and neonatal care are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
mHealth Service Effects for Negative Emotions Among Parents of Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. An Internet-Based Developmental Home Care Support Program Improved Maternal Psychological Symptoms and Infant Growth: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Depiction of Homemade Infant Formula and Formula Hacks on Pinterest: An Unsafe and Unhealthy Pin for Infants? The Effect of Baby Friendly Neonatal Intensive Care Initiative on Exclusive Breastfeeding Rates following Discharge in Very Preterm Infants. The Effect of Mother's Voice and Father's Voice Listened by Newborns During Heel Blood Collection on Pain Level and Physiological Parameters: A Randomized Controlled Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1