Comparisons of Various Anthropometric Indices for Incident Hypertension in Military Young Adults: The CHIEF Cohort Study.

Kun-Zhe Tsai, Yen-Chen Lin, Chen-Ming Huang, Kai-Ti Yang, Han-Hsing Chen, Hui-Shang Wang, Gen-Min Lin
{"title":"Comparisons of Various Anthropometric Indices for Incident Hypertension in Military Young Adults: The CHIEF Cohort Study.","authors":"Kun-Zhe Tsai, Yen-Chen Lin, Chen-Ming Huang, Kai-Ti Yang, Han-Hsing Chen, Hui-Shang Wang, Gen-Min Lin","doi":"10.2174/0118715303303679240611120022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The study aimed to compare the predictive capabilities of the traditional anthropometric indices with the novel anthropometric indices for incident hypertension.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Some novel anthropometric indices, e.g., the Body Roundness Index (BRI) and A Body Shape Index (ABSI) have been associated with prevalent hypertension. There are a few cohort studies that have examined the association of the novel anthropometric indices with newonset hypertension in young adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 2,448 military male and female young adults, aged 18-39 years, free of hypertension at baseline in Taiwan; they were followed for incidence of hypertension from 2014 till the end of 2020. Blood Pressure (BP) in mmHg was measured twice and averaged to verify hypertension, which was defined as systolic BP ≥130 and/or diastolic BP ≥80 or on antihypertensive medication therapy in each annual health examination. Anthropometric indices included the Body Mass Index (BMI) defined as the weight (kg)/height squared (m2), Waist Girth (WC) in cm, the Waist-to-height Ratio (WHtR), the BRI defined as 364.2 - 365.5 × {1 - [(WC/2π)/(0.5 × height)]2}0.5, as well as ABSI defined as WC/(BMI2/3 × height1/2). Multiple Cox regression analysis and Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the Receiver of Operating Characteristics (ROC) were utilized with adjustments for the baseline potential covariates to determine the association and compare the performance of various indices for incident hypertension.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During a median follow-up period of 6.0 years, 920 new-onset hypertension cases (37.6%) developed. Higher BMI, WC, BRI (per each 1-unit increase) and WHtR (per each 0.1- unit increase) were associated with a greater risk of new-onset hypertension [Hazard Ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals: 1.060 (1.035-1.085), 1.021 (1.011-1.030), and 1.178 (1.077-1.288), respectively], whereas there was no association between ABSI and new-onset hypertension. For the ROC, WC was observed with the greatest AUC for incident new-onset hypertension [0.661 (0.638-0.683)], followed by BMI [0.650 (0.628-0.673)], while the ABSI was found with the lowest AUC [0.544 (0.521-0.568)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most of the anthropometric indices were associated with a higher risk of new-onset hypertension among young adults, except for ABSI. In addition, this study has suggested the traditional indices, such as WC and BMI, to be superior to the latest ones, e.g., BRI and ABSI, for the prediction of new-onset hypertension.</p>","PeriodicalId":94316,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0118715303303679240611120022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The study aimed to compare the predictive capabilities of the traditional anthropometric indices with the novel anthropometric indices for incident hypertension.

Background: Some novel anthropometric indices, e.g., the Body Roundness Index (BRI) and A Body Shape Index (ABSI) have been associated with prevalent hypertension. There are a few cohort studies that have examined the association of the novel anthropometric indices with newonset hypertension in young adults.

Methods: This study included 2,448 military male and female young adults, aged 18-39 years, free of hypertension at baseline in Taiwan; they were followed for incidence of hypertension from 2014 till the end of 2020. Blood Pressure (BP) in mmHg was measured twice and averaged to verify hypertension, which was defined as systolic BP ≥130 and/or diastolic BP ≥80 or on antihypertensive medication therapy in each annual health examination. Anthropometric indices included the Body Mass Index (BMI) defined as the weight (kg)/height squared (m2), Waist Girth (WC) in cm, the Waist-to-height Ratio (WHtR), the BRI defined as 364.2 - 365.5 × {1 - [(WC/2π)/(0.5 × height)]2}0.5, as well as ABSI defined as WC/(BMI2/3 × height1/2). Multiple Cox regression analysis and Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the Receiver of Operating Characteristics (ROC) were utilized with adjustments for the baseline potential covariates to determine the association and compare the performance of various indices for incident hypertension.

