Association between cardiometabolic phenotypes with atherogenic index of plasma: a cross-sectional study from the Azar Cohort Study

S. Soheilifard, R. Mahdavi, E. Faramarzi
{"title":"Association between cardiometabolic phenotypes with atherogenic index of plasma: a cross-sectional study from the Azar Cohort Study","authors":"S. Soheilifard, R. Mahdavi, E. Faramarzi","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.29.24311169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study was conducted to determine the relationship between cardiometabolic phenotypes and atherogenic index of plasma in the Azar cohort population. Methods: This cross sectional study included 9,515 participants aged 35 to 55, using data from the Azar Cohort Study. Metabolic syndrome was defined based on ATP III criteria. Participants were then classified into four cardiometabolic phenotypes by considering BMI and metabolic syndrome components: metabolically healthy normal weight (MHNW, BMI <25 kg/m2), metabolically unhealthy normal weight (MUHNW, BMI <25 kg/m2), metabolically healthy obese (MHO, BMI >25 kg/m2), and metabolically unhealthy obese (MUHO, BMI>25 kg/m2). AIP was calculated. Result :Among the subjects, 4,801 (50.5%) were metabolically healthy obese (MHO) and 2,680 (28.2%) were metabolically unhealthy obese (MUHO). High-risk AIP levels (>0.21) differed significantly across cardiometabolic phenotypes, with MUHNW (79.6%) and MUHO (64.6%) showing the highest proportions compared to MHNW (13.5%) and MHO (18.6%). After adjusting for confounders, multinomial logistic regression analysis showed individuals in the third tertial of AIP were 103.46 times more likely to be MUHNW (OR = 103.46, 95% CI: 52.82to202.64), 55.77 times more likely to be MUHO (OR = 55.77, 95% CI: 45.65to68.12), and 2.22 times more likely to be MHO (OR = 2.22, 95% CI: 1.91to2.64) compared to the MHNW phenotype (p < 0.001 for all). Conclusion: The study demonstrates significant variation in high risk AIP levels across cardiometabolic phenotypes, emphasizing the need for detailed metabolic health assessments beyond BMI to better predict cardiovascular risk. Keywords: cardiometabolic phenotypes, atherogenic index of plasma, BMI, metabolic health.","PeriodicalId":506788,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.29.24311169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study was conducted to determine the relationship between cardiometabolic phenotypes and atherogenic index of plasma in the Azar cohort population. Methods: This cross sectional study included 9,515 participants aged 35 to 55, using data from the Azar Cohort Study. Metabolic syndrome was defined based on ATP III criteria. Participants were then classified into four cardiometabolic phenotypes by considering BMI and metabolic syndrome components: metabolically healthy normal weight (MHNW, BMI <25 kg/m2), metabolically unhealthy normal weight (MUHNW, BMI <25 kg/m2), metabolically healthy obese (MHO, BMI >25 kg/m2), and metabolically unhealthy obese (MUHO, BMI>25 kg/m2). AIP was calculated. Result :Among the subjects, 4,801 (50.5%) were metabolically healthy obese (MHO) and 2,680 (28.2%) were metabolically unhealthy obese (MUHO). High-risk AIP levels (>0.21) differed significantly across cardiometabolic phenotypes, with MUHNW (79.6%) and MUHO (64.6%) showing the highest proportions compared to MHNW (13.5%) and MHO (18.6%). After adjusting for confounders, multinomial logistic regression analysis showed individuals in the third tertial of AIP were 103.46 times more likely to be MUHNW (OR = 103.46, 95% CI: 52.82to202.64), 55.77 times more likely to be MUHO (OR = 55.77, 95% CI: 45.65to68.12), and 2.22 times more likely to be MHO (OR = 2.22, 95% CI: 1.91to2.64) compared to the MHNW phenotype (p < 0.001 for all). Conclusion: The study demonstrates significant variation in high risk AIP levels across cardiometabolic phenotypes, emphasizing the need for detailed metabolic health assessments beyond BMI to better predict cardiovascular risk. Keywords: cardiometabolic phenotypes, atherogenic index of plasma, BMI, metabolic health.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心脏代谢表型与血浆致动脉粥样硬化指数之间的关系:一项来自阿扎尔队列研究的横断面研究
研究背景本研究旨在确定阿扎尔队列人群的心脏代谢表型与血浆致动脉粥样硬化指数之间的关系。研究方法这项横断面研究利用阿扎尔队列研究的数据,纳入了 9,515 名 35 至 55 岁的参与者。代谢综合征是根据 ATP III 标准定义的。然后,根据体重指数和代谢综合征成分将参与者分为四种心脏代谢表型:代谢健康正常体重(MHNW,体重指数 25 kg/m2)和代谢不健康肥胖(MUHO,体重指数>25 kg/m2)。计算出 AIP。结果 :受试者中有 4 801 人(50.5%)属于代谢健康型肥胖(MHO),2 680 人(28.2%)属于代谢不健康型肥胖(MUHO)。不同心脏代谢表型的高危 AIP 水平(>0.21)差异显著,其中 MUHNW(79.6%)和 MUHO(64.6%)与 MHNW(13.5%)和 MHO(18.6%)相比比例最高。在对混杂因素进行调整后,多项式逻辑回归分析表明,AIP 第三序列中的个体成为 MUHNW 的可能性是 MUHO 的 103.46 倍(OR = 103.46,95% CI:52.82to202.64),成为 MUHO 的可能性是 MHNW 表型的 55.77 倍(OR = 55.77,95% CI:45.65 至 68.12),成为 MHO 的可能性是 MHNW 表型的 2.22 倍(OR = 2.22,95% CI:1.91 至 2.64)(P < 0.001)。结论该研究表明,不同心血管代谢表型的高风险 AIP 水平存在显著差异,这强调了除体重指数外,还需要进行详细的代谢健康评估,以更好地预测心血管风险。关键词:心脏代谢表型、血浆致动脉粥样硬化指数、体重指数、代谢健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reemergence of Oropouche virus between 2023 and 2024 in Brazil Towards Personalized Breast Cancer Risk Management: A Thai Cohort Study on Polygenic Risk Scores Hot Spring Residency and Disease Association: a Crossover Gene-Environment Interaction (GxE) Study in Taiwan Evaluation of the diagnostic value of YiDiXie™-SS, YiDiXie™-HS and YiDiXie™-D in renal cancer Dual exposure-by-polygenic score interactions highlight disparities across social groups in the proportion needed to benefit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1