South Africa’s solidarity fund: navigating the shores of uncertainty and crisis

Keratiloe Mogotsi, Amanda Bowen, Clare Mitchell
{"title":"South Africa’s solidarity fund: navigating the shores of uncertainty and crisis","authors":"Keratiloe Mogotsi, Amanda Bowen, Clare Mitchell","doi":"10.1108/eemcs-04-2024-0133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learning outcomes\nThe learning outcomes focus on enabling higher-order learning for students to critically assess Agile project management in philanthropic settings, specifically compare and contrast Agile project management versus traditional project management in the context of a non-profit organisation (The Solidarity Fund) during a crisis; discuss and evaluate the role and contribution of philanthropy during times of crisis; rate the value additions and contributions of Agile approaches in philanthropy; evaluate the phases of Agile (unconventional) project management executed by The Solidarity Fund; and develop a review of the impact of the work done by The Solidarity Fund in terms of the approach that the Fund used. How effective/not effective was it?\n\nCase overview/synopsis\nChaos, crisis and confusion: the three “C”s that succinctly condense the status quo during the COVID-19 pandemic. The roles and contributions of non-profit organisations gained recognition as countries worldwide responded to the crisis to save lives and livelihoods.\nIn South Africa, there was a sense of urgency and considerable pressure for a multi-stakeholder approach led by the government to save as many South African lives as possible. The conditions, however, were the opposite of traditional project management methodologies that advocate for the management of the triple constraints, namely, cost, time and scope.\nHow could cost be managed in a project without a set budget and which was reliant on philanthropy? How could time be managed without a set deadline and while tackling an invisible enemy – a virus that changed dynamics on a daily basis and – how could scope be managed in a context where the future was increasingly uncertain?\n\nComplexity academic level\nThis case study can be useful for students undertaking postgraduate diploma in business, master of business administration (MBA), master of management courses.\n\nSupplementary material\nTeaching notes are available for educators only.\n\nSubject code\nCSS 11: Strategy.\n","PeriodicalId":505724,"journal":{"name":"Emerald Emerging Markets Case Studies","volume":"7 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerald Emerging Markets Case Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/eemcs-04-2024-0133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Learning outcomes The learning outcomes focus on enabling higher-order learning for students to critically assess Agile project management in philanthropic settings, specifically compare and contrast Agile project management versus traditional project management in the context of a non-profit organisation (The Solidarity Fund) during a crisis; discuss and evaluate the role and contribution of philanthropy during times of crisis; rate the value additions and contributions of Agile approaches in philanthropy; evaluate the phases of Agile (unconventional) project management executed by The Solidarity Fund; and develop a review of the impact of the work done by The Solidarity Fund in terms of the approach that the Fund used. How effective/not effective was it? Case overview/synopsis Chaos, crisis and confusion: the three “C”s that succinctly condense the status quo during the COVID-19 pandemic. The roles and contributions of non-profit organisations gained recognition as countries worldwide responded to the crisis to save lives and livelihoods. In South Africa, there was a sense of urgency and considerable pressure for a multi-stakeholder approach led by the government to save as many South African lives as possible. The conditions, however, were the opposite of traditional project management methodologies that advocate for the management of the triple constraints, namely, cost, time and scope. How could cost be managed in a project without a set budget and which was reliant on philanthropy? How could time be managed without a set deadline and while tackling an invisible enemy – a virus that changed dynamics on a daily basis and – how could scope be managed in a context where the future was increasingly uncertain? Complexity academic level This case study can be useful for students undertaking postgraduate diploma in business, master of business administration (MBA), master of management courses. Supplementary material Teaching notes are available for educators only. Subject code CSS 11: Strategy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非团结基金:在不确定性和危机中航行
学习成果学习成果的重点是使学生能够进行高阶学习,批判性地评估慈善事业中的敏捷项目 管理,特别是比较和对比非营利组织(团结基金)在危机期间的敏捷项目管理和传统项 目管理;讨论并评估慈善事业在危机时期的作用和贡献;评价敏捷方法在慈善事业中的增值作用和贡献;评估团结基金实施的敏捷(非常规)项目管理的各个阶段;并根据团结基金所使用的方法,对该基金所做工作的影响进行回顾。案例概述/梗概混乱、危机和困惑:三个 "C "简明扼要地概括了 COVID-19 大流行期间的现状。非营利组织的作用和贡献在世界各国应对危机、挽救生命和生计的过程中得到了认可。在南非,人们有一种紧迫感和巨大的压力,要求政府领导多方利益相关者采取措施,尽可能多地挽救南非人的生命。然而,当时的条件与传统的项目管理方法恰恰相反,传统的项目管理方法主张对成本、时间和范围这三重制约因素进行管理。在一个没有固定预算且依赖慈善事业的项目中,如何对成本进行管理?在一个没有固定预算、依赖慈善事业的项目中,如何管理成本?如何在没有固定期限的情况下管理时间,同时应对一个看不见的敌人--一种每天都在改变动态的病毒?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bachpan Bachao Andolon: saving childhood! Bachpan Bachao Andolon: saving childhood! Nigam Pratibha Vidyalaya – aligning new hire with the art integration philosophy Nigam Pratibha Vidyalaya – aligning new hire with the art integration philosophy Cultivating sustainability and resilience in olive heritage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1