Assessing perceived usability of Google Drive using cloud usability model: a mixed method study

Farwa Taqi, Alia Arshad, Syeda Hina Batool
{"title":"Assessing perceived usability of Google Drive using cloud usability model: a mixed method study","authors":"Farwa Taqi, Alia Arshad, Syeda Hina Batool","doi":"10.1108/gkmc-08-2023-0308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to evaluate the usability of Google Drive (GD) in addition to measuring the effectiveness of GD and the challenges faced while using this cloud storage application among public library users of Lahore.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe study adopted a sequential explanatory mixed method design comprising the quantitative (QUAN) and qualitative (QUAL) parts. For the QUAN phase, a questionnaire survey was conducted among 384 users of public libraries through purposive sampling. For the QUAL phase, the think aloud technique was performed on several tasks during experiments and verbalized their thoughts and experiences while interacting with the system. The cloud usability model (CUM) was used to measure the “usability” of GD.\n\n\nFindings\nFindings indicated that most users were satisfied with GD's obvious features and inherent functions. QUAL results indicated that respondents did most tasks easily, whereas only some could complete the task.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe study is valuable as it is the first time used CUM to measure the perceived usability of GD. Second, the study used a mixed method study to get insights into perceived usability, effectiveness and challenges while using GD. The findings might be helpful for cloud support teams, including GD, as they can enhance certain features of usability, which lead to increased usage among users.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis research work is based on MPhil thesis.\n","PeriodicalId":507843,"journal":{"name":"Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication","volume":"8 27","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/gkmc-08-2023-0308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to evaluate the usability of Google Drive (GD) in addition to measuring the effectiveness of GD and the challenges faced while using this cloud storage application among public library users of Lahore. Design/methodology/approach The study adopted a sequential explanatory mixed method design comprising the quantitative (QUAN) and qualitative (QUAL) parts. For the QUAN phase, a questionnaire survey was conducted among 384 users of public libraries through purposive sampling. For the QUAL phase, the think aloud technique was performed on several tasks during experiments and verbalized their thoughts and experiences while interacting with the system. The cloud usability model (CUM) was used to measure the “usability” of GD. Findings Findings indicated that most users were satisfied with GD's obvious features and inherent functions. QUAL results indicated that respondents did most tasks easily, whereas only some could complete the task. Research limitations/implications The study is valuable as it is the first time used CUM to measure the perceived usability of GD. Second, the study used a mixed method study to get insights into perceived usability, effectiveness and challenges while using GD. The findings might be helpful for cloud support teams, including GD, as they can enhance certain features of usability, which lead to increased usage among users. Originality/value This research work is based on MPhil thesis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用云可用性模型评估 Google Drive 的可用性:一项混合方法研究
本研究旨在评估谷歌硬盘(GD)的可用性,同时衡量 GD 的有效性以及拉合尔公共图书馆用户在使用该云存储应用程序时所面临的挑战。在定量(QUAN)阶段,通过目的性抽样对 384 名公共图书馆用户进行了问卷调查。在定性(QUAL)阶段,在实验过程中对几项任务采用了 "大声思考 "技术,用户在与系统交互时用语言表达了自己的想法和体验。研究结果表明,大多数用户对 GD 的明显特征和固有功能表示满意。QUAL结果表明,大多数任务受访者都能轻松完成,而只有部分受访者能完成任务。其次,本研究采用了混合方法来深入了解受访者在使用广东的过程中感知到的可用性、有效性和挑战。研究结果可能会对包括广东在内的云支持团队有所帮助,因为他们可以增强可用性的某些功能,从而提高用户的使用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Farmers’ access to agricultural information sources: a study of Lakadong turmeric farmers Understanding Malaysia’s perceived destination image formation through online user-generated content information qualities Farmers’ access to agricultural information sources: a study of Lakadong turmeric farmers Understanding Malaysia’s perceived destination image formation through online user-generated content information qualities Enhancing service delivery through digital transformation in the public sector in South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1