“People that are Supporting [the] Whole Sector are on their Knees”; Uncertainty and Socioeconomic Change are Occupational Stressors for Irish Farmers☆

IF 2.3 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY RURAL SOCIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-29 DOI:10.1111/ruso.12554
Joseph Firnhaber, Sandra M. Malone, Anna Donnla O'Hagan, Sinéad O'Keeffe, John McNamara, Siobhán O'Connor
{"title":"“People that are Supporting [the] Whole Sector are on their Knees”; Uncertainty and Socioeconomic Change are Occupational Stressors for Irish Farmers☆","authors":"Joseph Firnhaber, Sandra M. Malone, Anna Donnla O'Hagan, Sinéad O'Keeffe, John McNamara, Siobhán O'Connor","doi":"10.1111/ruso.12554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Farming is a stressful occupation with many farmers facing daily uncertainty and high mental health risks. In addition to unpredictable occupations, rapidly changing European and Irish agricultural policies may put farmers in a liminal state. We aimed to identify sources of occupational stress or well‐being for Irish farmers, particularly regarding change in their lives and communities. We collected data online through semistructured interviews with 17 farmers and 1 interview and 3 focus groups with 11 farming stakeholders. We identified four central narratives (N1‐4) through narrative analysis. In N1, participants described how rapid changes could create stress by exacerbating uncertainty and threatening farmers' financial security. Participants described how these changes to standards for “good farming” (N2) and rural culture (N3) result in lost income, identity, and well‐being. In N4, participants identified ways in which work of farming can be therapeutic. Our findings add to literature on the impacts of uncertainty and liminality on farmers by identifying how deeply changes in agricultural models can impact farmers' identities and well‐being as they grapple with new and old occupational pressures. We suggest that economic policy and agricultural governance prioritize farmers' financial security and mental health through policy change and acknowledge their valuable contributions.","PeriodicalId":47924,"journal":{"name":"RURAL SOCIOLOGY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RURAL SOCIOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12554","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Farming is a stressful occupation with many farmers facing daily uncertainty and high mental health risks. In addition to unpredictable occupations, rapidly changing European and Irish agricultural policies may put farmers in a liminal state. We aimed to identify sources of occupational stress or well‐being for Irish farmers, particularly regarding change in their lives and communities. We collected data online through semistructured interviews with 17 farmers and 1 interview and 3 focus groups with 11 farming stakeholders. We identified four central narratives (N1‐4) through narrative analysis. In N1, participants described how rapid changes could create stress by exacerbating uncertainty and threatening farmers' financial security. Participants described how these changes to standards for “good farming” (N2) and rural culture (N3) result in lost income, identity, and well‐being. In N4, participants identified ways in which work of farming can be therapeutic. Our findings add to literature on the impacts of uncertainty and liminality on farmers by identifying how deeply changes in agricultural models can impact farmers' identities and well‐being as they grapple with new and old occupational pressures. We suggest that economic policy and agricultural governance prioritize farmers' financial security and mental health through policy change and acknowledge their valuable contributions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"支持[整个]行业的人都跪了";不确定性和社会经济变化是爱尔兰农民的职业压力源☆。
务农是一项压力很大的职业,许多农民每天都面临着不确定性和较高的心理健康风险。除了不可预测的职业外,快速变化的欧洲和爱尔兰农业政策也可能使农民处于边缘状态。我们旨在确定爱尔兰农民的职业压力或幸福感的来源,尤其是在他们的生活和社区发生变化时。我们通过对 17 名农民进行半结构化访谈,以及对 11 名农业利益相关者进行 1 次访谈和 3 次焦点小组讨论,在线收集数据。通过叙事分析,我们确定了四个中心叙事(N1-4)。在 N1 中,参与者描述了快速变化如何通过加剧不确定性和威胁农民的财务安全来制造压力。与会者描述了这些对 "良好农业 "标准(N2)和农村文化(N3)的改变如何导致收入、身份和福祉的损失。在 N4 中,与会者指出了农耕工作可以起到治疗作用的方式。我们的研究结果为有关不确定性和边缘性对农民影响的文献增添了新的内容,指出了农业模式的变化如何在农民努力应对新旧职业压力的过程中深刻影响他们的身份认同和幸福感。我们建议经济政策和农业治理通过政策变革优先考虑农民的经济安全和心理健康,并承认他们的宝贵贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
RURAL SOCIOLOGY
RURAL SOCIOLOGY SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: A forum for cutting-edge research, Rural Sociology explores sociological and interdisciplinary approaches to emerging social issues and new approaches to recurring social issues affecting rural people and places. The journal is particularly interested in advancing sociological theory and welcomes the use of a wide range of social science methodologies. Manuscripts that use a sociological perspective to address the effects of local and global systems on rural people and places, rural community revitalization, rural demographic changes, rural poverty, natural resource allocations, the environment, food and agricultural systems, and related topics from all regions of the world are welcome. Rural Sociology also accepts papers that significantly advance the measurement of key sociological concepts or provide well-documented critical analysis of one or more theories as these measures and analyses are related to rural sociology.
期刊最新文献
Indigenous Perspectives on Dismantling the Legacies of Settler Colonialism in Rural Sociology☆ Energy Service Security for Public Health Resilience: Perception and Concerns in Western Upper Peninsula of Michigan☆ The Dignity of Nonworking Men* Family Farmers as Agents in the Struggle for Survival: A Case Study from Turkey☆ Shared Ideals, But Persistent Barriers: Improving Tribal‐University Research Engagement to Strengthen Native Nation Building and Rural Development☆
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1