Sadie B Sommer, James M Muchira, Etoi A Garrison, Rachel L Walden, Riya Chinni, Joshua H van der Eerden, Mulubrhan F Mogos
{"title":"Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Pregnancy and Postpartum Periods.","authors":"Sadie B Sommer, James M Muchira, Etoi A Garrison, Rachel L Walden, Riya Chinni, Joshua H van der Eerden, Mulubrhan F Mogos","doi":"10.1097/JPN.0000000000000900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Early detection and management of hypertensive disorders during pregnancy and postpartum are essential. This systematic review and meta analysis aimed: (1) to examine the state of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) use, and (2) in a subset of studies, evaluate 24-hour ABP parameters in the prediction and identification of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy (HDP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted in March of 2022 for English language studies published after 2000. In a subset of studies in this review, we conducted a meta analysis summarizing 24-hour, day, and night standardized mean difference (hedge's g) in systolic and diastolic blood pressure during pregnancy for individuals later diagnosed with HDP and those without.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 69 articles met all established criteria and were included in this systematic review, and a subgroup of studies that reported HDP outcomes (n=14) were included in the meta analysis. Out of the 69 studies, 31 (45.61%) used 24-hour ABP devices that are not validated for pregnant individuals. Birthing individuals diagnosed with HDP had elevated 24-hour, day, and night systolic and diastolic blood pressure during second and third trimesters of pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A noticeable gap exists in the utilization of validated 24-hour ABP devices for pregnant and postpartum populations. Variations exist regarding the timing of 24-hour ABP measurements, particularly across trimesters.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>24-hour ABP monitoring could serve as one of the tools to identify and manage pregnant individuals at risk of HDP and ultimately reverse the current trend in maternal mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":54773,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPN.0000000000000900","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Early detection and management of hypertensive disorders during pregnancy and postpartum are essential. This systematic review and meta analysis aimed: (1) to examine the state of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) use, and (2) in a subset of studies, evaluate 24-hour ABP parameters in the prediction and identification of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy (HDP).
Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in March of 2022 for English language studies published after 2000. In a subset of studies in this review, we conducted a meta analysis summarizing 24-hour, day, and night standardized mean difference (hedge's g) in systolic and diastolic blood pressure during pregnancy for individuals later diagnosed with HDP and those without.
Results: A total of 69 articles met all established criteria and were included in this systematic review, and a subgroup of studies that reported HDP outcomes (n=14) were included in the meta analysis. Out of the 69 studies, 31 (45.61%) used 24-hour ABP devices that are not validated for pregnant individuals. Birthing individuals diagnosed with HDP had elevated 24-hour, day, and night systolic and diastolic blood pressure during second and third trimesters of pregnancy.
Conclusion: A noticeable gap exists in the utilization of validated 24-hour ABP devices for pregnant and postpartum populations. Variations exist regarding the timing of 24-hour ABP measurements, particularly across trimesters.
Implications for practice: 24-hour ABP monitoring could serve as one of the tools to identify and manage pregnant individuals at risk of HDP and ultimately reverse the current trend in maternal mortality.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Perinatal and Neonatal Nursing (JPNN) strives to advance the practice of evidence-based perinatal and neonatal nursing through peer-reviewed articles in a topic-oriented format. Each issue features scholarly manuscripts, continuing education options, and columns on expert opinions, legal and risk management, and education resources. The perinatal focus of JPNN centers around labor and delivery and intrapartum services specifically and overall perinatal services broadly. The neonatal focus emphasizes neonatal intensive care and includes the spectrum of neonatal and infant care outcomes. Featured articles for JPNN include evidence-based reviews, innovative clinical programs and projects, clinical updates and education and research-related articles appropriate for registered and advanced practice nurses.
The primary objective of The Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing is to provide practicing nurses with useful information on perinatal and neonatal nursing. Each issue is PEER REVIEWED and will feature one topic, to be covered in depth. JPNN is a refereed journal. All manuscripts submitted for publication are peer reviewed by a minimum of three members of the editorial board. Manuscripts are evaluated on the basis of accuracy and relevance of content, fit with the journal purpose and upcoming issue topics, and writing style. Both clinical and research manuscripts applicable to perinatal and neonatal care are welcomed.