Results: During a median follow-up period of 6.0 years, 920 new-onset hypertension cases (37.6%) developed. Higher BMI, WC, BRI (per each 1-unit increase) and WHtR (per each 0.1- unit increase) were associated with a greater risk of new-onset hypertension [Hazard Ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals: 1.060 (1.035-1.085), 1.021 (1.011-1.030), and 1.178 (1.077-1.288), respectively], whereas there was no association between ABSI and new-onset hypertension. For the ROC, WC was observed with the greatest AUC for incident new-onset hypertension [0.661 (0.638-0.683)], followed by BMI [0.650 (0.628-0.673)], while the ABSI was found with the lowest AUC [0.544 (0.521-0.568)].

Conclusion: Most of the anthropometric indices were associated with a higher risk of new-onset hypertension among young adults, except for ABSI. In addition, this study has suggested the traditional indices, such as WC and BMI, to be superior to the latest ones, e.g., BRI and ABSI, for the prediction of new-onset hypertension.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
各种人体测量指标与军队年轻人高血压发病率的比较:CHIEF 队列研究
目的:本研究旨在比较传统人体测量指数和新型人体测量指数对高血压发病率的预测能力:背景:一些新型人体测量指数,如身体圆度指数(BRI)和体形指数(ABSI)与高血压发病率有关。目前只有少数队列研究探讨了新型人体测量指数与青壮年新发高血压的关系:本研究纳入了 2448 名年龄在 18-39 岁之间、基线时无高血压的台湾男性和女性青壮年军人;从 2014 年到 2020 年底,对他们的高血压发病率进行了跟踪调查。在每年的健康检查中,以毫米汞柱为单位测量两次血压并取平均值来验证高血压,即收缩压≥130和/或舒张压≥80或正在接受降压药物治疗。人体测量指数包括体重指数(BMI)(定义为体重(公斤)/身高平方(平方米))、腰围(WC)(以厘米为单位)、腰高比(WHtR)、BRI(定义为 364.2 - 365.5 × {1 - [(WC/2π)/(0.5 × 身高)]2}0.5)以及 ABSI(定义为 WC/(BMI2/3 × 身高 1/2))。在对基线潜在协变量进行调整后,利用多元 Cox 回归分析和工作特征受体曲线下面积(AUC)来确定高血压发病的关联性并比较各种指数的性能:在中位 6.0 年的随访期间,共有 920 例(37.6%)新发高血压。BMI、WC、BRI(每增加 1 个单位)和 WHtR(每增加 0.1 个单位)越高,新发高血压的风险越大[危险比(HRs)和 95% 置信区间分别为 1.060 (1.035-1.085)、1.021 (1.011-1.030) 和 1.178 (1.077-1.288)],而 ABSI 与新发高血压之间没有关联。在 ROC 中,观察到 WC 与新发高血压的 AUC 最大[0.661(0.638-0.683)],其次是 BMI [0.650(0.628-0.673)],而 ABSI 的 AUC 最低[0.544(0.521-0.568)]:结论:除 ABSI 外,大多数人体测量指数与青壮年新发高血压的较高风险相关。此外,本研究还表明,在预测新发高血压方面,传统的指数(如腹围和体重指数)优于最新的指数(如 BRI 和 ABSI)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Safety Profile of Statins for Post-Marketing Adverse Cardiovascular Events: A Real-World Pharmacovigilance Analysis. Tanshinone IIA Regulates NRF2/NLRP3 Signal Pathway to Restrain Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Uric Acid-Induced HK-2 Fibrotic Models. Ketogenic Diet and Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases: A Bibliometric Study and Visualization Analysis. Effects of ethanol extract from senna leaf (EESL) on inflammation and oxidative stress in mice: A non-targeted metabolomic study. Revealing Fibrosis Genes as Biomarkers of Ulcerative Colitis: A Bioinformatics Study Based on ScRNA and Bulk RNA Datasets.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1